Test and Evaluation Strategy (TES)Peer Review Checklist

Test and Evaluation Strategy (TES)Peer Review Checklist

RVCH025Test and Evaluation Strategy (TES)Peer Review Checklist13 January 2012

Test and Evaluation Strategy (TES)Peer Review Checklist

1. Project/Increment Name: ______2. Release/Version: ______3. Peer Review Date: ______
  1. Project Manager/Office: ______
  2. State of Product: 6. Category: 7. Type of Review:

Draft Near Final Final Initial Follow-up Meeting Coordination
  1. Location of Work Product: ______
  2. Supporting Material and Location: ______
  3. Time Charge Number (JON): ______

11. PARTICIPANTS (Add or delete participants as necessary)

Reviewer

/ NAME / OFFICE / ROLE/RESPONSIBILITY / Time spent on review before meeting
A) / Leader/Facilitator
B) / Recorder
C) / Program/Project Manager
D) / Integrated Test Team (ITT) Co-Chairperson
E) / Program Test Manager
F) / Lead Engineer
G) / Lead Test Evaluator
H) / Test Manager
I) / Test Director
12. Objectives / Objective Evaluation Criteria / Respond With:
Yes / No / N/A **
A. / Does the TES describe how operational capability requirements will be tested and evaluated in support of the acquisition strategy?
B. / Has the TES been either (a) prepared as the first version of the Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) or (b) incorporated into the Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)?
C. / Does the TES identify the Integrated Developmental Test and Evaluation (IDT&E) and Operational Test and Evaluation (OT&E) Test Phases, the environments, and the planned test segments?
D. / Does the TES follow the TEScontent and format guidance in the Defense Acquisition Guidebook (DAG)?
E. / Is the TES consistent with other program documentation (e.g., Systems Engineering Plan, LCMP, etc.)?
F. / Overall, does the TES correlate to the process established in published guidance?
G. / Has the Responsible Test Organization (RTO) coordinated on the TES?
H. / Does the TES contain Scientific and Technical Information (STINFO)? If so, has the appropriate STINFO distribution statement been incorporated into the TES?

13.

Action Item Number from Section 12

/ Action Item Description / Priority / Action Assigned To: / Date Action Item Was Completed
14. Additional comments supporting the review:
15. TIME SPENT IN PEER REVIEW MEETING: ______.
16. FOLLOW-UP REVIEW REQUIRED: NO - YES (DATE: )
17. FACILITATOR SIGNATURE: ______.
18. Program/Project Manager Review: Date: ______
19. Lead Test Evaluator Review: ______Date: ______
20. Test Manager Review: ______Date: ______
21. Test Director Review: ______Date: ______

1

Top View