Showcase Project Judges Rubric

District Project Scoring Rubric

Project Title:______

Teacher’s Name: ______

Student Representative: ______

150 Points Possible / Novice / Apprentice / Proficient / Distinguished / Points Possible / Points Awarded
STLP Knowledge / Team members have little knowledge of STLP goals & mission. (0-1) / Some team members demonstrate some understanding of STLP Goals & Mission (2-3) / Most team members demonstrate some understanding of STLP Goals & Mission (3-4) / All team members demonstrate understanding of STLP Goals & Mission. (5) / 5
Team members have little understanding of connection of STLP goals and project. (0-1) / Some team members demonstrate understanding of connection of STLP goals and project. (2-3) / Most team members demonstrate understanding of connection of STLP goals and project. (3-4) / All team members demonstrate understanding of connection of STLP goals and project. (5) / 5
Activities are tied to curriculum / Little evidence of connection between technology and target curriculum
Students cannot explain connection. (0-3) / Some evidence of connection between technology and target curriculum;
Students cannot clearly explain connection (4-7) / Adequate connection between technology and target curriculum;
Students can explain connection.
(8-12) / Clear strong evidence of connection between technology and target curriculum;
Students can explain the connection clearly and precisely. (13-15) / 15
Project Materials / Appearance, quality of product, props/visuals is not evident (0-1) / Some appearance, quality of product, and props/visuals are present. (2-4) / Appearance, quality of product, props/visuals are adequate and help the project. (5-7) / Appearance, quality of product, props/visuals draws audience to booth.
(8-10) / 10
Copyright Rules / No attempt is made to credit materials not original (0-4) / Students attempt
To credit some materials not original. (5-10) / Most of the materials are credited correctly, some may be unclear.
(10-15) / All copyright rules are followed. Students credit all material not original.
(15-20) / 20
Novice / Apprentice / Proficient / Distinguished / Points Possible / Points Awarded
Presentation Skills / Only a few of the students seemed involved in the project. (0-1) / Some team members appear involved and interested in the project. (2-4) / Most team members are involved and organized in presenting information.
(5-7) / All team members demonstrate understanding of project, good organization skills in presenting information. (8-10) / 10
Creativity / Team members used little creativity in preparing their presentation or project. (0-5) / Quality of presentation/props
Visuals shows some evidence of originality. (6-12) / Quality of presentation/props
Visuals shows some evidence of originality and inventiveness.. (13-20) / Quality of presentation/props
Visuals showsignificant evidence of originality and inventiveness.
Audience is wowed!. (20-25) / 25
Self Reflection / No evidence of self reflection by students or group. (0-1) / Students were given self reflection sheets and they were returned (2-4) / Students were given self reflection sheets and the were returned with some reflective comments. (5-7) / Students team work and self reflection is strong and evident.
(8-10) / 10
Brief Interview / Students have little understanding of the impact the project had on the school or community.
(0-5) / Students lack full understanding of the impact the project had on the school and or community. But think that it may.
(6-15) / Students somewhat demonstrate an understanding of the impact the project had on the school and or community.
(16-25) / Students clearly demonstrate an understanding of the impact the project had on school and or community.
(26-50) / 50
Total / 150

Judge’s comments:

Judge’s signature ______