The Standard Club
The Standard Club
Ship Condition Survey
Tanker
Insert ship picture here
Ship Name:Survey Type:
Survey Port:
Date:
Survey Company:
Surveyor:
Table of Contents
Section 1.0 General Information
1.1 - General Particulars
1.2 - Machinery Particulars
Section 2.0 - Risk Profile and Ship Rating
2.1 - Risk profile
2.2 - Ship rating
Section 3.0 - Notes and Comments
3.1 - Ship description & History
3.2 - ISM
3.3 - Maintenance
3.4 - Class
3.5 - Hull Integrity
3.6 - Lifting and deck equipment
3.7 - Machinery spaces
3.8 - Ballast system
3.9 - Marpol & environment
3.10 - Navigation
3.11 - Safety
3.12 - Manning
3.13 - Security
3.14 - Cargo section
3.15 - Summary
3.16 - Defects & Observations
Section 4.0 – ISM
4.1 - Important dates
4.2 - Procedures, review and audit
4.3 - Surveyors comments on ISM
Section 5.0 - Maintenance & Class
5.1 - Maintenance
5.2 - Class
5.3 - Surveyors comments on Maintenace & Class
Section 6.0 - Hull Integrity
6.1 - General
6.2 - Corrosion control
6.3 - Surveyors comments on Hull Integrity
Section 7.0 - Lifting & Deck Equipment
7.1 - Fixed Lifting equipment
7.2 - Loose Lifting equipment
7.3 - Deck equipment
7.4 - Surveyors comments on Lifting & Deck Equipment
Section 8.0 - Machinery
8.1 - Machinery Running hours
8.2 - Machinery spaces general
8.3 - Machinery Maintenance
8.4 - Alarm, monitoring and shutdown systems
8.5 - Main Engines
8.6 - Diesel Generators
8.7 - Boilers
8.8 - Surveyors comments on Machinery
Section 9.0 - Ballast System
9.1 – Ballast Tanks and System
9.2 - Class & Crew Tank Inspections
9.3 - Surveyors comments on Ballast Systems
Section 10.0 - Marpol
10.1 - Oil waste management & control
10.2 - Bunkering & fuel management
10.3 - Sewage & Garbage
10.4 - Surveyors comments on Marpol
Section 11.0 - Navigation
11.1 - Navigation equipment
11.2 - Navigation procedures
11.3 - Surveyors comments on Navigation
Section 12.0 - Safety
12.1 - Safety Equipment
12.2 - Life-saving appliances
12.3 - Fire-fighting
12.4 - Fixed fire fighting equipment
12.5 - Surveyors comments on Safety
Section 13.0 - Manning
13.1 - General
13.2 - Crew experience
13.3 - Surveyors comments on Manning
Section 14.0 - Security
14.1 - General
14.2 - Surveyors comments on ISPS
Section 15 - Tanker
15.1 - Cargo spaces
15.2 - Cargo operations
15.3 - Cargo and Ballast Handling and Monitoring Equipment
15.4 - Inert gas (IG)
15.5 - Pump room
15.6 - Crude oil washing (COW)
15.7 - Surveyors comments on Tanker
Section 16 - Photographs
Section 1.0 General Information
1.1 - General ParticularsShip name
IMO number
Flag
Ship type
Owners
Technical managers
Date of last change of owner or technical manager
Current Classification Society
Previous Classification society
Class Condition Assessment Rating ( CAP ) / Hull:- Machinery:-
Year built
Place built
GRT (t)
DWT (t)
LBP (m)
Recent cargoes carried
Recent ports of call
Trading pattern
1.2 - Machinery Particulars
Main engine(s) / Make: / Type: slow/medium/high / No:
Main engines kW rating
Diesel Generators / Make: / Type: / No:
Diesel Generators kW rating
Boilers / Make: / Type: / No:
Thrusters / Make: / Type: / No:
Steering Gear / Make:
Oil Purifiers / Make:
Propeller - Fixed / CPP
Reduction gear / Make:
Stabilizers (if fitted) / Make: / Type:
Cargo pumps (if Fitted) / Make: / Type: / No:
Cargo cranes / Make: / Type: / No:
Section 2.0 - Risk Profile and Ship Rating
2.1 - Risk Profile
Low / Medium / HighHull failure
Ballast / Cargo tank failure
Piping failure
Machinery failure
Lifting equipment failure
Cargo damage (Dry cargo) / N.A.
Cargo damage / off spec liquids (Tankers)
Passenger injury (Pax/RoRo)
Accidental pollution
Injury because of unsafe working practices
Injury because of unsafe equipment / environment
ISM deficiencies
Fire
Nautical errors
Potential competence issues
2.2 - Ship Rating
Poor / Acceptable / Good / Very goodGeneral housekeeping deck
General housekeeping accommodation
General housekeeping ER
General seamanship
General watchkeeping
Engineering competence
Give a brief reason for any ratings in the risk profile not being classed as low:
Section 3.0 - Notes and Comments
3.1 - Ship description & History
3.2 - ISM
3.3 – Maintenance
3.4 - Class
3.5 - Hull Integrity
3.6 - Lifting and Deck Equipment
3.7 - Machinery Spaces
3.8 - Ballast System
3.9 - Marpol & Environment
3.10 - Navigation
3.11 - Safety
3.12 - Manning
3.13 - Security
3.14 - Cargo Section
3.15 - Summary
3.16 - Defects & Observations
Section 4.0 – ISM
4.1 - Important dates
Date / RemarksLast superintendent's visit?
Last PSC visit?
Last external ISM audit + by whom?
Last internal ISM audit?
SMC Issued?
DOC Issued?
Last emergency drill + frequency?
Last safety meeting + frequency?
Last risk assessment?
Last permit to work?
Last accident report?
Last near miss report?
Last incident report?
Last ISM revision?
4.2 - Procedures, Review and Audit
Yes / No / RemarksDid the Master and C/E receive an office briefing prior to joining this ship? / ☐ / ☐ /
Did the Master and C/E receive an adequate handover on joining this ship? / ☐ / ☐ /
Do the Master and C/E regularly discuss operational matters with the office? / ☐ / ☐ /
Do the Master and C/E issue written standing orders? / ☐ / ☐ /
Do the Master and C/E issue written night orders? / ☐ / ☐ /
Is there a written procedure for safety induction / ship familiarisation of new joiners? / ☐ / ☐ /
Is the SMS written in a language understood by all of the crew? Which language? / ☐ / ☐ /
Did the superintendent leave a written job list after his last visit? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are actions completed and formally closed-out? / ☐ / ☐ /
Were there any significant non-conformities raised during the last external ISM audit? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are the non-conformities completed and formally closed-out? / ☐ / ☐ /
What recommendations were left with the Master after the last internal ISM audit?
Are all recommendations completed and formally closed-out? / ☐ / ☐ /
Does the Master carry out an effective ISM review and at what frequency? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are risk assessments detailed, effective and do they cover all hazardous tasks? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are ship specific risk assessments (drafted on-board) detailed and effective? / ☐ / ☐ /
Does the ship operate a permit to work (PTW) system, that covers all hazardous tasks? / ☐ / ☐ /
Is the PTW system linked to the risk assessment process and or standard operating procedures? / ☐ / ☐ /
Does the PTW system include an effective isolation (Lock Out / Tag Out) process? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are safety meetings minutes recorded, sent to the managers ashore and are they acknowledged? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are safety meeting minutes circulated on-board / pinned up on a notice board? / ☐ / ☐ /
Does the ship have an effective system for reporting and recording accident / near miss / defects? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are debriefs carried out following an emergency drill? / ☐ / ☐ /
Do contingency drills involve coordination with the managers ashore? / ☐ / ☐ /
Does the contingency plan detail office contacts and emergency services? / ☐ / ☐ /
4.3 - Surveyors comments on ISM
Section 5.0 - Maintenance & Class
5.1 - Maintenance
/ Yes / No / RemarksIs there a structured planned maintenance system (PMS) for deck / engine department? / ☐ / ☐ /
Is the PMS Class approved? / ☐ / ☐ /
Does the system incorporate a spare parts inventory / ordering facility? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are PMS records submitted to office? How often? / ☐ / ☐ /
Can a list of overdue maintenance be provided? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are ballast tanks and hatch covers (if fitted) included in the PMS? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are deck cranes, winches, davits lifting appliances included in PMS? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are critical spare part levels monitored? / ☐ / ☐ /
Do relevant officers appear familiar with the PMS? / ☐ / ☐ /
Is the maintenance of an apparent satisfactory standard? / ☐ / ☐ /
Is engine critical equipment maintenance conducted by the crew? If not whom? / ☐ / ☐ /
Is there a policy for spare part supply (ie direct from manufacturers) / ☐ / ☐ /
5.2 - Class
Yes / No / RemarksAre all statutory certificates, including annual surveys up to date? / ☐ / ☐ /
What conditions of Class are imposed?
Date of last special survey?
Date of last docking / in-water survey?
Has the ship been detained by PSC in the last 2 years / ☐ / ☐ /
Were there any significant findings / deficiencies noted in the last 3 PSC inspections? / ☐ / ☐ /
Has the ship been laid-up in the last 3 yrs? / ☐ / ☐ /
5.3 - Surveyors comments on Maintenace & Class
Section 6.0 - Hull Integrity
6.1 – General
Yes / No / RemarksWhat is the condition of the shell plating?
Are hull markings clearly marked and legible? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are there any sharp indents or buckling on the shell? / ☐ / ☐ /
Advise % area of hull not covered by paint?
Advise average depth and frequency of pitting for the shell.
What is the condition of the deck plating?
Advise % area of deck not covered by paint?
Advise average depth and frequency of pitting for the deck.
Is there evidence of steel renewal / temporary repairs (doubler plate)? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are guardrails, walkways, ladders and any other means provided for the protection of the crew and others in apparent good order? / ☐ / ☐ /
Is the general condition of deck pipework free from significant corrosion, pitting, soft patches or other temporary repairs? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are pipe and hatch penetrations corroded at the main deck connection? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are vent headers, air pipes & sounding pipes in apparent good order and are they marked to indicate the spaces they serve? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are hydraulic pipes free from corrosion and / or leakage (incl. hydraulic rams)? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are all access doors, vents, vent covers & other deck openings, in apparent good condition and capable of being properly secured? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are all cable transits and bulkhead penetrations in apparent good order? / ☐ / ☐ /
6.2 - Corrosion Control
Briefly outline the corrosion control policy in the following areas:Hull
Cargo spaces
Ballast tanks
6.3 - Surveyors comments on Hull Integrity
Section 7.0 - Lifting & Deck Equipment
7.1 - Fixed Lifting Equipment
Yes / No / RemarksCargo cranes: state number, type and SWL of deck cranes / derricks fitted on board.
Are cargo cranes well maintained, inspected, tested & with valid certification? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are crane wires and sheaves well maintained and in apparent good order? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are crane slew bearings, in apparent good order and is a procedure in place to check wear? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are crane cabs in apparent good order with well maintained controls, signage, emergency stops, safety equipment / FFE & a dedicated means of escape? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are all ER & stores cranes well maintained, inspected, tested & with valid certification? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are personnel elevators and / or escalators in apparent good condition, with valid certification? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are pad eyes, beams and other fixed securing points in apparent good order and marked with SWL? / ☐ / ☐ /
Is the above equipment maintained as part of the ship's PMS? / ☐ / ☐ /
7.2 - Loose Lifting Equipment
Yes / No / RemarksIs there an effective inspection and maintenance programme for loose lifting equipment such as chain blocks, wires, strops, slings, shackles, eyebolts etc? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are test certificates available onboard for all items of loose lifting equipment including all the above equipment? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are all items of loose lifting gear marked with a unique identification & colour code system? / ☐ / ☐ /
Is there an adequate storage system in place for loose lifting equipment? / ☐ / ☐ /
Is there a system for the quarantine of damaged or uncertified lifting equipment? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are all items of loose lifting equipment maintained as part of the ship's PMS? / ☐ / ☐ /
Is there a procedure requiring that all lifting operations are properly planned? / ☐ / ☐ /
7.3 - Deck Equipment
Yes / No / RemarksIs the gangway motor, wires, safety net & general structure in apparent good order and is it rigged correctly? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are windlass, mooring winches and other associated equipment in apparent good order? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are adequate mooring practices followed? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are mooring ropes / wires in good condition? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are the mooring areas non-slip? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are snap-back zones marked? / ☐ / ☐ /
Is the anchor cable and anchor securing arrangements in apparent good condition? / ☐ / ☐ /
7.4 - Surveyors comments on Lifting & Deck Equipment
Section 8.0 - Machinery
8.1- Machinery Running Hours1 / 2 / 3 / 4
Main Engine(s)
Auxiliary Engines
8.2- Machinery Spaces General
Yes / No / Remarks
Is there evidence of abnormal running / breakdown in the ER log book? / ☐ / ☐ /
Do ER spare part stores appear well stocked and in apparent good order? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are there any generators, purifiers or compressors out of service? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are piping systems in apparent good condition and well maintained? / ☐ / ☐ /
Is pipework free from temporary repairs? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are ship side connections in apparent satisfactory condition? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are oil spray protection arrangements fitted on fuel and lube oil pipes? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are any temporary save-alls in use to contain leaks? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are all oil mist detectors operational and working correctly? / ☐ / ☐ /
Is the switchboard and earth monitoring in apparent good order? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are switchboard insulation mats in place and in apparent good order? / ☐ / ☐ /
If applicable, are high voltage enclosures protected from unauthorised access? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are ER lighting levels adequate? / ☐ / ☐ /
Is the ER properly ventilated? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are bilges clean and dry? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are bilge alarms operational? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are watertight doors closed at sea, during manoeuvring & UMS? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are ER floor plates secured? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are any level gauge self-closing devices 'gagged' open? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are any sounding pipe deadweight closing devices tied-back? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are there any exposed and un-lagged exhaust manifolds / piping? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are workshops well stocked and in apparent good order? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are goggles and tool supports provided at drilling, cutting and grinding machines? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are permanent eye shields fitted on grinding machines? / ☐ / ☐ /
Purifier room (if fitted) cleanliness
Fuel Quick Closing valves last test date
Seawater inlets & discharge valves. Valves to be free to operate, No spool pieces allowed directly on sea chest. / ☐ / ☐ /
Stern Seal, date last renewed, one piece or bonded? / ☐ / ☐ /
Stern Seal Wear down, last readings & date taken. / ☐ / ☐ /
Spares required by Classification Society. Date last checked? / ☐ / ☐ /
Confirmed by master / chief engineer spares referred to above on board / ☐ / ☐ /
Pipe systems labelled or colour coded, valves with tallies? / ☐ / ☐ /
In respect to any of the above machinery spaces, do significant fire hazards exist?
General condition of machinery spaces
Standard of general ER housekeeping is
8.3 – Machinery Maintenance
Is the planned maintenance PC software based? / ☐ / ☐ /
Is defect reporting linked to the PMS? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are there any defects outstanding? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are manufactures maintenance schedules followed? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are manufactures spares used? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are manufactures manuals onboard? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are manufactures supervisors used during major overhaul of main machinery? / ☐ / ☐ /
Is fuel oil analysis carried out at bunkering? / ☐ / ☐ /
Was the last set of L.O analysis results acceptable? / ☐ / ☐ /
Is engine performance monitored apart from the machinery log book? (peak pressures, etc) / ☐ / ☐ /
Are main switchboard thermal imaging surveys carried out? / ☐ / ☐ /
Is machinery vibration monitoring carried out? / ☐ / ☐ /
8.4 – Alarm, Monitoring and Shutdown Systems
Does the ship operate UMS? / ☐ / ☐ /Bilge alarms, confirm all functional and date last tested. / ☐ / ☐ /
Is the engineer's alarm operational? / ☐ / ☐ /
ME / DG fuel pipe leakage alarm tested operational. / ☐ / ☐ /
ME / DG over speed trips, date last tested. / ☐ / ☐ /
Overload trips, date breakers last tested. / ☐ / ☐ /
Reverse power trips, date last tested. / ☐ / ☐ /
Purifier loss of seal alarms fitted & working? / ☐ / ☐ /
Purifier room bilge alarms fitted & tested operational? / ☐ / ☐ /
Is alarm system testing part of the PMS? / ☐ / ☐ /
Is alarm testing equipment on board? / ☐ / ☐ /
8.5 – Main Engines
What is the general appearance of the main engines with regard to oil and water leaks, exhaust lagging condition
Is there any ME maintenance overdue? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are hot box and exhaust covers in place and in good condition? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are main bearing temperatures monitored? / ☐ / ☐ /
Frequency of OMD testing , date of last test.
Frequency of ME shut down testing, date of last test.
8.6 – Diesel Generators
What is the general appearance of the DGs with regard to oil and water leaks, exhaust lagging condition
Is there any DG maintenance overdue? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are hot box and exhaust covers in place and in good condition? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are generator bearing temperatures monitored? / ☐ / ☐ /
Hours since last major overhaul of all generators? / ☐ / ☐ /
Time since connecting rod bolts changed
All generators full load test.
If generators are unable to carry full load, state designed full load - give load attained.
Date last blackout test carried out?
Frequency of emergency generator testing?
Date of last test.
8.7 - Boilers
Boiler(s), general appearance and condition, especially lagging, inspection doors valves, valves, etcAre boiler water testing records acceptable? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are boiler water testing results reviewed by chemical treatment supplier? / ☐ / ☐ /
Is the boiler hot well tank free from oil contamination? / ☐ / ☐ /
Is the boiler burner save-all clean, free of oil & without leaks? / ☐ / ☐ /
Frequency of EGB inspection?
Date of last cleaning.
8.8 - Surveyors comments on Machinery
Section 9.0 - Ballast System
9.1 – Ballast Tanks and System
Describe the ballast system configuration:Carry out an inspection of ballast tanks and report on their condition. Is there evidence of wastage, cracking or buckling? Two tanks for a routine survey and four tanks for an entry survey.
Tank No.
Anodes wastage (%)
Cleanliness
Coating condition
Steelwork condition
Pitting (% and depth)
Connecting trunks
Pipe(s) condition
Distortion
Oil contamination
Structure detached
Valves and spindles
Doublers
Access condition
Overall condition
9.2 - Class & Crew Tank Inspections
/ Yes / No / RemarksAre the ballast tanks inspections required at annual survey? / ☐ / ☐ /
Do Class records indicate that ballast tanks have significant corrosion? / ☐ / ☐ /
Does the crew conduct ballast tank inspections and if so at what frequency? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are condition reports maintained onboard and sent to the office? / ☐ / ☐ /
9.3 - Surveyors comments on Ballast Systems
Section 10.0 - Marpol
10.1 - Oil Waste Management & Control
List the equipment fitted for compliance with Marpol for the discharge of oil waste from the engine room:Yes / No / Remarks
Examine the Oil Record Book, is it completed correctly and up to date? / ☐ / ☐ /
Is the Oily Water Separator (OWS) in full working order and tested? / ☐ / ☐ /
Is the OWS overboard valve marked and locked in the closed position? / ☐ / ☐ /
Last calibration conducted on the OWS oil content alarm? Certificate available? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are 'discharge of oil prohibited' notices prominently displayed? / ☐ / ☐ /
Is there a small bore sampling point on the discharge line? What diameter is it? / ☐ / ☐ /
Does the ship have an operational incinerator and is it used for burning oil waste? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are any other systems available for dealing with oil waste? / ☐ / ☐ /
10.2 - Bunkering & Fuel Management
Yes / No / RemarksHas the C/E issued a formal bunkering policy? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are bunker checklists, relevant, thorough and correctly completed? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are bunker stations in apparent good order including: pipework, blanks, valves, save-alls and are pipes clearly labelled? / ☐ / ☐ /
Is bunker fuel oil analysis carried out? / ☐ / ☐ /
Does the ship provide training in oil spill response? / ☐ / ☐ /
Is the SOPEP locker stocked with sufficient equipment to deal with an incident? / ☐ / ☐ /
Is the ship using low sulphur fuel in accordance with SECA requirements (Marpol VI)? / ☐ / ☐ /
Are procedures followed to prevent air pollution by funnel smoke? / ☐ / ☐ /
Does the ship have a Class approved energy efficency manual (SEEMP)? / ☐ / ☐ /
10.3 - Sewage & Garbage