Supplementary Table 4 The screening method in the determination of 124 identified victims. The remains with the highest LR is shown in all cases. In row 1 there was one family with 13 members missing, 4 of which were identified by the methods shown in column 4. In row 1 column 5, there were 2 different families, each of which had 2 missing and 2 were identified by the method shown.

Familya / Missing / Identified
victim / Method / Family / Missing / Identified
victim / Method
1 / 13 / 4 / CCaP, PCaP, SSaSx2b / 2 / 2 / 2 / CCaPx2
1 / 12 / 4 / CCaPx2, SSaSx2 / 1 / 8 / 2 / PCaCx2
1 / 11 / 4 / CCaPx2, PCaP, SSaS, / 1 / 10 / 1 / SSaS
1 / 9 / 4 / PCaP, SSaS, PCaCx2 / 1 / 8 / 1 / PCaC
1 / 4 / 4 / PCaCx2, PCaPx2 / 1 / 7 / 1 / PCaC
1 / 16 / 3 / PCaPx2, SSaS / 1 / 5 / 1 / UaNc
1 / 14 / 3 / CCaPx2, SSaS / 1 / 6 / 1 / CCaP
1 / 10 / 3 / CCaPx3 / 1 / 5 / 1 / SSaS
1 / 9 / 3 / CCaP, PCaCx2 / 2 / 5 / 1 / CaP
1 / 5 / 3 / CCaP, PCaCx2 / 1 / 4 / 1 / SSaS
1 / 4 / 3 / CaPaP, PCaCx2 / 1 / 4 / 1 / PPaC
1 / 3 / 3 / CCaP, PCaCx2 / 1 / 4 / 1 / PaC
1 / 10 / 2 / CCaPx2 / 4 / 3 / 1 / PCaC
1 / 8 / 2 / CCaP, CaPaP / 1 / 3 / 1 / CaP
3 / 7 / 2 / CCaPx2 / 1 / 3 / 1 / SaS
1 / 6 / 2 / CCaPx2 / 2 / 2 / 1 / CCaP
1 / 6 / 2 / CCaP, SSaS / 1 / 2 / 1 / SSaS
1 / 6 / 2 / PaPaC, PCaP / 3 / 2 / 1 / CaP
1 / 5 / 2 / PCaCx2 / 1 / 2 / 1 / SaS
1 / 4 / 2 / CCaPx2 / 3 / 1 / 1 / PCaC
2 / 2 / 2 / CCaP, PCaC / 4 / 1 / 1 / PCaP
2 / 2 / 2 / PCaPx2 / 3 / 1 / 1 / PaC
1 / 2 / 2 / CCaP,CaPaP / 13 / 1 / 1 / CaP

a this column shows the numbers of different families from which missing persons were reported, and the method used to identify human remains. There were 27 families in total in this column. The table continues with column 5 showing a further 50 families.

b SSaSx2 designates two victims identified by the method SSaS.

C Denotes the case with rare allele described in the text; the screening method is uncle searching a putative niece.