Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology Society / /
Holm Conference on
Electrical Contacts

Reviewer:Paper No.:

Address:

Title:

Author:

Submitted for: ____ Holm Conference ____ CPMTMeeting Date:

Please complete review by: / Please return review form immediately if you cannot complete the review by the indicated date!
PLACE A CHECK IN THE BOXES WHICH, IN YOUR OPINION, BEST DESCRIBE THE FEATURES OF THE MANUSCRIPT /
Poor /
Marginal /
Acceptable /
Good / Prize Paper Quality
Originality of the Work:
Significance of the Work:
Completeness of the Reported Work:
Reference to the Work of Others:
Organization of the Manuscript:
Clarity in Writing, Tables, Graphs, & Figures:

An evaluation of “Marginal” or “Poor” in any box puts the paper below the IEEE CPMT standards of acceptable quality without changes in the manuscript. If you have checked “Marginal” or “Poor,” give objective reason for your evaluation in the “Remarks” section, on the next page. If you have checked boxes “Acceptable” or “Good,” please give a constructive evaluation of the paper in the “Remarks” section. If you checked “Prize Paper Quality,” the editor would be grateful for your reasons.

––––– RECOMMENDATION FOR PUBLICATION –––––

Publish unaltered in the Transactions on CPMT. / Submit to Proceedings of the IEEE
Holm Conference.
Publish in the Transactions on CPMT after making
changes recommended in the “Remarks” section. / Submit to other Transaction of the
IEEE Group/Society on:
Reject! Please summarize reasons
in the “Remarks” section. / Submit to some other named journals:

Return review to:

Name:

Address:Phone No.:

Reviewer’s Signature:Date:
(initial if sent by e-mail)

1) Recommendation of this paper for publication in IEEE Transactions CPMT is also a recommendation for publication in the HOLM CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS.
2) Some papers of good quality have characteristics which make them unacceptable for the TRANSACTIONS, but can be very successful conference papers, e.g. progress report of incomplete work, speculative new concepts, etc.
If you rejected the paper for IEEE TRANS. CPMT, do you recommend that it be published in HOLM CONFERENCE?
A. / YES! Unaltered / B. / YES! After making recommended changes / C. / No! Please summarize reasons

REMARKS

Note:Sometimes it is convenient for the reviewer to place comments and changes directly on the authors’ manuscript. If you have done so, please check this box / 

Please separate your remarks in clearly identified sections:

Remarks that are not clearly identified will be assumed to fall into the first category. Please use as many additional pages as necessary.

Typical items you can consider are: Does the author present the significance of the work? Are the references adequate? Is the paper technically sound? Is there material that can be omitted? Are there errors in language? etc.)

 For author (AND send paper with corrections, if applicable) 

Minimum changes required for publication in the IEEE TRANSACTIONS CPMT: