The influence of kinesiology tape on a functionally demanding eversion sprint

in healthy male soccer players

Chris Brogden & Matt Greig

Summary.

Tape has often been used as a means of preventing and managing sports injuries, by restricting range of motion at a joint. However, this restricted movement impair athletic performance and increase the risk of injury at other sites. The development of kinesiology tape offers a purported increase in mechanical support without the restriction in joint range. Our results show that kinesiology tape applied to the ankle complex did not impair performance on a functionally demanding eversion sprint in healthy male soccer players. Landing kinetics were unchanged, but there was a beneficial effect in the rate of vertical force development in the drive phase post-amortisation, initiating the 45° sprint. Kinesiology tape, with no observed restriction on performance in a functionally challenging and high-risk task, is therefore advocated as a means of injury prevention where subjects have no prior history of ankle instability. Kinesiology tape might also offer some mechanical benefits to rate of force development, though our findings are likely to be task-specific.

Author Information:

ChrisBrogden, Matt Greig PhD,

Sports Injuries Research Group, Dept. of Sport & Physical Activity,

Edge Hill University, St Helens Road, Ormskirk, Lancs L39 4QP, United Kingdom

Corresponding Auhtor: Dr Matt Greig: Tel: (+44) 01695 584848

Fax: (+44) 01695 584812

E-mail:

The influence of kinesiology tape on a functionally demanding eversion sprint in healthy male soccer players

Abstract

Background: Ankle injuries are prevalent in soccer, with implications for athletic development, performance, and subsequent risk of re-injury. Injury prevention and management strategies have included the use of tape, but inhibiting movement can impair performance. The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of kinesiology tape at the ankle jointduring a functionally demanding eversion sprint. Methods: The task required a drop landing onto a force platform, immediately followed by a 45° reactive (inversion or eversion) sprint. 11 male semi -professional soccer players (age = 25.5 ± 5.0 years, height 1.75 ± 0.12m, weight = 74 .50 ± 8.25 kg) performed 2 trials (separated by >48 hours)of the drop landing test, with counter-balanced assignment of the taped (KT) or no taped (NT) condition. In addition to the task completion time for the sprint, gound reaction force measures of drop landing impact forces, amortisation period,the rate of force development in drive phase, and the angle of takeoff were quantified. Results:There was no influence of tape condition on ground reaction forces at impact (Fz: P = 0.24; Fx: P = 0.51;Fy:P = 0.96) or on the duration of the amortization period (P = 0.56). KT did produce a significant improvement in the rate of vertical force development (P = 0.02) into the sprint, but did not change the angle of takeoff(P = 0.93) or the time to complete the task (P = 0.99). Conclusions: Application of KT using a functional correctional technique at the ankle did not inhibit task performance. Improvements were observed in the rate of force development, but the mechanism of improvement is unclear. If injury prevention is enhanced, with no detriment to performance, then KT could be advocated for athletic performance.

Key Words: soccer, ankle, injury, force, eversion, tape

INTRODUCTION

Taping is commonly used for the prevention and treatment of sports injuries,providing the athlete with protection and support to the muscle or joint during movement (1,2).However, whilst effective in injury prevention and management, the restriction on range of movement (RoM) can affect athletic performance (3) and potentially increase injury risk at other sites (4). The development of kinesiology tapes, which exert a pulling force to the skin (5), offer greater mechanical support and proprioceptive ability without restricting RoM (6). Whilst much of the previous literature into the purported benefits of kinesiology tape has considered injury prevention, our aim was to quantify the impact of kinesiology tapeon a functionally demanding, sport-specific task, in subjects with no history of previous ankle injury or joint instability.

Soccer is a huge participation sport with a relatively high injury rate (7-11). Ankle injuries are prevalent in soccer (12,13), with ~13%resulting in an average rehabilitation period of 14 – 28 days (7, 11-14), anda reoccurrence rate between 10-28% (13, 15-18). Hop and drop testshave been shown to be good predictors of ankle injury risk (19-20), with landing replicating the concurrent (21) plantar flexion and inversion of the ankle observed in 85% of injuries surrounding the lateral ligament complex. The activity profile of soccer is intermittent, irregular and multi-directional, comprising a variety of high risk movements such as sprinting, twisting, turning, cutting and landing (22).A widely accepted mechanism of an ankle sprain is the aberrant nature of ankle joint positioning upon initial contact with the surface during the transition period from an unloaded to loaded state. This is often seen in sports such as soccer when jumping or running (23), and the reactive nature of soccer further increases the mechanical complexity of such movements. Our aim was to quantify the influence of kinesiology tapeon the performance and kinetic response to a soccer-specific drop-and-drive task.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Inclusion criteria required players to have no injury history in the lower limb for the previous six months, neurologic or balance disorder or chronic ankle instability as determined by the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool. Eleven male sub-elite soccer players (age = 25.5 ± 5.0years, height 1.75 ± 0.12m, weight = 74 .50 ± 8.25 kg) with a minimum three training sessions and one match per week completed the study. All players provided written informed consent in accordance with the departmental ethical procedures and following the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Experimental Design

Players were tested in both a taped (KT) and no tape (NT) condition, performed in counter-balanced order. Trials were separated by a minimum of 48 hours. All test sessions were conducted at the same time of day to account for diurnal variation in postural stability (24). Before tape application, the lower shank of the dominant leg was cleaned using alcohol gel, before being thoroughly dried using a clean towel in order to allow the glue’s acrylic ability to adhere to the skin (6). The tape was applied to the dominant limbusing a corrective application technique in accordance with the KT® application guidelines (6), shown in Figure 1. The participant lay on a plinth in a supine position with the foot placed in relaxed position. The first strip of tape was placed from the anterior midfoot, stretched approximately to 115-120% of its maximal length and attached just below the anterior tibial tuberosity over the tibialis anterior muscle. The second strip began just above the medial malleolus and wrapped around the heel like a stirrup, attaching just lateral to the first strip of tape. The third strip stretched across the anterior ankle, covering both the medial and lateral malleolus. Finally, the fourth strip originated at the arch and stretched slightly, measuring 4-6 inches above both the medial and lateral malleolus.

** Insert Figure 1 near here **

From the point of the tape application to the initiation of data collection, a period of 25 minutes was allowed in order for the tape to gain its full adhesive strength (6).

During performance of the drop landing test, participants were required to step off a 35cm high platform (25),positioned to ensure landing was centred on the force platform (Bertec, Columbus, USA). Upon landing players were required to react to a light stimulus and accelerate through a set of timing gates (SmartSpeed, Fusion Sport, Australia) positioned at a 45° cutting angle from the mid-line of the force platform, at a distance of 4m. The stimulus was triggered by the players stepping through a beam as they initiated the drop. Inversion and eversion trials were counter-balanced, with 5 mins passive recovery between trials. Data presented here were measured during the eversion trial, given the relevance to the mechanism of ankle injury. The inversion trial was included to ensure a reactive task.

Performance was quantified as the time taken to complete the task. Kinetic measures at a sampling frequency of 1000 Hz were obtained in the medio-lateral (Fx), anterio-posterior (Fy) and vertical (Fz) movement planes. Ground reaction force data was calibrated to body weight for each player. Analysis of the ground reaction force data enabled the measurement of peak impact force in each direction, the duration between impact and initiation of the drive phase, and the rate of force development during the drive phase toward the timing gate. The resultant of the medio-lateral and anterio-posterior forces (Fxy) was used to calculate the rate of force development along the angle of takeoff.

Statistical Analysis

All resultsare reported as mean +SD, with significance set at P ≤ 0.05. Paired sample t-tests were used to investigate the influence of taping condition for each variable. All statistical analysis was completed using PASW Statistics Editor 18.0 for windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA).

RESULTS

The application of kinesiology tape (KT) did not inhibit task performance, with the time taken to complete the sprint no different between trials (KT: 1.49 ± 0.11 sec; NT: 1.50 ± 0.13 sec; P = 0.99).

Figure 2 summarises the influence of kinesiology tape (KT) on the peak forces (Fx,y,z) at impact from the drop landing. KT had no effect on peak force at impact in Fx (P = 0.51), Fy (P = 0.96), or Fz (P =0.24), suggesting a standardised drop landing task was completed.

** Insert Figure 2 near here **

Taping condition also had no influence on the duration of the amortisation phase (P = 0.56). In both trials the duration from impact to initiation of the drive phase into the sprint was 0.46 ± 0.22 sec.

Figure 3 summarises the kinetic measures derived from the drive phase into the eversion sprint. The application of kinesiology tape significantly (P = 0.02) increased the rate of force development (RFD) in the vertical plane. KT also resulted in a trend toward greater RFD in the medio-lateral direction (P = 0.10), but less RFD in the anterio-posterior direction (P = 0.16), though these results failed to reach statistical significance at the accepted level. The RFD in the Fxy vector was not significantly different between trials (P = 0.56). The angle of the Fxy vector toward the timing gates during the drive phase was also not influenced by the tape condition (KT = 44.42 ± 8.87º; NT = 47.61 ± 15.98º; P = 0.93).

** Insert Figure 3 near here **

DISCUSSION

Kinesiology tape is a contemporary and increasingly popular method to enhance athletic performance, prevent, manage and rehabilitate injuries. Our aim was to investigate the effects of kinesiology tape on the performance of, and kinetic response to a novel, functionally demanding drop-and-drive task. Specifically, we applied the tape at the ankle joint given the prevalence of ankle sprain injuries, and used healthy participants performing a task relevant to their sport. Tape has been used effectively to restrict range of movement about a joint, helping to prevent or manage injury, but potentially impairing athletic performance (3). The players were injury free, so that our aim was to investigate the inhibitory effects of the tape on performance, given the potential benefits of tape to injury prevention and management.

We found no change in performance of the drop-and-drive cutting sprint with kinesiology tape applied to the ankle complex. Thus for healthy athletes the lack of any performance impairment suggests that kinesiology tape can be advocated for injury prevention. Previous research has shown a similar lack of inhibition, but in participants with chronic joint instability (3). The healthy ankle used in our study presents a different context.

Our choice of task reflects the healthy status of our participants, with previous literature using less demanding tasks given a focus on patients with chronic injuries. The drop-landing task was incorporated into a 45° cutting sprint, functionally relevant to our chosen participants. Both the drop and subsequent drive elements of the task are functionally demanding, and represent high risk. The kinesiology tape has no effect on the tri-axial impact forces, suggesting a standardised landing technique was attained. The tape was administered in a corrective application manner (6), in accordance with recommendations in an attempt to enhance athletic performance. This method of taping does not aim to achieve a reduction in ankle range of motion, but acts instead as a pre-cursor for increased mechanoreceptor stimuli used to act as a pre-load during end of motion positions (6).

Similarly, the kinesiology tape had no performance inhibition on the time lapse between peak impact during the landing phase, and the initiation of the drive phase. Again this suggests equivalence in the functional performance of the task between the tape conditions. This amortisation period between impact and drive is important for performance in the sporting context, but also has implications for injury. It might be hypothesised that the amortization period would be shorter with kinesiology tape, the tension from the tape creating a stimulation of skin mechanoreceptors during active movement, and a decrease in reaction time. The lack of performance benefit in our study might reflect the manner in which the tape was applied, and a more mechanistic approach would be required to examine the reasons for this. Electromyographical data might provide greater insight to the influence of kinesiology tape on enhanced proprioceptive activity and the afferent activity to the surrounding musculature.

Time to shift from landing to drive phase, and ultimately the time taken to complete the sprint task were unaffected by the tape. This can be considered a positive result, indicative of no evident performance inhibition, and thus facilitating the use of tape for injury prevention. The kinetic response to the kinesiology tape did provide some interesting mechanistic changes however. During the drive phase, the kinesiology tape had no effect on the angle of takeoff, i.e. the angle of cut achieved during the drive phase immediately post-landing. The medio-lateral rate of force development was greater with KT applied, but the anterio-posterior value was decreased. As such the vector in the angle of takeoff was unchanged, but the observed benefit in the medio-lateral plane warrants consideration. The rate of force development was statistically greater with KT in the vertical plane, this following a high impact landing. Rate of force development has been shown to be a key predictor of athletic ability and performance with many researchers, coaches and physicians suggesting that it plays a key role (26). Anemphasis on rate of force development is widely used across many athletic disciplines, whether this be to improve strength and/or speed through a variety of training mediums such as plyometric, speed, or agility training (27).Our findings suggest a potential positive performance effect of kinesiology tape in enhancing rate of force development. The ability to drive quickly away from a high impact landing and generate higher medio-lateral force would benefit many athletic contexts.

Naturally our findings are specific to the nature of the task used, with a short 45° sprint initiated from a drop-landing task. The reactive nature of the task also increases the complexity and mechanical demand of the movement (28). Future research should consider the nature of the tape, the manner of application, the functional task(s), and more mechanistic measures of performance and mechanical response. Soccer players land in an uncontrolled and unpredictable manner, from a variety of different heights and respond to stimuli in multiple different directions. We conducted the study from one height with a pre-determined angle of the speed timing gates at 45º. Injury incidence in soccer increases with match-time, so that more ankle sprain injuries are observed in the last 15mins of each half (11). Several studies have highlighted fatigue-induced changes in dynamic balance with soccer-specific fatigue (29), and the efficacy of kinesiology tape as ameans of mediating fatigue warrants consideration. The effectiveness of tape in restricting joint movement has been shown to be time dependent (30), and thus the benefits of kinesiology tape might not extend to the duration of the full match.

CONCLUSION

Application of Kinesiology Tape using a functional correctional technique at the ankle did not inhibit performance on a functionally challenging reactive eversion sprint. No changes were observed in the direction of cut, or the time taken to complete the sprint. Improvements were observed in the rate of vertical force development in the takeoff phase of the sprint, but the mechanism of improvement is unclear. If injury prevention is enhanced, with no observed detriment to performance then KT can be advocated for athletic performance.

REFERENCES

  1. Verhagen ELM,Bay K (2010)Optimising ankle sprain prevention: a critical review and practical appraisal of the literature. British Journal of Sports Medicine44(15):1082–1088.
  2. Thelen MD, Dauber JA, Stoneman PD (2008)The Clinical Efficacy of Kinesio Tape for Shoulder Pain: A Randomised, Double-Blinded, Clinical Trial. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy38(7):389-395.
  3. Bicci S, KaratasN, Baltaci G (2012) Effect of Athletic Taping and Kinesiotaping on Measurements of Functional Performance in Basketball Players with Chronic Inversion Ankle Sprains. Internatioanl Journal of Sports Physical Therapy7(2):154-166.
  4. Stoffel KK, Nicholls RL, Winata, AR, Dempsey AR, Boyle JW, et al. (2010) Effect of Ankle Taping on Knee and Ankle Joint Biomechanics in Sporting Tasks. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise42(11):2089 – 2098.
  5. Halseth T, McChesney JW, Debeliso M, Vaughn R (2004) The effects of kinesio tm taping on proprioception at the ankle. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine3(1):1–7.
  6. Kase K, Wallis J, Kase T (2003) Clinical Therapeutic Applications of the Kinesio Taping Method. Kinesio Taping Association, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
  7. Aoki H, O’Hata N, Kohno T, Morikawa T, Seki J (2012)A 15-year prospective epidemiological account of acute traumatic injuries during official professional soccer league matches in Japan. American Journal ofSports Medicine40(5):1006–1014.
  8. Ekstrand J,Gillquist J (1983)Soccer injuries and their mechanisms: a prospective study. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise15(3):267-270.
  9. Ekstrand J, Hägglund M, Waldén M (2011) Injury incidence and injury patterns in professional football: the UEFA injury study. British Journal of Sports Medicine45(7):553–558.
  10. Hawkins RD, Fuller CW (1999)A prospective epidemiological study of injuries in four English professional football clubs. British Journal of Sports Medicine33(3):196–203.
  11. Woods C, Hawkins R, Hodson, A (2003)The Football Association Medical Research Programme : An audit of injuries in professional football: An analysis of ankle sprains. British Journal of Sports Medicine37:233–239.
  12. Agel J, Evans TA, Dick R, Putukian M, Marshall SW (2007)Descriptive Epidemiology of Collegiate Men’s Soccer Injuries: National Collegiate Athletic Association Injury Surveillance System, 1988-1989 Through 2002-2003. Journal of Athletic Training 42(2):270-277.
  13. Jacobs S, Van Den Berg L (2012)Prevalence, Severity and Mechanism of Acute Injuries in Elite Male African Youth Soccer Players. African Journal for Physical Health Education, Recreation and Dance18(2):329 – 343.
  14. Brito J, Malina RM, Seabra A, Massada JL, Soares JM, et al. (2012) Injuries in Portuguese youth soccer players during training and match play. Journal of Athletic Training47(2):191–197.
  15. Hagglund M, Walden M, Ekstrand J (2013)Risk Factors for Lower Extremity Muscle Injury in Professional Soccer: The UEFA Injury Study. American Journal of Sports Medicine41(2):327-335.
  16. Arnason A, Sigurdsson SB, Gudmundsson A, Holme I, Engebretsen, et al.(2004) Risk Factors for Injuries in Football. American Journal of Sports Medicine32(1):5S-16S.
  17. Cloke DJ, Ansell P, Avery P, Deehan D (2011)Ankle injuries in football academies: a three-centre prospective study. British Journal of Sports Medicine45(9):702–708.
  18. Hagglund M, Walden M, Ekstrand J (2005)Injury incidence and distribution in elite football-a prospective study of the Danish and the Swedish top divisions. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports15(1):21-28.
  19. Hamilton RT, Shultz SJ, Schmitz RJ, Perrin DH (2008)Triple-hop distance as a valid predictor of lower limb strength and power. Journal of Athletic Training 43(2):144–151.
  20. Holmes A, Delahunt E (2009)Treatment of common deficits associated with chronic ankle instability. Sports Medicine39(3):207–224.
  21. Gribble PA, Robinson RH (2009) Alterations in Knee Kinematics and Dynamic Stability Associated With Chronic Ankle Instability. Journal of Athletic Training44(4): 350–355.
  22. Wragg CB, Maxwell NS, Doust JH (2000)Evaluation of the Reliability and Validity of a Soccer-Specific Field Test of Repeated Sprint Ability. European Journal of Applied Physiology83(1):77–83.
  23. Wright IC, Neptune RR, Van den Bogert AJ, Nigg BM (2000)The influence of foot positioning on ankle sprains. Journal of Biomechanics33(5):513-519.
  24. Gribble PA, Tucker WS, White PA (2007) Time-of-day influences on static and dynamic postural control. Journal of Athletic Training42(1):35-41.
  25. O’Driscoll J, Kerin F, Delahunt E (2011). Effect of a 6-week dynamic neuromuscular training programme on ankle joint function: A Case report. Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation, Therapy & Technology 3:13.
  26. Cronin J, Hing R, McNair P (2004) Reliability and validity of a linear position transducer for measuring jump performance. Journal of Strength and ConditioningResearch18:590–593.
  27. Miller GM, Herniman JJ, Ricard, MD, Cheetham C, Michael TJ (2006)The Effects of a 6-Week Plyometric Training Program on Agility. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine5:459-465.
  28. Besier TF, Cochrane JL, Ackland TR (2001)External loading of the knee joint during running and cutting maneuvers. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 33:1168-1175.
  29. Greig M, Walker-Johnson C (2007) The influence of soccer-specific fatigue on functional stability. Physical Therapy in Sport8:185-190.
  30. Forbes H, Thrussell S, Haycock N, Lohkamp M, White M (2013) The effect of prophylactic ankle support during simulated soccer activity. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 22(3):170-176.

LEGENDS TO FIGURES