City of Chicago’s
Committee on Health
ChicagoCity Council Chambers,ChicagoCity Hall
September 9, 2008
Subject Matter: Impact of the State of Illinois Substance Use Prevention and Treatment Funding Cuts on the City of Chicago
The Community Counseling Centers of Chicago (C4), a not-for-profit mental health center, last year served over 1,100 clients with substance use problems through DASA funding. Most of these clients were served in a traditional outpatient setting and many were treated in the WestsideCorrectionalCenter as part of a work release program which transitions clients from prison back into the community through a work release program. With over 1/3 of our funding cut we have to turn away a substantial number of clients asking for help; the program at the WestsideCorrectionalCenter has been completely eliminated.
Besides the human cost of refusing care to those that ask for it, and that cost is significant, from a purely financial perspective these cuts are short sighted at best. A recent UCLA study (2005) confirmed what numerous previous studies on the subject have concluded: treatment works and has significant monetary benefits. The UCLA study found that every dollar invested in treatment generates $7 in monetary benefits including reduced crime and increased employment. Likewise, Illinois’s own TOPPS II study demonstrated significant financial benefits to a wide variety of social institutions with the availability of substance abuse treatment, especially the courts, jails, emergency rooms, and unemployment system.
Impact of Cuts on the City ofChicago
These drastic cuts in funding for clients with substance abuse and often co-occurring mental health problems have forced us to make hard choices in deciding who to turn away from treatment. Coupled with the DCFS cuts that threaten to eliminate care for families with substance exposed infants the ever widening hole in the “safety net” will have profound financial and human costs.
The Director of our Substance Abuse Program asked me how she is to choose who to treat and who to turn away.
For example, what would the consequences have been had we turned away many to whom we have provided care such as:
* A young woman with a significant substance abuse problem, multiple psychiatric diagnoses and severe uncontrolled seizures which developed in her childhood. She at times has been homeless and slept on public benches or under porches.
Through our DASA grant we have been able to help her control her substance use and stabilize her mental illnesses with medication and counseling. We helped her apply for Social Security disability. We accompanied her to appointments for her medical problems.
Today she isdrug free, has stable housing, and works part time. She continues to struggle to maintain abstinence from alcohol but is committed to her treatment and trying to remain sober.
OR:
*A man referred from a state psychiatric hospital after an inpatient stay due to alcoholism complicated by bipolar disorder. When he came to us we ensured that he met with a psychiatrist, obtained the needed medications and received counseling for his co-occurring disorders. These services were provided in an integrated manner consistent with the most recent evidenced based practices. When the client stabilized we were able to refer him to a vocational program.
Today the client remains abstinent from alcohol, his psychiatric problems are managed well with medication and weekly counseling and he has been employed part time for over one year.
OR:
*Five years ago we assisted one of our pregnant clients to gain abstinence and give birth to a healthy baby boy. She returned to us this year when she was faced with another high risk pregnancy and asked for help in reducing her risk of relapse.
Unfortunately, despite remaining drug free she gave birth prematurely and her infant son died twelve days after birth. Since returning for services she has needed significant help with case management services We have provided frequent outreach to monitor herphysical and mental health and reduce her risk of relapse. Our goal continues to be to assist this client in her recovery and optimize her ability to parent her five year old son.
These are our neighbors, our friends, and our families Whodo we decide to provide care to and who do we turn away? These choices have real human consequences. I urge you to do what you can to restore funding and allow us to care for those most vulnerable around us.
Bruce Seitzer
Community Counseling Centers of Chicago (C4)
(773)765-0663