2008 Oxford Business &Economics Conference ProgramISBN : 978-0-9742114-7-3

The Implementation of Instructional Teaching Model 5 E (Engage, Explore, Explain, Elaborate, Evaluate): A Classroom Action Research Study at Organization Behavior Course in Economics Department,JakartaStateUniversity

Muhammad Yasser Arafat[1]

Economics Department, JakartaStateUniversity

Rawamangun Muka Street, East Jakarta 13220

Phone: +62214706285/+62215686655

Giving a lecture to students that is centered to teacher himself is considered less effective and not encourage them to boost their creativity and criticism to understand knowledge that the lecturer try to give. This condition makes the students have less capability to analyze, observe, and solve the problem in the real world that related to lesson they studied.

One of the teaching model that use lecturer as a center to get knowledge is instructional teaching model 5 E (Engage, Explore, Explain, Elaborate, and Evaluation).

One of the efforts to implement this instructional teaching model 5 E is doing the classroom action research. Classroom action research using the instructional teaching model 5 E is undertaken in 5 phases: the increasing of students’ engagement, the ability to understand concept, breakdown the concept, explain the case theory, and evaluate the result. This action research is flexible to change every phase. The implementation of instructional teaching model 5 E helps the students to increase their ability to think creatively, analyze the problems or theory and their self competence.

Quantitative analysis is used to draw every single progress of the students related to their understanding on concept or theory taught by lecturer, and also their result study improvement. The increase of result study is drawn and analyzed using simple statistic method, namely description statistic analysis. It can be seen that there are improvement of result study by 6% in phase two, 15.2% in phase three, 15.7% in phase four, and 7.9% in phase five.

Keyword:Classroom action research,Instructional teaching model,

Introduction

Nowadays, teaching method which focusing to the lecturer ability as a central of teaching process, found hard to improve and maximize students’ creativity and critics based on they studied.Problems often occurred in teaching centralized on the lecturer make students only able to remember all materials they got from their lecturer. On the other side, they have no further ability about the major what they study. Thus, it will decrease their ability to analyze, observe, and solve problems, related to their majorstudy.This such teaching process ignores idea, concept and ability of students, because it only uses a one-way teaching method--students only receive what lecturer gives, without concerning feedback from students.

Organizational Behavior is an obligatory subject/course for Commercial Study Program students, Economics Departmentof Jakarta State University (UNJ). As an alternative in teaching organizational behavior, instructional teaching model of 5E (Engage, Explore, Explain, Elaborate, Evaluation) could be used in order to ease the students to understand the material, concept and their implementation in reality.Hopefully by using instructional teaching-method of 5E (Engage, Explore, Explain, Elaborate, Evaluation), the students will be able to increase their ability to analyze and have competent performance in this subject. Furthermore, they will develop understanding about science and knowledge they get. One way to achieve the above-mentioned goal by doing a classroom action research, is implementing 5E instructional-teaching model (Engage, Explore, Explain, Elaborate, Evaluation).

Research Question

Based on the classroom action research above, thus the problem: Whether Instructional Teaching Model 5 E (Engage, Explore, Explain, Elaborate, and Evaluate) can improve understanding process of the students to science and knowledge they get, studying success, thus can also be an alternative as a teaching model?

Research Purposes

  1. Students, as a teaching object, shall understand and be expert in science and knowledge, theoretically and practically.
  2. Increase the participation in teaching process.
  3. Increase student achievement.
  4. Increase tee ability in problem analyzing, exists in topics of courses.

Theoretical Framework

Teaching and learning centers provide an array of programs and services to assist the instructor who is struggling or the excellent teacher looking for something new. The pedagogical tools suggested can range from collaborative group work to problem-based learning to on-line instruction. The dilemma facing the individual instructor is choosing from a myriad of teaching strategies to use in a particular classroom situation. Factors such as class size, content area, and student demographics play a role. The instructor’s own skills and style are also critical factors. Classroom Action Research (CAR) is systematic inquiry with the goal of informing practice in a particular situation. CAR is a way for instructors to discover what works best in their own classroom situation, thus allowing informed decisions about teaching.

CAR occupies a midpoint on a continuum ranging from teacher reflection at one end to traditional educational research at the other. It is more data-based and systematic than reflection, but less formal and controlled than traditional educational research. Instructors use data readily available from their classes in order to answer practical questions about teaching and learning in their classrooms. Further CAR integrates the two faculty roles of teaching and scholarship and is one form of the scholarship of teaching and learning[2].

Action Research gives teachers the skills needed to work on problems specific to their classrooms and their schools. By using an actual research procedure, researching teachers can resolve their own teaching challenges. They learn how to ask a focusing question, define terms, collect relevant data, use an analysis process that rules out bias, and includes methods that yield validity and reliability. The findings become immediately applicable to their individual situations.[3]

Action research is a tool that is used to help teachers and other educators uncover strategies to improve teaching practices, it is a viable and realistic endeavor for all educators. Action research requires teachers to design a study in an area of interest that they would like to carry out in their classrooms or schools. Many times, action research is considered a professional development opportunity because, frequently, teachers test a new instructional strategy, assess a new curriculum program, or evaluate an existing pedagogical method. In many research studies, participating in action research has been found to be the impetus for positive change exemplified by teacher improvement, self-reflection, and overall learning that chances classroom practices. These forms of change may impact teacher quality.

Instructional Teaching Method is a teaching model consists of three points which are different one another. This model focuses in making intellectual-decision by the lecturer before and after the course. Thus, this method is actually rather a model of planning and justifying than a model of ‘teaching procedure’. First, make specific determination about instructional goals for students’ activities. Second, pre-justifying to the students’ situation nowadays related to the instructional goals. Third, configuring achievement of these instructional goals made by the students.

Instructional teaching model, which has possibility for the teacher to improve the quality of making intellectual decision about teaching process. This approach used, based on this teaching concept, which: an instructional model gives possibility to the teacher to choose any instructional act that might succeed, and also whether it is an appropriate model, in order to make the teaching quality better. Teachers, who try to be better, should be considered as professional only. They are the capable actors who can use their specialty to achieve their best.

Instructional Model shall give attention to the students’ act at the end of the course. Having reached what the students shall be—the goals shall be specifically aimed before-, choosing teaching procedure will be easier, thus more effectively.As an example, if a teacher has a clear view about the final students-ability for the last three weeks while teaching process, he will be able to give students a chance to practice a consistent act as the desired goal into teaching units wished. He doesn’t have to kill his time by finding appropriate activity. Nevertheless, if it is a must, at least a teacher can give this appropriatepractice, or choosing pre acts for the practice, would be easier, because the specific goals have been determined.

Instructional Teaching Model 5 E

An instructional model used extensively in science curriculum, commonly referred to as the 5 E's consists of the following phases: engagement, exploration, explanation, elaborations, and evaluation. Each phase has a specific function and contributes to the teachers' coherent instruction and the students' constructing a better understanding of scientific and technological knowledge, attitudes and skills. The model can be used to help frame the sequence and organization of programs, units, and lessons. Once internalized, it also can inform the many instantaneous decisions science teachers must make in classroom situations. Each lesson in Strategic Science Teaching was developed using a 5 E's design template.

Four general factors support this instructional model: 1) educational research on conceptual change: 2) congruence of the model with the general processes of scientific inquiry and technological design 3) unity of the model for designing and developing curriculum materials, and 4) practical use by science.

The actual application of the phases in curriculum and teaching may not be as clear as outlined here; still, the model should contribute to better, more consistent, and coherent instruction. The instructional sequences include;

Engagement: In the first phase, the teacher designs experiences intended to make connections with current concepts and skills and to bring into question the adequacy of those concepts and skills Successful engagement results in students being puzzled by, and actively motivated in, the learning activity.

Exploration: Next, the teacher uses activities and some social interaction (cooperative learning) to help students begin constructing more adequate concepts and developing better skills this phase should be concrete and meaningful for students. The aim of exploration activities is to establish experiences that teachers and students can use later to formally introduce and discuss scientific and technological concepts, processes, or skills.

Explanation: Now, the students have an opportunity to articulate their ideas, and the teacher helps students clarify their ideas through scientific and technological terms and concepts. The teacher directs students’ attention to specific aspects of the engagement and exploration experiences. Explanations are ways of ordering and giving a common language for the exploratory experiences

Elaboration: The teacher provides activities based on the same concepts and skills, but there is a new and different context. The students must expand or generalize their new conceptions to the different experiences. The use of interactions within student groups as a part of the elaboration process is important. Group discussions and cooperative learning situations provide opportunities for students to express their understanding of the subject and receive feedback from others who are very close to their own level of understanding.

Evaluation: This phase may occur throughout the Learning Cycle. The teacher uses a variety of assessments to determine the students' conceptual understanding and level of skill development. This phase also is an opportunity for students to test their understanding and skills.

The instructional model proposed here is closely aligned with the actual processes used in scientific and technological enterprises. The methods of scientific inquiry and strategies of design are excellent tools for students to use in testing their explanations and solutions.

Table 1. Steps to implement the instructional teaching model 5E for teacher:

Stage of the Instructional Model / The 5E Instructional Model
What the Teacher Does
That is Consistent with This Model / That Is Inconsistent with This Model
Engage /
  • Creates interest
  • Generates curiosity
  • Raises questions
  • Elicits responses that uncover what the students know or think about the concept/topic
/
  • Explains concepts
  • Provides definitions and answers
  • States conclusions
  • Provides closure
  • Lectures

Explore /
  • Encourages the students to work together without direct instruction from the teacher
  • Observes and listens to the students as they interact
  • Asks probing questions to redirect the students’ investigations when necessary
  • Provides time for the students to puzzle through problems
  • Acts as a consultant for students
/
  • Provides answers
  • Tells or explains how to work through the problem
  • Provides closure
  • Tells the students that they are wrong
  • Gives information or facts that solve the problem
  • Leads the students step-by-step to a solution

Explain /
  • Encourages the students to explain concepts and definitions in their own words
  • Ask for justification (evidence) and clarification from students
  • Formally provides definitions, explanations, and new labels
  • Uses students’ previous experiences as basis for explaining concepts
/
  • Accepts explanations that have no justification
  • Neglects to solicit the students’ explanations
  • Introduces unrelated concepts or skill

Elaborate /
  • Expects the students to use formal labels, definitions, and explanations provided previously
  • Encourages the students to apply or extend the concepts and skills in new situations
  • Reminds the students of alternate explanations
  • Refers the students to existing data and evidence and asks: What do you already know? Why do you think…? (Strategies from Explore apply here also)
/
  • Provides definitive answers
  • Tells the students that they are wrong
  • Lectures
  • Leads students step-by-step to a solution
  • Explains how to work through the problem

Evaluate /
  • Observes the students as they apply new concepts and skills
  • Assesses students’ knowledge and/or skills
  • Looks for evidence that the students have changed their thinking or behaviors
  • Allows students to assess their own learning and group-process skills
  • Asks open-ended questions such as, Why do you think…? What evidence do you have? What do you know about x? How would you explain x?
/
  • Tests vocabulary words, terms, and isolated facts
  • Introduces new ideas or concepts
  • Creates ambiguity
  • Promotes open-ended discussion unrelated to the concept or skill

Table 2. Steps to implement the instructional teaching model 5E for the students:

Stage of the Instructional Model / The 5E Instructional Model
What the Student Does
That is Consistent with This Model / That Is Inconsistent with This Model
Engage /
  • Asks questions such as Why did this happen? What do I already know about this? What can I find out about this?
  • Shows interest in the topic
/
  • Asks for the “right” answer
  • Offers the “right” answer
  • Insists on answers or explanations
  • Seeks one solution

Explore /
  • Thinks freely, but within the limits of the activity
  • Tests predictions and hypotheses
  • Forms new predictions and hypotheses
  • Tries alternatives and discusses them with others
  • Records observations and ideas
  • Suspends judgment
/
  • Lets others do the thinking and exploring (passive involvement)
  • Works quietly with little or no interaction with others (only appropriate when exploring ideas or feelings)
  • “Plays around” indiscriminately with no goal in mind
  • Stops with one solution

Explain /
  • Explains possible solutions or answers to others
  • Listens critically to others’ explanations
  • Questions others’ explanations
  • Listens to and tries to comprehend explanations that the teacher offers
  • Refers to previous activities
  • Uses recorded observations in explanations
/
  • Proposes explanations from “thin air” with no relationship to previous experiences
  • Brings up irrelevant experiences and examples
  • Accepts explanations without justification
  • Does not attend to other plausible explanations

Elaborate /
  • Applies new labels, definitions, explanations, and skills in new but similar situations
  • Uses previous information to ask questions, propose solutions, make decisions, and design experiments
  • Draws reasonable conclusions from evidence
  • Records observations and explanations
  • Checks for understanding among peers
/
  • “Plays around” with no goal in mind
  • Ignores previous information or evidence
  • Draws conclusions from “thin air”
  • In discussion, uses only those labels that the teacher provided

Evaluate /
  • Answers open-ended questions by using observations, evidence, and previously accepted explanations
  • Demonstrates an understanding or knowledge of the concept or skill
  • Evaluates his or her own progress and knowledge
  • Asks related questions that would encourage future investigations
/
  • Draws conclusions, not using evidence or previously accepted explanations
  • Offers only yes-or-no answers and memorized definitions or explanations as answers
  • Fails to express satisfactory explanations in his or her own words
  • Introduces new, irrelevant topics

Advantage of 5e instructional teaching model (engage, explore, explain, elaborate, evaluation) from others; First, this models helps lecturer (teacher) in choosing pre steps for teaching acts. Using this model, teaching activities can be chosen by the teacher and students, so achieving instructional goals for students will be easier and faster. Second benefit, this instructional teaching model 5E(engage, explore, explain, elaborate, evaluation)can give a chance for teachers step by step, in order to make a better teaching programs.

Hypothesis

As implementing this instructional model 5E (engage, explore, explain, elaborate, evaluation), it will improve student’s ability to understand the concepts/theories, increase the way to think creatively, analyze and solve problems related to the theory they have.

Research Method

Act research is held to 5thsemester S-1 students, taking Organization Behavior, in Commercial Study Program students, Economics Department of Jakarta State University (UNJ). The research method used is classroom action research. At the beginning research is begun by an observing, idea determining, problems configuring, making hypothesis of classroom action research, and direct observing in class. Steps held in doing a classroom action research, by using recycled principles in 4 level; (1) Level of act configuring and planning, (2) Step of act realization and observing, (3) research-result reflection, (4) Plan changing/revising for further development. In actual step, research is begun with planning orientation, actualization, observing the reflection, and revision by recycling/continuity because atmosphere and development are a must in this Classroom action research. Operationally, basic procedure of act held by the researcher can be classified: 1. Orientation; 2. Planning; 3. Actualization; 4. Observation; 5. Reflection; 6. Revision