Table S1 List of Literature References Onsoil Ph, Concentrations of C, N, P, S and C-N-P-S

Table S1 List of Literature References Onsoil Ph, Concentrations of C, N, P, S and C-N-P-S

Table S1 List of literature references onsoil pH, concentrations of C, N, P, S and C-N-P-S stoichiometry in forested soils.

No. / Country / Province / Town / Tem (°C)* / Pre / TS / PL¶ / Duration / Soil properties / Reference
(mm)#
1 / Argentina / Buenos Aires / Pehuen-Co / 15.5 / 669 / CF / I / 45 / pH, SOC, TN, C:N,AP / (Amiotti et al. 2013)
2 / Argentina / Misionses, Corrientes / Santo, Candelaria, Ituzaingo, Iguazu Tome / 20 / 1600 / CF / I / 15,31,25, / SOC / (Eclesia et al. 2012)
3 / Australia / Canberra / Billy Billy / 20 / 622 / CF / I / 16 / C:N / (Guo et al. 2007)
4 / Australia / New South Wales / 10.5 / 862 / CF / I / 1,3,23 / SOC, TN,C:N / (Allen, 2009 )
5 / Australia / Victorian / 15.7 / 567 / EU / I / 5,5,21,22,28,29, / SOC, TN, C:N / (Cunningham, 2012 }
6 / Australia / Western Australia / Esperance / 16.9 / 619 / EU,CF / I / 13,13,13,13,13 / pH, SOC, TN, AN,C:N / (Carson et al. 2010)
7 / Australia / Western Australia / 15 / 865 / EU / I / 7,8,8,8,8,10 / SOC / (Mendham, 2002 }
8 / Australia / South Australia / 18 / 640 / EU,CF / I / 6,11,15,17,22,32,35,51 / SOC, TN,TP, AN,C:N, C:P, N:P / (Kasel, 2007}
9 / Brazil / Itatinga / San Paulo / 19.2 / 1370 / BF,CF / I / 20,60,60 / SOC / (Maquere et al. 2008)
10 / Brazil / Minas Gerais / Belo Oriente / 25 / 1163 / EU / I / 4,8,13,19,22,29,32,33,34 / pH,SOC / (Lima et al. 2006)
11 / Brazil / Planaltina / EmbraoaCerrados / 14.5 / 2000 / CF / I / 8,30 / SOC / (Marchao et al. 2009)
12 / Brazil / Ria Grande / San Francesisco De Paulapaulo / 14.5 / 2469 / CF, / I / 20 / pH, SOC, TN,TP, C:N, C:P, N:P, TS / (Garbin et al. 2006)
13 / Burial / Minas Gerais / Cerrado / 21 / 1540 / EU / I / 7,7,20 / pH, SOC / (Zinn et al. 2002)
14 / Canada / Saskatchewan / Prince Albert / 0.55 / 424 / CF,CF / I / 50,50 / SOC, TN, C:N / (Pinno and Bélanger 2008)
15 / Canada / Alberta / Linario, Westlock / 3 / 631 / BF / G / 2, 9, 80 / pH, SOC, TN, TP, C:N / (Arevalo et al., 2009)
16 / Canada / Quebec / 4 / 1113 / BF / G / 4 / SOC, TN, C:N / Bambrick et al., 2010
17 / Canada / Quebec / 3 / 1079 / BF / G / 4 / SOC, TN, C:N / Bambrick et al., 2010
18 / Canada / Ontario / 6 / 830 / BF,CF / G / 8, 21 / SOC, TN, TP, C:N / Bambrick et al., 2010
19 / Chile / Central Valley / Paillaco / 10.8 / 1700 / BF / I / 16,120 / pH, SOC, TN,TP, AN,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (Huygens et al. 2005)
20 / China / China / Shenmu / 8.4 / 437 / N-fixers / I / 28 / SOC, TN,TP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (Wei 2009)
21 / China / Chongqing / Beipei / 16.2 / 885 / BF / G / 15 / SOC, TN,TP, AN,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (Ren 2010; Ren et al. 2010)
22 / China / Chongqing / Changrong / 17.7 / 1117 / CF / G / 12 / SOC, TN, C:N / (Zheng et al. 2008)
23 / China / Chongqing / Hechaung / 18.1 / 1116 / CF,BF / G / 8,8 / SOC, TN,TP, AN,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (Kang et al. 2012)
24 / China / Fujian / Nan'an / 20.8 / 1500 / BF / H / 6 / pH, SOC, TN,TP,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (Li 1999)
25 / China / Fujian / Sanming / 19.5 / 1700 / BF / H / 35 / pH, SOC, TN,TP,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (Shen 2002)
26 / China / Gansu / Anding, Dingxi / 6.5 / 460 / CF / G / 3,6,10 / SOC, TN,TP, AN,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (Ding et al. 2010)
27 / China / Gansu / Anjiapo, Xian / 5.9 / 437 / N-fixers, CF / G / 25 / SOC, TN, C:N, C:P / (Chen et al. 2007; Gong et al. 2006)
28 / China / Gansu / Lianchuan, Yuzhong / 5.9 / 337 / N-fixers / H / 7,11,20,43,10,21,42,10,21,42 / pH, SOC, TN,AN,AP, C:N / (Jiang 2007)
29 / China / Gansu / Lianjiabian, Heshui / 7.4 / 587.6 / CF / H / 9,17, / pH, SOC, TN,TP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (Jia 2006)
30 / China / Guangdong / Heshan / 21.7 / 1801 / BF / H / 14 / SOC, TN,TP,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (Li et al. 2002)
31 / China / Guangdong / Heshan / 22.5 / 1534 / EU / H / 3,4 / SOC, TN, C:N / (Wu et al. 2013)
32 / China / Guangxi / Huanjiang / 18.5 / 1407 / BF / G / 5 / C:N / (Yuan et al. 2007)
33 / China / Guangxi / Pingguo / 21.5 / 1500 / BF / G / 10,10,10 / SOC, TN,AN, C:N / (Yu and Sun 2012)
34 / China / Guangxi / Yishan / 19.3 / 1169 / CF / H / 32 / SOC, TN,TP,AN,AP, C:P / (Liang et al. 1993)
35 / China / Guangxi / Yishan / 19.3 / 1169 / BF / H / 45 / SOC, TN,AP, C:N / (Liang et al. 1993)
36 / China / Guizhou / Qingzhen / 15 / 1200 / BF / G / 4 / SOC, TN,TP,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (Luo et al. 2003)
37 / China / Hainan / Jianfengge / 19.7 / 3000 / CF / H / 34 / pH, SOC, TN,TP,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (Wei et al. 2009b)
38 / China / Hebei / Saihanba / -1.4 / 450 / CF / I / 37,40 / SOC, TN, C:N / (Liu et al. 2009)
39 / China / Heilongjiang / Laoshan / 1 / 626 / CF / G / 23,26,35,45,46 / SOC, TN, C:N / (An et al. 2012)
40 / China / Heilongjiang / Nehe / 2 / 450 / BF / H / 8,8,8 / pH, SOC, TN,TP,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (Zhang et al. 1997)
41 / China / Henan / Luoning / 14.3 / 641.5 / BF / G / 3 / SOC, TN,TP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (Su et al. 2007)
42 / China / Henan / Luoning / 13.7 / 700 / BF / G / 5,28 / SOC, AN,AP / (Yun 2010)
43 / China / Hubei / Qingquan, Xishui / 16.9 / 1350 / BF / G / 13,23,75 / pH, SOC, TN, C:N / (Wei 2009)
44 / China / Hubei / Qingquan, Xishui / 16.9 / 1350 / N-fixers / G / 7 / pH, SOC, TN, C:N / (Wei 2009)
45 / China / Inner Mongolia / Duolun, Xilinguole / 1.9 / 389.4 / BF,CF / I / 26,26 / pH, SOC, TN,TP, AN,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (Wang 2007)
46 / China / Inner Mongolia / Huhehaote / 5.6 / 420 / CF / I / 10,20 / SOC, TN,TP, AN,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (Yan and Wang 1996)
47 / China / Inner Mongolia / Keerxin / 6.4 / 450 / BF / G / 5,10,15 / pH, SOC, TN,TP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (Bai 2008)
48 / China / Inner Mongolia / Shadi, Keerqin / 6.3 / 430 / CF / I / 32 / pH,SOC, TN,TP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (Hu et al. 2009)
49 / China / Inner Mongolia / Shadi, Keerqin / 6.4 / 450 / CF / I / 15,24,30 / pH, SOC, TN,TP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (Liu et al. 2010)
50 / China / Jiangsu / Nantong / 15.8 / 1064 / BF,CF / H / 7. 16,28 / SOC, TN,TP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (Yang 2005)
51 / China / Jiangsu / Wujiang / 16 / 1134 / BF,CF / G / 25, 30,35 / pH, SOC, TN, TP, C:N, TS / (Wang et al. 2010)
52 / China / Jiangxi / Taihe / 18.6 / 1360 / BF,CF / H / 9 / SOC, TN, AN,AP, C:N / (Chen 1995)
53 / China / Liaoning / Jianping / 6.5 / 476 / BF / G / 5,10,15,20 / SOC, TN, C:N / (Mao and Zeng 2010)
54 / China / Liaoning / Jianping / 6.5 / 476 / BF / G / 5,10,15,20 / SOC, TN, C:N / (Mao et al. 2009)
55 / China / Liaoning / Jianping / 5.2 / 443 / N-fixers / H / 7 / SOC, TN,AN,AP, C:N / (Jia et al. 1994; Jia and Yang 1994)
56 / China / Liaoning / Kezuo, Chaoyang / 8.2 / 500.9 / CF / H / 7,26 / pH, SOC, TN,TP,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (Shen and Jiang 1998)
57 / China / Ningxia / Guyuan / 7 / 420 / N-fixers / G / 8 / pH, SOC, TN,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (An and Huang 2006)
58 / China / Ningxia / Hechaun, Guyuan / 7 / 420 / N-fixers / G / 3, 13, 23 / SOC, TN,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (Chen et al. 2010)
59 / China / Ningxia / Yanchi / 8.46 / 276.3 / N-fixers / I / 7,12,27 / SOC, TN, AN,AP, C:N / (Song et al. 2012)
60 / China / Qinghai / Datong / 2.9 / 556 / N-fixers / G / 6,9 / pH, SOC, TN,C:N / (Shi et al. 2015)
61 / China / Qinghai / Delingha / 3.6 / 38 / Mixed / G / 9,9,9 / pH, SOC, TN,C:N / (Shi et al. 2015)
62 / China / Qinghai / Delingha / 2.7 / 185 / BF / G / 3,9 / pH, SOC, TN,C:N / (Shi et al. 2015)
63 / China / Qinghai / Dulan / 2.7 / 198 / BF / G / 9,27,33 / pH, SOC, TN,C:N / (Shi et al. 2015)
64 / China / Qinghai / Gangcha / -1.3 / 380 / N-fixers / G / 8,9,9 / pH, SOC, TN,C:N / (Shi et al. 2015)
65 / China / Qinghai / Geermu / 4.3 / 41.2 / N-fixers / G / 9.9 / pH, SOC, TN,C:N / (Shi et al. 2015)
66 / China / Qinghai / Gonghe / 4 / 318 / Mixed / H / 9,11 / pH, SOC, TN,C:N / (Shi et al. 2015)
67 / China / Qinghai / Guide / 7.2 / 252 / N-fixer / G / 13,13,13,13 / pH, SOC, TN,C:N / (Shi et al. 2015)
68 / China / Qinghai / Haiyan / 3 / 400 / Mixed / G / 10,23 / pH, SOC, TN,C:N / (Shi et al. 2015)
69 / China / Qinghai / Haiyan / 0.2 / 350 / N-fixers / G / 14,29,29 / pH, SOC, TN,C:N / (Shi et al. 2015)
70 / China / Qinghai / Huzhu / 0.9 / 650 / N-fixers / H / 3,9,11,29 / pH, SOC, TN,C:N / (Shi et al. 2015)
71 / China / Qinghai / Ledu / 7.3 / 330 / BF / G / 8,11,11,11 / pH, SOC, TN,C:N / (Shi et al. 2015)
72 / China / Qinghai / Meiyuan / 0.85 / 523 / N-fixers / G / 8 / pH, SOC, TN,C:N / (Shi et al. 2015)
73 / China / Qinghai / Pingan / 1.4 / 450 / Mixed / G / 26 / pH, SOC, TN,C:N / (Shi et al. 2015)
74 / China / Qinghai / Rongmuhuang / 4.3 / 43 / Mixed / H / 4,21,31,57 / pH, SOC, TN,C:N / (Shi et al. 2015)
75 / China / Qinghai / Tianjun / 4.3 / 41.2 / N-fixers / G / 8,8 / pH, SOC, TN,C:N / (Shi et al. 2015)
76 / China / Qinghai / Wulan / 4.2 / 180 / N-fixers / G / 9,9,10,21 / pH, SOC, TN,C:N / (Shi et al. 2015)
77 / China / Qinghai / Xiangride / 3.9 / 168 / BF / G / 8 / pH, SOC, TN,C:N / (Shi et al. 2015)
78 / China / Shaanxi / Ansai / 8.8 / 505.3 / CF / G / 10,10,30 / SOC, TN, C:N / (Han et al. 2012)
79 / China / Shaanxi / Ansai / 8.8 / 541 / BF / G / 2,5,27,30 / SOC, TN,TP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (Dong et al. 2008)
80 / China / Shaanxi / Ansai / 8.8 / 505.3 / BF / G / 30 / SOC, TN, C:N / (Han et al. 2012)
81 / China / Shaanxi / Ansai / 8.8 / 505.3 / BF, CF, MF / G / 30,30 / pH, SOC, TN,TP,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (Dai et al. 2008)
82 / China / Shaanxi / Ansai / 8.8 / 545.2 / N-fixers / G / 10,17,26,34,40,50 / SOC, TN,TP,C:N, C:P, N:P / (Cui et al. 2012)
83 / China / Shaanxi / Ansai / 8.8 / 505.3 / N-fixers / G / 10,30 / SOC, TN, C:N / (Han et al. 2012)
84 / China / Shaanxi / Ansai / 8.8 / 505 / N-fixers, BF, CF, Mixed / G / 30,30,30,30,30, / pH, SOC, TN,TP, AN,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (Xue et al. 2007)
85 / China / Shaanxi / Fuxian / 9 / 567.7 / N-fixers / H / 10,20,40,50 / SOC, TN,AP, C:N / (Lu etal., 2009)
86 / China / Shaanxi / Huaiping, Yongshou / 10.8 / 601.3 / CF, BF / H / 10, 25, 44 / SOC, TN,TP, AN,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (Zhang and Chang 2006)
87 / China / Shaanxi / Huaiping, Yongshou / 10.8 / 601.3 / BF / H / 10,44, / SOC, TN,TP, AN,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (Wang et al. 2007)
88 / China / Shaanxi / Mizhi / 8.4 / 422 / CF / G / 24,49 / SOC, TN, C:N,AP / (Dong and Zheng 2008)
89 / China / Shaanxi / Shenmu / 8.4 / 437 / CF / I / 28,35 / pH, SOC, TN,TP, AP, C:N / (Wei et al. 2009a)
90 / China / Shaanxi / Wuqi / 7.8 / 480 / BF / G / 60 / SOC, TN,TP, AP, C:N / (Jiao et al. 2006)
91 / China / Shaanxi / Wuqi / 7.8 / 480 / N-fixers / G / 4,9,18,33 / SOC, TN,TP, C:N / (Wang et al. 2010)
92 / China / Shaanxi / Wuqi / 7.8 / 480 / N-fixers / G / 18 / SOC, AN,AP / (Jiao et al., 2006)
93 / China / Shaanxi / Xunyi / 7 / 580 / CF / H / 12,17,22,28,32,42,65,70, / pH, SOC, TN, AN,AP, C:N / (Wang et al. 2007)
94 / China / Shaanxi / Zhifanggou, Ansai / 8.8 / 549 / N-fixers / H / 10,22,26,30 / SOC, TN,TP,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (Zhang et al. 2007)
95 / China / Shaanxi / Qianyang / 10.8 / 653 / CF / G / 20 / SOC,AN, AP / (Hu et al. 2007)
96 / China / Shandong / Dezhou / 13.1 / 650 / BF / G / 4,7 / SOC, TN / (Zhang et al. 2008)
97 / China / Shanxi / Wuzhai / 1.5 / 435 / N-fixers / H / 1,2,3,4 / pH, SOC, TN,,AP, C:N / (Niu et al. 2003)
98 / China / Shanxi / Wuzhai / 4 / 454 / N-fixers / H / 5,15,25 / SOC, TN,AP, C:N / (Ji et al. 2007)
99 / China / Sichuan / Danlen / 16.6 / 1233 / BF / G / 3 / SOC, TN,AN,AP, C:N / (Ma et al. 2010)
100 / China / Sichuan / Hongya / 14.3 / 1560 / BF / G / 4,5,6,7, / SOC, TN, C:N / (Chen et al. 2008)
101 / China / Sichuan / Hongya / 14.3 / 1560 / BB / G / 7 / SOC, TN,TP,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (Yan,et al., 2008)
102 / China / Yunnan / Dongchuang / 15.7 / 828 / N-fixers / I / 7,7,7,11 / pH, SOC, TN,TP, AN,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (Shen et al. 2002)
103 / China / Yunnan / Xiaohenshan, Yuanmei / 21.9 / 630.8 / BF / H / 6,13,13,13 / pH, SOC, TN,TP, AN,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (Li et al. 2006)
104 / China / Yunnan / Xishuangbanna / 22.1 / 1400 / BF / G / 3,7,20 / SOC, TN,AN, C:N / (Yang et al. 2004)
105 / China / Zhejiang / Lanxi / 17.3 / 1700 / BF / H / 17,32 / SOC, TN, C:N / (Jiang and Zhou 2003)
106 / China / Zhejiang / Linan / 15.9 / 1424 / CF, N-fixers / H / 32, 32 / SOC, TN,TP, AN,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (Jiang et al. 2007)
107 / Congo / Pointe Noire / 25 / 1200 / EU / I / 7.5,17,30 / SOC / (Mendez-Millan, 2014)
108 / Ecuador / Aglomerados Cotopaxi / Cotopaxi / 8.1 / 1130 / CF / I / 7.5,17.5,22.5 / pH, SOC, TN,TP, AN,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (Farley and Kelly 2004)
109 / Ecuador / Ecuadorian Andes / 21.5 / 3200 / N-fixers, Mixed, EU / G / 7.5,17.5 / SOC / (Rhoades, 2000 )
110 / Ethiopia / Amhara / Bahir Dar / 21.7 / 1500 / EU / G / 5.5,5.5 / SOC, TN, C:N / (Engda et al.)
111 / Ethiopia / Amhara / Selam / 25 / 550 / EU / I / 16,16, / SOC, TN, C:P,AP / (Girmay and Singh 2012)
112 / Ethiopia / Atnogo / Belete Forest / 19.4 / 1517 / CF, EU / G / 22,22,22, / pH, SOC / (Lemma et al. 2006)
113 / Ethiopia / Lepis / Ganbo / 20 / 1200 / EU, CF / G / 15,17 / SOC, TN, AP / (Lemenih et al. 2004)
114 / Ethiopia / Mailarly / 20 / 1200 / EU, CF / G / 30,30 / SOC, TN,C:N / (Poultouchidou, 2012)
115 / Finland / 6 Sampling Sites / Tammisaari, Tammela, Vilppula, Petajavesi, Kalvia, Toholampi / 5.7 / 620 / CF, Mixed / G / 8,8,8,9,9,9,9,18,18,18,18,18,19,19,19, / pH, SOC, TN,TP, AN,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (Karhu et al. 2011)
116 / Germany / Canstein / Wideshausen / 8 / 760 / BF / I / 7 / pH, SOC, TN,TP, AN,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (Jug et al. 1999)
117 / Germany / Waren / Gulzow / 8.2 / 543 / BF / I / 6,12 / pH, SOC, TN,TP, AP / (Kahle et al. 2007)
118 / Germany / Waren / Vipperow / 8 / 640 / BF / I / 6,12 / pH, SOC, TN,TP, AP / (Kahle et al. 2007)
119 / Iceland / Dooary, Clontycoe, Baunoge, Glenbarrow / 9.6 / 800 / CF / I / 9,16,30,45,47 / pH, SOC / (Black et al. 2009)
120 / Iceland / Hallormsstadur / 3.4 / 735 / CF / H / 14,21,26,39,53,97 / SOC,TN,TP,AN,AP,C:N, C:P, N:P / (Ritter 2007)
121 / Iceland / Hallormsstadur / 3.4 / 735 / BF / H / 53 / pH, SOC, TN,TP,C:N, C:P, N:P / (Ritter 2007)
122 / India / Assam / Banthra / 25.5 / 900 / BF / G / 4,4,4,4 / SOC, TN, C:N / (Srivastava et al. 2014)
123 / India / Uttar Pradesh / 25 / 977 / N-fixers, BF, EU / H / 3,3,3 / SOC, TN,C:N / (Mishra, 2003 )
124 / Iran / Mazandaran / Sari / 16.8 / 733 / BF,CF / G / 21,21,21 / SOC, TN, C:N / (Kooch et al. 2012)
125 / Italy / Sicilian Channel / Pantelleria / 17 / 860 / EU,BF / G / 40 / SOC / (Novara et al. 2011)
126 / Italy / Udine / Flaibana / 13.5 / 1200 / BF, N-Fixers / G / 20 / SOC, C:N / (Del Galdo et al. 2003)
127 / Lithuania / Akademija / 6.1 / 640 / CF / G / 50,50 / SOC, TN, C:N / (Armolaitis, 2013 )
128 / Mexico / Oaxaca, Juquila / 21 / 1917 / CF, Mixed / G / 15,45,75,15,45,75 / SOC,N:P / (Bautista-Cruz, 2005)
129 / New Zealand / Central South Island / Craigieburn / 2 / 1400 / CF / I / 20 / pH, SOC, TN,TP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (Chen et al. 2000)
130 / New Zealand / Central South Island / Okuku / 10 / 1200 / CF / I / 25 / pH, SOC, TN,TP, C:N, C:P, N:P, TS, Sulfate / (Davis et al., 1991; 2001)
131 / New Zealand / Central South Island / Teviotade,Craigieburn / 10 / 800 / CF / I / 10,10,20,15,23,30,47,52 / pH, SOC, TN,TP, C:N, C:P, N:P, TS, Sulfate / (Davis, 1998, 2001)
132 / Lammerlaw,Lake Dia, Tara , Benmore ,Lyndon
133 / New Zealand / Christchurch / Craigieburn / 8 / 1440 / CF / I / 15,17 / pH, SOC, TN, C:N / (Alfredsson et al. 1998)
134 / New Zealand / Manawatu / 13.2 / 960 / CF / I / 13,16,18,20,24,30, / pH, SOC, TN, C:N / (Giddens et al. 1997)
135 / New Zealand / Northland / Hill / 9.5 / 1400 / CF / I / 17,17,19 / pH, SOC, TN, C:N, TS, Sulfate / (Groenendijk et al. 2002)
136 / New Zealand / Palmerston / Massey / 12.2 / 1291 / CF / I / 20 / pH, SOC, TN, C:N / (Parfitt et al. 1997)
137 / New Zealand / Rotorua / Purukohukohu / 10 / 1500 / CF / I / 19 / pH, SOC, TN,TP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (Ross et al. 1999)
138 / New Zealand / Marton, Ohakune, Westmere / 10.9 / 1353 / BF, CF / I / 20,20,20,100,100 / SOC, TN,TP,AP, C:N / (Sparling et al. 2000)
139 / Puerto Rico / Lajas. / 25 / 1100 / N-fixers / I / 7 / SOC, TN, C:N / (Resh et al. 2002)
140 / Puerto Rico / Toa Baja / 27 / 1600 / N-fixers / I / 15 / SOC, TN, C:N / (Resh et al. 2002)
141 / Puerto Rico / Sierra De Cayey / 21 / 2000 / BF / I / 10,20,30,60,80 / pH, SOC, TN,TP, AN,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (Marin‐spiotta et al. 2009)
142 / Russia / Krasnoyarsk / 1.6 / 500 / CF, BF / I / 27,27,27,27,27,27, / pH, SOC, TN,TP, C:N, Sulfate / (Menyailo, 2002 )
143 / Turkey / Artvin / 14.5 / 350 / N-fixer, Mixed / H / 10,10 / SOC, TN, C:N / (Yüksek, 2012 )
144 / UK / Cork, Mallow, Cashel Et Al., / 9 / 1200 / BF, CF, Mixed / I / 17,18,19,20,22,22,33,34,37,41,51,42,68,67,68 / SOC / (Wellock 2011)
145 / UK / Harpenden / West Common / 9.5 / 647 / N-fixers / G / 23,85,117 / pH, SOC / (Poulton et al. 2003)
146 / Uruguay / Florida, San Jose De Mayo / Anise, Anise, Barrios,SanPdero / 18.5 / 1261 / BF, EU / I / 12,19,10,30,28,50,20,45,15 / SOC,TN,AN / (Berthrong et al. 2012)
147 / US / Chinchuck / Kamae / 21 / 4000 / BF, N-fixers / G / 16 / SOC, TN, C:N / (Resh et al. 2002)
148 / US / Georgia / Newton / 19.3 / 1370 / CF / G / 3,7,14,200 / pH, SOC, TN,TP,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P / (Markewitz et al. 2002)
149 / US / Hawaii / Hakalau / 20 / 4600 / EU / G / 2,4,10 / pH, SOC, TN, C:N / (Zou and Bashkin 1998)
150 / US / Hawaii / Hamakua / 21 / 3800 / EU / G / 12 / pH, SOC / (Bashkin and Binkley 1998)
151 / US / Hawaii / Kamae / 21 / 4000 / N-fixers / G / 15 / SOC, TN, C:N / (Song et al. 2013)
152 / US / Iowa / Allamakee / 8.2 / 871 / CF, BF / G / 51 / SOC, TN,C:N / (Sauer et al. 2012)
153 / US / Michigan / Cass / 10 / 940 / CF,BF / G / 50,53 / SOC, TN,TP, C:N / (Morris et al. 2007)
154 / US / Michigan / Kellogg / 9.7 / 890 / BF, Mixed / G / 10,10,200 / SOC / (DeGryze et al. 2004)
155 / US / Nebraska / Halsey / 10.9 / 800 / CF, Mixed / I / 25,25,55,72 / SOC, TN,AP, C:N / (Mellor et al. 2013)
156 / US / Nebraska / Syracuse / 10.9 / 800 / BF / I / 130 / pH, SOC, TN,AP, C:N / (Martens et al. 2004)
157 / US / Oregon / Corvallis / 10.4 / 1024 / CF / I / 11 / SOC, TN, C:N / (Sharrow and Ismail 2004)
158 / US / South Carolina / Union / 16 / 1170 / CF / G / 6,15,20,28,35,43 / pH, SOC, TN,C:N, / (Mobley et al. 2015; Richter et al. 1999)
159 / US / North Dakoto / Mandan / 4 / 400 / N-fixers / I / 18, 43 / SOC, TN, AN / (Springsteen, et al., 2010)
160 / US / Oregon / Columbia Plateau / 11.4 / 219 / BF / G / 7,8,9 / SOC, TN, C:N / (Sartori et al., 2007)
161 / US / Illinois / Pope Country / 13.8 / 1020 / CF, BF / G / pH, SOC, TN / (Rolfe & Boggess, 1973)
162 / US / Florida / Suwannee, Osceola / 22.11 / 1390 / CF / I / 40, 45 / SOC / (Nair ET AL., 2007)
163 / US / Kanasas / Flint Hill / 12 / 835 / CF / I / 45 / SOC, TN, C:N / (McKinley & Blair, 2008)
164 / US / Virginia / Piedmont / 13 / 1085 / CF / G / 15, 60 / SOC, TN, TP / (Hosner & Graney, 1970)
165 / US / Minnesota / 3.4 / 604.5 / BF / G, I / 6,7,6,15,7 / SOC / (GrigalBerguson, 1998)
166 / US / Hawaii / Hillo / 21 / 4000 / BF / G / 3 / pH, C:N / (Binkley and Resh 1999)

*Mean annual temperature (MAT,°C)

#Mean annual precipitation (MAP, mm year-1)

Tree species (TS), the abbreviations of EU,CFBFMixed and N-fixers were Eucalyptus, coniferous species, broadleaf species, mixed forests with broadleaf and coniferous species, and for plantation with N-fixers, respectively.

¶Prior land-use (PL),the abbreviationsH, G andI were barren land, croplandand grassland, respectively.

References

  1. Alfredsson H, Condron LM, Clarholm M, Davis MR (1998) Changes in soil acidity and organic matter following the establishment of conifers on former grassland in New Zealand. Forest Ecology and Management 112: 245-252.
  2. Allen D, Mendham D, Cowie A, Wang W, Dalal R, Raison R (2009) Nitrous oxide and methane emissions from soil are reduced following afforestation of pasture lands in three contrasting climatic zones. Soil Research 47: 443-458.
  3. Amiotti NM, Zalba P, Ares A, Rossi JM (2013) Coniferous afforestation increases soil carbon in maritime sand dunes. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 59: 289-304. doi: 10.1080/03650340.2011.627326.
  4. An J, Wang WJ, Wang HY, Su DX, Qing L, Zu YG (2012) Effect of forest and farm on vertical patterns of soil carbon,nitrogen and other parameters in Northeast China. Bulletin of Botanical Research 32.147: 331-338.
  5. An SS, Huang YM (2006) Study on the ameliorate benefits of caragana korshinskii shrubwood to soil properties in Loess Hilly Area. Scientia Silvae Sinicae: 70-74.
  6. Armolaitis K, Aleinikovienė J, Lubytė J, Žėkaitė V, Garbaravičius P (2013) Stability of soil organic carbon in agro and forest ecosystems on Arenosol. Žemdirbystė (Agriculture) 100: 227-234.
  7. Arevalo, C.B.M., Bhatti, J.S., Chang, S.X. & Sidders, D. (2009) Ecosystem carbon stocks and distribution under different land-uses in north central Alberta, Canada. Forest Ecology And Management, 257, 1776-1785.
  8. Bai XS (2008) Effects of farmland afforestation on ecosystem carbon stock and its distribution pattern in semi-arid region of Northwest China. Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou.Master degree desertation.
  9. Bambrick, A.D., Whalen, J.K., Bradley, R.L., Cogliastro, A., Gordon, A.M., Olivier, A. & Thevathasan, N.V. (2010) Spatial heterogeneity of soil organic carbon in tree-based intercropping systems in Quebec and Ontario, Canada. Agroforestry Systems, 79, 343-353.
  10. Bashkin MA, Binkley D (1998) Changes in soil carbon following afforestation in Hawaii. Ecology 79: 828-833.
  11. Bautista-Cruz A, del Castillo RF (2005) Soil changes during secondary succession in a tropical montane cloud forest area. Soil Science Society of America Journal 69: 906-914.
  12. Berthrong S, Piñeiro G, Jobbagy E, Jackson R (2012) Soil C and N changes with afforestation of grasslands across gradients of precipitation and plantation age. Ecological Applications.
  13. Binkley D, Resh SC (1999) Rapid changes in soils following Eucalyptus afforestation in Hawaii. Soil Science Society of America Journal 63: 222-225.
  14. Black K, Byrne KA, Mencuccini M, Tobin B, Nieuwenhuis M, Reidy B, Bolger T, Saiz G, Green C, Farrell ET (2009) Carbon stock and stock changes across a Sitka spruce chronosequence on surface-water gley soils. Forestry 82: 255-272.
  15. Carson JK, Gleeson DB, Clipson N, Murphy DV (2010) Afforestation alters community structure of soil fungi. Fungal biology 114: 580-584.
  16. Chen C, Condron L, Davis M, Sherlock R (2000) Effects of afforestation on phosphorus dynamics and biological properties in a New Zealand grassland soil. Plant and Soil 220: 151-163.
  17. Chen L, Gong J, Fu B, Huang Z, Huang Y, Gui L (2007) Effect of land use conversion on soil organic carbon sequestration in the loess hilly area, loess plateau of China. Ecological Research 22: 641-648.
  18. Chen XH, Zhang J, Zhao AJ, Yu HQ (2008) Soil organic carbon and nitrogen dynamics of forest(bamboo)-grass compound vegetation in initial of conversion cropland to forest. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 95: 126-130+140.
  19. Chen Y, An SS, Li BH, Li DH (2010) Soil nutrient and microbial biomass in the Loess hilly area of Ningxia under different plant rehabilitation patterns. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture 18: 261-266.
  20. Chen YR (1995) Research on soil Fertility changes in artificial forest of different types. Natural and Resource: 46-51.
  21. Cui J, Chen YM, Huang JJ, Wang QF, Yao ZJ, Zhang F (2012) Soil carbon sequestration characteristics of Caragana microphylla plantations and influencing factors in Loess Hilly Semiarid Region. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture 20: 1197-1203.
  22. Cunningham S, Metzeling K, Mac Nally R, Thomson J, Cavagnaro T (2012) Changes in soil carbon of pastures after afforestation with mixed species: sampling, heterogeneity and surrogates. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 158: 58-65.
  23. Dai QH, Liu GB, Jiang J, Xue J, Zhai S (2008) Efect of soil enzyme activities under different vegetation restoration in eroded hilly Loess Plateau. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin No.171: 429-434.
  24. Davis MR, Lang MH (1991) Increased nutrient availability in topsoils under conifers in the South Island high country. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 21: 165-179.
  25. Davis M (1998) Soil impacts of afforestation in the high country. New Zealand Forestry 42: 34-38.
  26. Davis M (2001) Soil properties under pine forest and pasture at two hill country sites in Canterbury. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 31: 3-17.
  27. DeGryze S, Six J, Paustian K, Morris SJ, Paul EA, Merckx R (2004) Soil organic carbon pool changes following land‐use conversions. Global Change Biology 10: 1120-1132.
  28. Del Galdo I, Six J, Peressotti A, Francesca Cotrufo M (2003) Assessing the impact of land‐use change on soil C sequestration in agricultural soils by means of organic matter fractionation and stable C isotopes. Global Change Biology 9: 1204-1213.
  29. Ding WG, Wei YL, Niu HW (2010) Impact of vegetation regeneration on soil nutrient variation in central arid region of Gansu province. Ecology and Environmental Sciences 19: 2568-2573.
  30. Dong LL, Zheng FL (2008) Characteristics of soil enzyme activities and nutrients under various landuse in the Loessial hilly-gully region. Ecology and Environmental Sciences 17: 2050-2058.
  31. Dong LN, Luo WL, Han FP, Zhang XC (2008) Influence of the vegetation restoration process on nutrient in zhifanggou watershed. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences: 6407-6409.
  32. Eclesia RP, Jobbagy EG, Jackson RB, Biganzoli F, Pineiro G (2012) Shifts in soil organic carbon for plantation and pasture establishment in native forests and grasslands of South America. Global Change Biology 18: 3237-3251. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02761.x.
  33. Engda TA, Kassahun HT, Collick AS, Adissu T, Ashagrie BB, Tessema ZK, Derebe A, Solomon D, Steenhus TS Soil properties and fertility status dynamics of north western Ethiopia as Influenced by Land Use Changes: Case of Dibanke Watershed.
  34. Farley KA, Kelly EF (2004) Effects of afforestation of a páramo grassland on soil nutrient status. Forest Ecology and Management 195: 281-290.
  35. Garbin ML, Zandavalli RB, Dillenburg LR (2006) Soil patches of inorganic nitrogen in subtropical Brazilian plant communities with Araucaria angustifolia. Plant and Soil 286: 323-337.
  36. Giddens KM, Parfitt RL, Percival HJ (1997) Comparison of some soil properties underPinus radiataand improved pasture. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 40: 409-416. doi: 10.1080/00288233.1997.9513262.
  37. Girmay G, Singh B (2012) Changes in soil organic carbon stocks and soil quality: land-use system effects in northern Ethiopia. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B-Soil & Plant Science 62: 519-530.
  38. Gong J, Chen L, Fu B, Huang Y, Huang Z, Peng H (2006) Effect of land use on soil nutrients in the loess hilly area of the Loess Plateau, China. Land Degradation & Development 17: 453-465. doi: 10.1002/ldr.701.
  39. Grigal, D.F. & Berguson, W.E. (1998) Soil carbon changes associated with short-rotation systems. Biomass and Bioenergy, 14, 371-377.
  40. Groenendijk F, Condron L, Rijkse W (2002) Effects of afforestation on organic carbon, nitrogen and sulfur concentrations in New Zealand hill country soils. Geoderma 108: 91-100.
  41. Guo LB, Wang M, Gifford RM (2007) The change of soil carbon stocks and fine root dynamics after land use change from a native pasture to a pine plantation. Plant and Soil 299: 251-262. doi: 10.1007/s11104-007-9381-7.
  42. Han XH, Yang GH, Tong XG, Feng YZ, Ren GX, Zhao FZ, Du YH (2012) Soil carbon and nitrogen sequestration under several different forest lands converted by farmland in Loess Hilly Area. Journal of Agro-Environment Science v.31;No.122: 1172-1179.
  43. Hosner, J.F. & Graney, D.L. (1970) The relative growth of three forest tree species on soils associated with different successional stages in Virginia. American Midland Naturalist, 418-427.
  44. Hu JB, Yang GH, Zhang XP, Feng YZ (2007) Effects of various vegetative restoration patterns on soil fertility. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences No.386: 69-72.
  45. Hu YL, Zeng DH, Jiang T (2009) Effects of afforested poplar plantations on the stock and distribution of C,N,P at Keerqin Sandy Lands(in Chinese). Acta Ecological Sinica: 4206-4214.
  46. Huygens D, Boeckx P, Van Cleemput O, Oyarzun C, Godoy R (2005) Aggregate and soil organic carbon dynamics in South Chilean Andisols. Biogeosciences 2: 159-174.
  47. Ji RR, Zhang Q, Yang Z, Zhang JJ, Wang L (2007) Soil Fertility Characteristics Induced by Caragana microphylla Plantation at Different Growing Stage on Loess Plateau in North-west of Shanxi Province. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences: 51-54.
  48. Jia GM (2006) The Effects of Vegetation Succession and Land Management on soil nutrient, activity and structure of microbial community in the Loess Plateau of Northwest China. Lanzhou University, Lanzhou. Doctoral degree desertation.
  49. Jia TH, Liu SM, Zhang GC (1994) The ecological effectiveness of forest using to water and soil conversation in west Liaoning. Journal of Liaoning Forestry Science & Technology: 26-29+19.
  50. Jia TH, Yang LH (1994) The daption of Hippophae rhamnoides in different soil types in west Liaoning. Journal of Liaoning Forestry Science & Technology: 46-48.
  51. Jiang JP (2007) Co-variation of vegetation and soil quality during ecosystem restoration in the hilly region of the semiarid Loess Plateau. Lanzhou University, Lanzhou.Doctoral degree desertation.
  52. Jiang PK, Xu QF, Zhou GM, Wu JS, Qian XB (2007) Abundance of Soil nutrients and labile organic carbon responsive to afforestation on abandoned limestone Hill. Scientia Silvae Sinicae: 39-42.
  53. Jiang PK, Zhou GM (2003) Changes in soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen under eroded red soil by vegetation recovery. Journal of Soil Water Conservation: 112-114+127.
  54. Jiao JY, Jiao F, Wen ZM (2006) Soil water and nutrients of vegetation communities under different restoration types on the hilly-gullied Loess Plateau. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science: 667-674.
  55. Jug A, Makeschin F, Rehfuess K, Hofmann-Schielle C (1999) Short-rotation plantations of balsam poplars, aspen and willows on former arable land in the Federal Republic of Germany. III. Soil ecological effects. Forest Ecology and Management 121: 85-99.
  56. Kahle P, Hildebrand E, Baum C, Boelcke B (2007) Long-term effects of short rotation forestry with willows and poplar on soil properties. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 53: 673-682. doi: 10.1080/03650340701648484.
  57. Kang M, Feng L, Sun BP, Wang TS (2012) Research on sloping cropland soil improvement effects after returning farmland to forest in hechuan district of chongqing. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin 28: 89-94.
  58. Karhu K, Wall A, Vanhala P, Liski J, Esala M, Regina K (2011) Effects of afforestation and deforestation on boreal soil carbon stocks—comparison of measured C stocks with Yasso07 model results. Geoderma 164: 33-45.
  59. Kasel S, Bennett LT (2007) Land-use history, forest conversion, and soil organic carbon in pine plantations and native forests of south eastern Australia. Geoderma 137: 401-413.
  60. Kooch Y, Hosseini SM, Zaccone C, Jalilvand H, Hojjati SM (2012) Soil organic carbon sequestration as affected by afforestation: the Darab Kola forest (north of Iran) case study. Journal of Environmental Monitoring 14: 2438-2446.
  61. Lemenih M, Gidyelew T, Teketay D (2004) Effects of canopy cover and understory environment of tree plantations on richness, density and size of colonizing woody species in southern Ethiopia.
Top View