RVCH025Test and Evaluation Strategy (TES)Peer Review Checklist13 January 2012

Test and Evaluation Strategy (TES)Peer Review Checklist

1. Project/Increment Name: ______2. Release/Version: ______3. Peer Review Date: ______
  1. Project Manager/Office: ______
  2. State of Product: 6. Category: 7. Type of Review:

Draft Near Final Final Initial Follow-up Meeting Coordination
  1. Location of Work Product: ______
  2. Supporting Material and Location: ______
  3. Time Charge Number (JON): ______

11. PARTICIPANTS (Add or delete participants as necessary)

Reviewer

/ NAME / OFFICE / ROLE/RESPONSIBILITY / Time spent on review before meeting
A) / Leader/Facilitator
B) / Recorder
C) / Program/Project Manager
D) / Integrated Test Team (ITT) Co-Chairperson
E) / Program Test Manager
F) / Lead Engineer
G) / Lead Test Evaluator
H) / Test Manager
I) / Test Director
12. Objectives / Objective Evaluation Criteria / Respond With:
Yes / No / N/A **
A. / Does the TES describe how operational capability requirements will be tested and evaluated in support of the acquisition strategy?
B. / Has the TES been either (a) prepared as the first version of the Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) or (b) incorporated into the Life Cycle Management Plan (LCMP)?
C. / Does the TES identify the Integrated Developmental Test and Evaluation (IDT&E) and Operational Test and Evaluation (OT&E) Test Phases, the environments, and the planned test segments?
D. / Does the TES follow the TEScontent and format guidance in the Defense Acquisition Guidebook (DAG)?
E. / Is the TES consistent with other program documentation (e.g., Systems Engineering Plan, LCMP, etc.)?
F. / Overall, does the TES correlate to the process established in published guidance?
G. / Has the Responsible Test Organization (RTO) coordinated on the TES?
H. / Does the TES contain Scientific and Technical Information (STINFO)? If so, has the appropriate STINFO distribution statement been incorporated into the TES?

13.

Action Item Number from Section 12

/ Action Item Description / Priority / Action Assigned To: / Date Action Item Was Completed
14. Additional comments supporting the review:
15. TIME SPENT IN PEER REVIEW MEETING: ______.
16. FOLLOW-UP REVIEW REQUIRED: NO - YES (DATE: )
17. FACILITATOR SIGNATURE: ______.
18. Program/Project Manager Review: Date: ______
19. Lead Test Evaluator Review: ______Date: ______
20. Test Manager Review: ______Date: ______
21. Test Director Review: ______Date: ______

1