UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE AUGUST 2014

EXAMPLE SPECIFICATION TEMPLATE

***********************************INSTRUCTIONS***********************************

This example specification template is intended to aid the purchaser in communicating requirements to contractors in support of potential acquisition decisions. Thespecification applies toactive roadway vehicle barriers (referred to afterwards as the “barrier system”), which includes power-assisted or manualoperated active vehicle barriers.

The example specifications template is not exhaustive and should not be employed “as is.” The purchaser should adapt the specification template to suit organizational context (e.g., procedural and policy constraints or requirements), threat assessments, operational requirements, and site-specific context. The template uses an outline format and bracketed [] text to help the purchaser tailor the template.Bracketed [] text indicate items that should be defined by the purchaser. Notes (*) indicate information provided to the purchaser to help in understand the content and layout of the template. The purchaser can develop their own specifications template by:

  • First, conducting planning activities and research to better understand relevant context and possible implications of specification decisions. The example specification is intended to be used in concert with the Guide to Active Vehicle Barrier (AVB) Specification and Selection Resources, which highlights available resource and activities to conduct prior to and alongside specification.
  • Second, identifyingadditional examples of specifications from projects or organizations with relevant context. Such specifications will provide useful comparisons to this template to highlight areas that should be considered further before adopting.Uniqueorganizational or project context might lead you to adopt requirementsvery different from the examples identified in this template.
  • Third, modifying the scope of the specification content included in the example template by deleting or adding numbered levels. Adhere to organizational standards when editing the example specification template. Is each numbered and lettered section adding a requirement that the organization deems desirable and appropriate? If not, then delete that section or replace it with the appropriate substitute language.
  • Fourth, modifying the content of the specification text, by filling in the bracketed language. A first pass should identify and remove bracketed specifications, typically“SELECT” items, not appropriate or desirable to include as a requirement. The remaining bracketed content should then be defined or removed, and typically on a case-by-case basis for each project.

For bracketed text that says INSERT, the appropriate measure depends on the project context. Thepurchaser should determine the appropriate measure for each project and replace the INSERT bracketed text with that value for each project. For bracketed text that says SELECT, the measure is not always included or is typically one of only a few values. Determine whether to include the sentence as a specification consideration, and if the consideration is desirable, select fromone or more of theexamplesprovided (or an appropriate substitute). The final version of this document to be used for dissemination to the contractor(s) should be edited by the purchaser per their project specific requirements and have no remaining Bracketed [] text or *Notes.

********************OMIT THIS PAGE IN COMPLETED TEMPLATE***********************

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT:

Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

COPYRIGHT:

The information contained herein is a reproduction; additional copyright rules may apply. The U.S. Government retains Unlimited Rights.Unlimited rights means right to use, modify, perform, display, release, or disclose technical data in whole or in part, in any manner and for any purpose whatsoever, and to have or authorize others to do so.This material may be reproduced by or for the U.S. Government pursuant to the copyright license under clause at DFARS 252.227-7013 (November 1995).

********************OMIT THIS PAGE IN COMPLETED TEMPLATE***********************

BARRIER SYSTEMS

GENERAL

  1. The purpose of this document is to communicate the purchaser’s requirements for active roadway barrier system (referred to as the “barrier system”) to contractors in support of potential acquisition decisions. The barrier system includes but is not necessarily limited to, power-assisted or manually deployed active vehicle barriers located in and around the entrances/exits access at control point locations.
  2. Specifications are comprised of the following sections and subsections:

I.PERFORMANCE

1.PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

2.FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATIONS

3.PURCHASER SUBMITTALS TO MANUFACTURER

4.MANUFACTURER SUBMITTALS TO PURCHASER

II.PRODUCTS

2.1.MATERIALS, GENERAL

3.FABRICATION

4.ACCESSORIES

III.EXECUTION

6.EXAMINATION, COORDINATION, PREPARATION

7.QUALITY ASSURANCE

8.DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING

9.INSTALLATION

10.TESTING AND ADJUSTING

11.WARRANTY

12.SPARE PARTS

13.TRAINING

  1. Terms of Reference. The following parties referenced herein are comprised as follows:

1.Purchaser.The entity requesting from the Contractor(s) acquisition of a barrier system and services as described herein; the client or customer.

2.Contractor. The entity providing services to the purchaser, which includes the manufacturer, installer, or a third party provider.

3.Installer. The contractor providing installation services to the purchaser.

4.Manufacturer. The contractor providing manufacturing or fabrication services to the purchaser.

5.Operator. Staff in the field who operate the installed barrier system.

6.Other terms (e.g. RSO, contracting officer), will be as identified by the purchaser.

  1. References. [The current list reflects references included in the original template. Updateto match any template modifications]

1.UNIFIED FACILITIES GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS (UFGS)

  1. DIVISION 01 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
  2. DIVISION 03 CONCRETE
  3. DIVISION 28 ELECTRONIC SAFETY AND SECURITY
  4. DIVISION 31 EARTHWORK
  5. DIVISION 32 EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS
  6. DIVISION 34 TRANSPORTATION

2.AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS (AASHTO)

  1. AASHTO HB-17 (2002; Errata 2003; Errata 2005) Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges

3.AMERICAN WELDING SOCIETY (AWS)

  1. Shear Studs: AWS D1.1
  2. AWS D1.1/D1.1M (2010) Structural Welding Code – Steel
  3. Welding Electrodes: AWS A5.1 or A5.5 E-7-XX

4.ASTM INTERNATIONAL (ASTM)

  1. ASTM F 2656 (2007) Standard Test Method for Vehicle Crash Testing of Perimeter Barriers
  2. Steel Pipes: ASTM A53
  3. Shear Studs: ASTM A108
  4. Cement: ASTM C150 Type I
  5. Aggregates: ASTM C33

5.U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE (DOS)

  1. SD-STD-02.01 (2003; Rev A) Specification For Vehicle Crash Test of Perimeter Barriers and Gates

6.U.S. NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION (NARA)

  1. 29 CFR 1910 Occupational Safety and Health Standards

7.UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES (UL)

  1. UL 486A-486B (2003; Rev thru Apr 2009) Standard for Wire Connectors

8.Concrete: ACI building code 318-99

  1. PERFORMANCE

*Note: The Performance Requirements section contains specifications related to the expected goals and outcomes of the barrier system (i.e.the barrier unit and necessary accessories) employed. Functional Specifications contains specifications related to the operation of the barrier system when in the intended operational environment.The Submittals subsections describe expectations for information sharing to support identification of additional design details or services necessary to ensure performance.

  1. PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS
  2. Manufacturers shall provide barrier systems that comply with [INSERT applicable purchaser’s federal, state, and/or local government and purchaser’s organizational regulations].
  3. Manufacturers that intend to providebarrier systemsshall havedemonstrated successful experience in relevant contexts. Acceptable forms of demonstration include prior production of units with similar security attack resistance, dimensions, and resistance ratings, [produced within the last INSERT minimum number, e.g. 5 years] [and/or with at least INSERTminimum number of total installed units, e.g. 25].
  4. Stopping Capacity.Manufacturers will provide certifications toevidence that the barrier design has been tested by an approved, independent testing agency.A test result that meets or exceeds one or more of the followingresults is required:

1.Crash testedin accordance with the following test methods:

  1. [INSERT test method name(s), e.g. ASTM F 2656]

2.[INSERTtest vehicle weight, impact velocity(s)]

3.[INSERTvehicle penetration or allowable range]

4.[INSERTdispersion of major debris or allowable range]

5.[SELECT Additional stopping capacityconsiderations include that barrier]:

  1. [SELECT Must present a visible obstacle capable of [SELECT stopping; immobilizing; destroying[INSERT list of components] in] vehicles with a weight and velocity characteristics as defined above.]
  2. [SELECT Must be able to prevent a follow-on vehicle from passing post-impact.]
  3. [SELECT Must be designed or crash rated to stop a vehicle approaching from [SELECT a single direction at minimum; either direction].]
  4. [SELECT Must be demonstrated to [SELECT stop; allow] pedestrian access.]
  5. [SELECT Mustprotect against[INSERT additional threats, e.g. VBIED, ballistics].]
  6. [SELECT Provide documentation forbarrier survivability, e.g., an assessment of barrier condition following a documented crash test.It should include an estimate of damages (including to foundation), repair time, and level of effort to restore barrier to normal operations.]
  1. Barrier blocking dimensions must be provided ‘as certified/approved.’ [SELECT Alternatively, if a barrier system's dimensions are between the dimensions of two crash tested barrier systems that are otherwise identical, then that barrier system is also acceptable, pending review [INSERT by anacceptable approval entity, e.g. qualified engineer].
  1. Physical Constraints.The manufacturer must demonstrate within site drawings that the installed barrier systemis capable of (1) operating within the allowable site dimensions, and of (2) allowing or obstructing all expected vehicle types, including vehicles following alongside or behind another vehicle.The barrier system maymeet requirements by changing dimensions throughtemporary removal or reconfiguration, provided that the expected change(s) in configuration can be performed within [INSERT minimum operator time in hours] and does not require tools, equipment, or knowledge that aren’t readily available to the operator.

1.Width. Provide a barrier or set of barriers capable, in width of operation, of obstructing vehicular traffic in a [INSERT width of access to control] meter wide traffic lane. The installed barrier system must be demonstrated within site drawings as capable of operating within the allowable site dimensions, less than [INSERT maximum site dimensions] when in both open/closed positions, including swinging/sliding elements.

2.Height. To ensure barrier fits allowable site overhead, all barrier elements must be less than [INSERT maximum overhead] when in both the open and closed positions. Asdetermined by engineer to prevent expected high-frame and low-frame vehicles from passage,height when in the closed position shall be no less than [INSERT height] mm above the roadway,as measured from the top of the roadway to the top of the vehicle arresting element, and extend to at least [INSERT height] mm above the roadway surface, as measured from the bottom of the vehicle arresting element to the top of the roadway.

3.Allowable Protrusions. To allow passage of vehicle with low undercarriage, the barrier elements in the open position and within the vehicle clearance areashall extend no more than [INSERT minimum expected undercarriage height, e.g. 16 mm] above the roadway surface or be flush to the roadway. The barrier shall be equipped with on and off ramps or other measures for smooth transition between surfaces when the barrier extends more than the recommended height above the roadway when in the open position.

4.Allowable gaps. The installed barriers must be demonstrated within site drawings as capable of allowing gaps of no more than [INSERT minimum expected threat width or crash-tested gap, whichever is less] mm. If pedestrian access is necessary,gaps should allow no less than [INSERT allowable gap for pedestrian access and/or ADA requirements, e.g. 3 feet].For gates, the maximum clear opening between the gate frame and end posts, between the bottom of the gate and finished grade, and between any grill work shall be 75 mm 3 inches.

5.Axel load. If barrier design requires that barrier components support weight, barriers shall be capable of remaining in operation without immediate repair following support of the maximum expected load, [maximum expected vehicle weight, e.g. for U.S. highways typically 80 kN (18,000 pounds) axle load or equivalent wheel load] and also if expected due to operation procedures, amaximum tandem axle load of [e.g. maximum expected load of 142 kN (32,000 pounds) for U.S. Highways]. Design for this load shall be in accordance with AASHTO HB-17.

6.Foundation. The barrier system shall require no more than [INSERT maximum allowable foundation depth][1] to accommodate its foundation.

  1. Normal Operating Speed. The barrier system of the installed widths or lengths shall be capable of being opened within [INSERT time to accommodate maximum traffic flow, e.g. 5-13seconds] and closed within [INSERT time e.g. 3-10seconds] during normal operation.
  2. Emergency Operating Speed. If requested, the barrier shall be additionally capable of being lowered within [time to close against threat at distance of detection, given operator response time, e.g. 1.5-3] seconds from activation in emergency operations. Manufacturer should inform the purchaser of the estimated number of emergency fast operationactivations that impactthe barrier level of maintenance estimated from normal operations. The barrier system shall include all necessary control and logic devices, lines and valves to override and lock out the normal speed control for emergence fast operation of the barrier.
  3. Normal Operations. Design operator for the maximum expected cycle applications, intended access, and operating modes. Barrier system shall allow intended operation modes.

1.The barrier system shall be capable of operating a minimum of [number to accommodate maximum peak traffic, e.g. 200] complete up/down cycles per hour, for at least [duration of peak traffic expected] hours per day.Else, if operating mode is not cycled for each vehicle, the system shall be designed to maintain the default position, without inspection or activation, for period of time of up to [e.g. 1] week and remain functional.

2.The barrier system must be compatible with the available power sources identified to the manufacturer, and the electrical supply standard shall be [e.g. 208VAC 1 phase 60 Hz]. Other power sources utilized by the barrier may be specified and agreed upon if justified by site drawings and barrier system design. Power backup systems shall be [e.g. 24 to 100 volt] or less systems.

3.Barriers indicated as portable or transportable shall be capable of manual and/or backup power operation independent of a locally available power source.

4.[Insert if required] Speed must be easily adjustable by [the end user without the need of special tools, computers or software, by manufacturer, and/or by manufacturer approved third party]. Manufacturer shall inform the purchaser of the user adjustments expected to impact barrier performance or level of maintenance.

5.[Insert if required] The retractable barrier motion shall be instantly stopped within [1-3] seconds and reversible.

  1. Reliability.Barrier systems shall be capable of operating given normal operations specifications provided above with the level of maintenance outlined in the manufacturer maintenance manual, unless otherwise indicated by the manufacturer in the Manufacturer Submittals. The barrier system must provide maximum dependability and ease of maintenance.

1.The barrier shall perform without failure of any component necessary for continued operation of barrier for [e.g. 200,000] continuous cycles.

2.The motors(s)/operator(s) shall be capable of actuating the installed barrier system. Manufacturer shall verify that the motors(s)/operator(s) are suitable for operating the installed dimensions and weight, and are sufficiently sized for the expected speed and frequency of operations.

3.For heavy traffic, if applicable, the barrier should be demonstrated as capable of [30%-100%] duty cycle or continuous open/close cycles without failure due to overheating.

4.If available, manufacturer shall provide a description of tested or field conditions used to verify cycle performance, including presence of weather, traffic, and levels of performed maintenance. Cycle testing must be performed in a configuration where the active barrier itself is located in an outdoor location that will expose the unit to full sunlight and the effects of climatic conditions at the test facility (pollution, rain, snow, sleet etc).

5.The system must be designed to function consistently in the intended locations to which this specification document applies. If available, manufacturers should provide demonstrated success of installed barriers in similar site conditions, including duration and level of maintenance.

  1. Serviceability.Barrier shall minimize the level of effort to maintain the barrier.

1.Barrier and accessories shall allow local technician [SELECT trained by manufacturer; approved by manufacturer] to perform routine and annual maintenance tasks without the assistance of heavy equipment or specialized tools not readily available.

2.Panels and sealing features mounted on the barrier shall be included and made accessible in a secure manner to facilitate maintenance and repair.

3.Location of critical components may be [SELECT under-ground; above-ground].

4.Manufacturer shall indicate potential equipment failures requiring levels of maintenance greater than those indicated in maintenance manuals, including for accessories, to ensure barrier performance in local conditions and following accidental or intentional impact.

  1. Back-up and Manual Operation.The manufacturer shall describe how the barrier system is intended to respond in even of a power failure and emergency operations.

1.Power failure and emergency operating modes must not compromise safety or security. The system shall be designed to prevent an un-commanded motion or disruption of controls in the event of hydraulic, electrical, or mechanical failure. The system shall be designed to [SELECT open; close; remain in the last commanded position] in the event of hydraulic, electrical, or mechanical failure. Manual override option [SELECT shall; shall not] be provided.

2.The control system must provide back-up and manual operating capability for use in the event of a power failure. The manual operation of the barrier must be simple,with no use of tools or knowledge not identified by the manufacturer and made readily available in advance, and requiring no more than the intended staffing levels of [INSERT number, e.g. 1] person(s) using approximately [INSERT staff physical capacity, e.g. 267 N 60pounds of force]. The barrier must be capable of being returned to the secure position, in manual mode, in no more than [INSERT duration, e.g. 5 minutes].

3.Backup or Uninterrupted Power Supply (UPS) for the master and slave control panels shall ensure barrier operations and must provide, as a minimum, [INSERT number, e.g. 3 or 400[2]] complete cycles (open and shut) without the use of a manual system in the event of a power failure. In the event of main power loss, back-up power will initiate and later return to main power [SELECT by an automatic transfer switch; operator with the use of tools and knowledge identified by the manufacturer and readily available].