Rubric for Evaluation of Wiki

Rubric for Evaluation of Wiki

Adapted from

CATEGORY / Needs Work / Lacks Some Development / Proficient / Exemplary / Sub
Total
Overview of Project / The title page includes minimal content, AND/OR there are several factual errors. / The title page includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors. / The title page includes essential knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge appears to be good. / The title page covers the topic in-depth with details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent.
1-5 / 6-10 / 11-15 / 16-20
Required Folders / There was only one folder included to represent what each group of students would do through their participation in the Wiki. / There were two folders included to represent what each group of students would do through their participation in the Wiki. / There were three folders included to represent what each group of students would do through their participation in the Wiki. / There were at least four folders established to represent what each group of students would do through their participation in the Wiki.
1-2-3 / 4-5-6 / 7-8 / 9-10
Page with Links / An information page with at least one link PER group is included. The links are not quality web sites that are appropriate for students. / An information page with at least two links PER group are included. Some of the links are quality web sites that are appropriate for students. / An information page with at least three links PER group are included. The links are quality web sites that are appropriate for students. / An information page with at least four links PER group are included. The links are quality web sites that are appropriate for students.
1-5 / 6-10 / 11-15 / 16-20
Group Example / The group folder lacks development and there are no graphics used to illustrate the content. / One group folder is completed to serve as an example, although 3 or more elements are either missing or lack development. There is 1 graphic included to illustrate content. / One group folder is completed to serve as an example, although 1-2 elements are either missing or lack development. There are 2 graphics included to illustrate content. / One group folder is completed to serve as an example. All elements are included in the folder, and elements are well-developed. There are at least 3 graphics included to illustrate content.
1-5 / 6-10 / 11-15 / 16-20
Organization / There was no clear or logical organizational structure, just lots of facts. / Content is logically organized for the most part. / Content uses headings or bulleted lists to organize, but the overall organization of topics appears flawed. / Content is well organized, using headings or bulleted lists to group related material.
1-2-3 / 4-5-6 / 7-8 / 9-10
Attractiveness / Makes use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. but these often distract from the presentation content. / Makes use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. but occasionally these detract from the presentation content. / Makes good use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance to presentation. / Makes excellent use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance the presentation.
1-2-3 / 4-5-6 / 7-8 / 9-10
Accuracy / There are more than five or more errors in capitalization, usage, punctuation, and spelling. There are five or more broken links or missing images. / There are three to fourerrors in capitalization, usage, punctuation, and spelling. There are three to four broken links or missing images. / There are one to twoerrors in capitalization, usage, punctuation, and spelling. There are one to two broken links or missing images. / There are noerrors in capitalization, usage, punctuation, and spelling. There are no broken links or missing images.
1-2-3 / 4-5-6 / 7-8 / 9-10
Total / /100