Brussels,
SEC(2009) 712/2
COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT
Accompanying the
COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION
TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS
concerning the
European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region
ACTION PLAN
{COM(2009) 248}
{SEC(2009) 702}
{SEC(2009) 703}
February 2013 VERSION
Action Plan
for the
European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region
An integrated framework that allows the European Union and Member States to identify needs and match them to the available resources by coordinating of appropriate policies, thus enabling the Baltic Sea Region to achieve a sustainable environment and optimal economic and social development.
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION 3
Governance of the Strategy 3
Roles and responsibilities of the main stakeholders of the EUSBSR 3
Updating the Action Plan 3
Flagship projects: functions and labelling process 3
Funding Issues 3
Communicating the EUSBSR – Let’s talk about results 3
Objectives and sub-objectives of the Strategy 3
Save the Sea 3
Sub-objective: Clear water in the sea 3
Sub-objective: Rich and healthy wildlife 3
Sub-objective: Clean and safe shipping 3
Sub-objective: Better cooperation 3
Connect the Region 3
Sub-objective: Good transport conditions 3
Sub-objective: Reliable energy markets 3
Sub-objective: Connecting people in the region 3
Sub-objective: Better cooperation in fighting cross-border crime 3
Increase Prosperity 3
Sub-objective: EUSBSR as a frontrunner for deepening and fulfilling the single market 3
Sub-objective: EUSBSR contributing to the implementation of Europe 2020 Strategy 3
Sub-objective: Improved global competitiveness of the Baltic Sea Region 3
Sub-objective: Climate change adaptation, risk prevention and management 3
Priority Areas 3
PA Agri – Reinforcing sustainability of agriculture, forestry and fisheries 3
PA Bio – Preserving natural zones and biodiversity, including fisheries 3
PA Crime – Fighting cross-border crime 3
PA Culture – Developing and promoting the common culture and cultural identity 3
PA Education – Developing innovative education and youth 3
PA Energy – Improving the access to, and the efficiency and security of the energy markets 3
PA Hazards – Reducing the use and impact of hazardous substances 3
PA Health – Improving and promoting people’s health, including its social aspects 3
PA Innovation – Exploiting the full potential of the region in research and innovation 3
PA Internal Market – Removing hindrances to the internal market 3
PA Nutri – Reducing nutrient inputs to the sea to acceptable levels 3
PA Safe – To become a leading region in maritime safety and security 3
PA Secure– Protection from emergencies and accidents on land 3
PA Ship – Becoming a model region for clean shipping 3
PA SME – Promote entrepreneurship and strengthen the growth of SMEs 3
PA Tourism – Reinforcing cohesiveness of the macro-region through tourism 3
PA Transport – Improving internal and external transport links 3
Horizontal Actions 3
HA Involve – Strengthening multi-level governance including involving civil society, business and academia 3
HA Neighbours – To increase the co-operation with neighbouring countries to tackle joint challenges in the Baltic Sea region 3
HA Promo – Boosting joint promotion and regional identity building actions 3
HA Spatial Planning – Encouraging the use of Maritime and Land-based Spatial Planning in all Member States around the Baltic Sea and develop a common approach for cross-border cooperation 3
HA Sustainable development and bio-economy 3
Annex I: Completed Flagship Projects 3
Annex II: Charting how Priority Areas and Horizontal Actions address each Objective 3
Abbreviations
AIS / Automatic Identification SystemsB7 / Baltic Islands
BaltMet / The Baltic Metropoles Network
BASREC / The Baltic Sea Region Energy Cooperation Initiative
BEMIP / The Baltic Energy Market Interconnection Plan
BOCTA / The Baltic Operational Crime Assessment
BSAP / HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan
BSLF / The Baltic Sea Labour Forum
BSR / The Baltic Sea region
BSRAC / Baltic Sea Regional Advisory Council
BSRBCC / The Baltic Sea Region Border Control Cooperation
BSSSC / The Baltic Sea States Subregional Cooperation
BSTF / The Baltic Sea Tourism Forum
BSTF OPC / The Baltic Sea Task Force on Organised Crime in the Baltic Sea Region
BTO 2030 / The Baltic Transport Outlook 2030
CBSS / The Council of the Baltic Sea States
CBSS TF-THB / Task Force against Trafficking in Human Beings
CEF / Connecting Europe Facility
CF / Cohesion Fund
CFP / Common Fisheries Policy
CISE / Common Information Sharing Environment
CLLD / Community-Led Local Development
COSME / Programme for the competitiveness of enterprises and SMEs
DG ENERGY / Directorate-General for Energy
DG ENTR / Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry
DG ENV / Directorate-General for Environment
DG MARE / Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries
DG REGIO / Directorate General for Regional and Urban Policy
EAFRD / European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development
ECoC / European Capitals of Culture
EEZ / Exclusive Economic zone
EFF / European Fisheries Fund
EGCC / The Expert Group for Cooperation on Children at Risk
EIAs / Environmental Impact Assessments
EIB / European Investment Bank
EMFF / European Maritime and Fisheries Fund
ERA / European Research Area
ERDF / European Regional Development Fund
ESF / European Social Fund
EU / European Union
EUSBSR / EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region
FDI / Foreign Direct Investment
FP7 / The EU’s Seventh Framework Programme for Research
GDP / Gross domestic product
GES / Good Ecological Status
GT / Gross Tonnage
HA / Horizontal Action
HALs / Horizontal Action Leaders
HELCOM / The Helsinki Commission
HIV/AIDS / Human immunodeficiency virus / acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
HLG / High-Level Group
IALA / International Association of Aids to Navigation and Lighthouse Authorities
ICES / International Council for the Exploration of the Sea
ICT / Information and communications technology
ICZM / Integrated Coastal Zone Management
IDU / Injecting Drug Users
IMO / International Maritime Organization
IPR / Intellectual Property Rights
ISUM / Integrated Sea Use Management
ITS / Intelligent Transport Systems
JASPERS / Joint Assistance to Support Projects in European Regions
LNG / Liquefied Natural Gas
LORC / Lindoe Offshore Renewables Centre
LRIT / Long Range Identification and Tracking of Ships
MLG / Multi-Level Governance
MSFD / Marine Strategy Framework Directive
MSP / Marine Spatial Planning
MSY / Maximum Sustainable Yield
NCC / National Coordination Centers
NCM / Nordic Council of Ministers
NCP(s) / National Contact Point(s)
NDEP / The Northern Dimension Environmental Partnership
NDPC / Northern Dimension Partnership on Culture
NDPHS / The Northern Dimension Partnership in Public Health and Social Well-being
NDPTL / Northern Dimension Partnership on Transport and Logistics
NECA / Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) Emission Control Areas
NGO / Non-governmental organization
NIB / Nordic Investment Bank
PA / Priority Area
PAC(s) / Priority Area Coordinators
PCBs / Polychlorinated biphenyls
PGR / Plant Genetic Resources
POPs / Persistent Organic Pollutants
PSSA / Particularly Sensitive Sea Area
RES / Renewable energy sources
SALAR / Swedish Association for Local and Regional Authorities
SCAR / The Standing Committee on Agricultural Research
SEBA / The South East Baltic Area
SECA / Sulphur Oxide (SOx) Emission Control Area
SELEC / Southeast European Law Enforcement Centre
SFM / Sustainable Forest Management
SMEs / Small and Medium Enterprises
SOGC / CBSS Senior Officials Group for Culture
TEN-E / Trans-European Energy Network
TEN-T / Trans-European Transport Network
UBC / Union of the Baltic Cities
VASAB / Visions and Strategies around the Baltic Sea
VET / Vocational Education and Training
VTS / Vessel Traffic Service
WCO / World Customs Organisation
WFD / Water Framework Directive
WHO / World Health Organization
INTRODUCTION
In December 2007, the European Council issued its Presidency Conclusions, inviting the European Commission to present an EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea region no later than June 2009.[1] Prior to this, the European Parliament had called for a strategy to address the urgent environmental challenges arising from the increasingly visible degradation of the Baltic Sea. The Commission presented its Communication on the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region (EUSBSR) on 10 June 2009[2] alongside a detailed Action Plan prepared following intensive consultation of Member States and stakeholders. The European Council endorsed this approach – the EU’s first macro-regional strategy in October 2009.[3]
Three years have now passed since implementing the EUSBSR. Based on the experience gained so far, the Commission put forward a Communication on 23 March 2012[4] specifying the three overall objectives for the Strategy: ‘Save the Sea’, ‘Connect the Region’ and ‘Increase Prosperity’. The Communication also included concrete proposals to set of measurable indicators and targets for each objective, with the aim of facilitating monitoring, evaluation, communication, and, most importantly, results. On 26 June 2012, the General Affairs Council endorsed this Communication[5] and took note of the list of indicators and targets proposed by the task force of Member State and Commission representatives during spring 2012.
This document is the EUSBSR Action Plan updated to reflect the new objectives, indicators and targets that are fully in line with and contributes to the objectives Europe 2020 Strategy. It introduces governance of the EUSBSR in line with the guidelines for roles and responsibilities of the main implementing actors, which was also agreed by the General Affairs Council on 26 June 2012. It also presents the work structured by priority areas and horizontal actions. The Action Plan may be updated regularly as the Baltic Sea region and its context develops, following an agreement among the priority area coordinators, horizontal action leaders, the Member States and the European Commission.
Although this is a strategy of the European Union (EU), it is clear that many of the issues can only be addressed in constructive cooperation with our external partners in the region, in particular Russia. However, the Strategy cannot dictate action to third parties. Instead, it indicates issues on which cooperation is desirable and proposes platforms to this discussion and cooperation. As the European Council conclusions noted, the Northern Dimension, a common policy of the EU, Russia, Norway and Iceland, provides the basis for these external aspects of the Strategy. Other fora are also useful, such as the EU-Russia common spaces[6] and international bodies, for instance the Council of the Baltic Sea States (CBSS), the Nordic Council of Ministers or the Helsinki Commission (HELCOM). This cooperation is without prejudice to the decision-making mechanisms of these respective bodies.
A key factor of success for the Strategy is the integrated and coordinated governance of the Baltic Sea region, between sectors of society as well as between regional and local authorities in the respective countries.[7] Without such integration, the targets will be difficult to achieve. The Strategy itself is particularly important in this respect as it provides the only context within which all policies relevant to the health and prosperity of the region are addressed. Its overall success will depend on the degree to which the Strategy is given weight and attention from the highest political level in the region.
Successful implementation of the Strategy requires also the adoption of a gender perspective in the governance system and the Action Plan. Equality between men and women is a core value of the European Union. At the same time, economic and business benefits can be gained from enhancing gender equality. In order to achieve the objectives of the EUSBSR the contribution and talents of both women and men should be fully used.
Specifically, this Action Plan comprises 17 priority areas and 5 horizontal actions, which represent the main areas where the EUSBSR can contribute to improvements, either by tackling the main challenges or by seising key opportunities. Typically, one Member State coordinates each priority area or horizontal action, and they work on implementation in close contact with the Commission and all stakeholders, i.e. other Member States, regional and local authorities, inter-governmental and non-governmental bodies. Other bodies may, also be nominated to coordinate an area or action. They need to ensure that the Action Plan is consistent with all EU policies, and in particular Europe 2020 Strategy as well as the Integrated Maritime Policy, with its objectives for blue growth and the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) objective to reach good environmental status by 2020.
The priority areas are organised according to the three overall objectives of the Strategy, and one horizontal section. This distinction is for ease of analysis, but every objective covers a wide range of policies and has impacts on the other objectives: they are interlinked and interdependent. Each priority area and horizontal action starts with a presentation of the issue providing background information on the topic. Then, specific indicators and targets for the area in question are set.
By way of example, climate change will be adequately included as a cross-cutting horizontal consideration in the implementation of the Action Plan’s objectives, sub-objectives, priority areas, horizontal actions and flagship projects.
To translate this into results, there are detailed actions and flagship projects. Actions represent the main steps that are needed to achieve the agreed indicators and targets for that particular area, while flagship projects detail how to achieve (part of) the desired outcome. Importantly, flagship projects should all have a lead partner and a deadline for implementation. In some cases, actions and/or flagship projects might require a change in the policy thrust or (rarely) national legislation of the Member States in the Baltic Sea region. In others, they require financing which could be provided by private or public funding (EU, national, regional or local funds). All actions and projects should be understood without prejudice to the existing exclusive Community competences.
In a number of cases, the objective of the actions and flagship projects is to highlight areas of activity that are ongoing within the EU system or in other international frameworks, but which require greater coordination within the Baltic Sea region and consistent funding strategies to be implemented successfully. The Strategy provides a unique opportunity to do this. Work on the Action Plan should be carried out in close coordination with any such on-going developments (in particular new regulations), including at EU level, to ensure coherence and efficiency.