Record of Proceedings Dated 06-04-2016

Record of proceedings dated 06-04-2016

O.P. No. 35 of 2014 & I.A. No. 8 of 2014

RVK Energy Pvt Ltd Vs CE / Vijayawada Zone / APTRANSCO & APTRANSCO

Petition filed u/s 86 (1) (f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 for refund of illegal deductions of O & M charges towards the line and bay connection maintenance expenses and Interim Application also filed by the petitioner u/s 94 (2) of the Electricity Act, 2003 for interim directions against respondents

Sri Thotakura Vizhay Babu, learned counsel representing Sri Challa Gunaranjan, learned counsel for the petitioner is present.

Orders not ready. Hence, for orders, posted to 07-04-2016 at 4:00 PM.

Call on:07-04-2016

at 4:00PM

Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-

MEMBER / PRM MEMBER / PR CHAIRMAN

R.P. No. 19 of 2015 in O.P. No. 19 of 2014

APEPDCL & APSPDCL Vs ---

Petition seeking review of the order dt. 05-06-2015 passed by the Commission in O.P. No. 19 of 2014

Orders not ready. Hence, for orders, posted to 07-04-2016 at 4:00 PM.

Call on:07-04-2016

at 4:00 PM

Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-

MEMBER / PRM MEMBER / PR CHAIRMAN

I.A. No. 21 of 2015 in O.P. No. 1 of 2012

A.P. Ferro Alloys Producers Association & another Vs APEPDCL

Petition u/s 62 r/w 86 of the Electricity Act, 2003 for revisiting of the conditions stipulated in the Retail Supply Tariff Order for the FY 2012-13 for Category of HT-1 (b) consumers

Sri Thotakura Vizhay Babu, learned counsel representing Sri Challa Gunaranjan, learned counsel for the petitioner is present.

Orders pronounced (vide separate order)

“14.Consequently, the petitioners are declared to be not liable to pay any deemed consumption charges to the respondents respectively during the relevant periods for the relevant connections and hence the respondents respectively are not entitled to raise any demands against the petitioners for the same. The Interlocutory Applications are allowed accordingly and the parties shall bear their own costs in these Interlocutory Applications”.

Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-

MEMBER / PRM MEMBER / PR CHAIRMAN

I.A. No. 22 of 2015 in O.P. No. 1 of 2013

A.P. Ferro Alloys Producers Association & 12 others Vs APEPDCL

Petition u/s 62 r/w 86 of the Electricity Act, 2003 for revisiting of the conditions stipulated in the Retail Supply Tariff Order for the FY 2013-14 for the Category of HT-1 (b) consumers

Sri Thotakura Vizhay Babu, learned counsel representing Sri Challa Gunaranjan, learned counsel for the petitioner is present.

Orders pronounced (vide separate order)

“14.Consequently, the petitioners are declared to be not liable to pay any deemed consumption charges to the respondents respectively during the relevant periods for the relevant connections and hence the respondents respectively are not entitled to raise any demands against the petitioners for the same. The Interlocutory Applications are allowed accordingly and the parties shall bear their own costs in these Interlocutory Applications”.

Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-

MEMBER / PRM MEMBER / PR CHAIRMAN

I.A. No. 23 of 2015 in O.P. No. 3 of 2012

A.P. Ferro Alloys Producers Association & 6 others Vs APSPDCL

Petition u/s 62 r/w 86 of the Electricity Act, 2003 for revisiting of the conditions stipulated in the Retail Supply Tariff Order for the FY 2012-13 for the Category of HT-1 (b) consumers

Sri Thotakura Vizhay Babu, learned counsel representing Sri Challa Gunaranjan, learned counsel for the petitioner is present.

Orders pronounced (vide separate order)

“14.Consequently, the petitioners are declared to be not liable to pay any deemed consumption charges to the respondents respectively during the relevant periods for the relevant connections and hence the respondents respectively are not entitled to raise any demands against the petitioners for the same. The Interlocutory Applications are allowed accordingly and the parties shall bear their own costs in these Interlocutory Applications”.

Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-

MEMBER / PRM MEMBER / PR CHAIRMAN

I.A. No. 24 of 2015 in O.P. No. 2 of 2013

A.P. Ferro Alloys Producers Association & 6 others Vs APSPDCL

Petition u/s 62 r/w 86 of the Electricity Act, 2003 for revisiting of the conditions stipulated in the Retail Supply Tariff Order for the FY 2013-14 for Category of HT-1 (b) consumers

Sri Thotakura Vizhay Babu, learned counsel representing Sri Challa Gunaranjan, learned counsel for the petitioner is present.

Orders pronounced (vide separate order)

“14.Consequently, the petitioners are declared to be not liable to pay any deemed consumption charges to the respondents respectively during the relevant periods for the relevant connections and hence the respondents respectively are not entitled to raise any demands against the petitioners for the same. The Interlocutory Applications are allowed accordingly and the parties shall bear their own costs in these Interlocutory Applications”.

Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-

MEMBER / PRM MEMBER / PR CHAIRMAN

I.A. No. 1 of 2016 in O.P. No. 4 of 2011

Rhodium Ferro Alloys Ltd Vs APSPDCL

Petition u/s 62 r/w 86 of the Electricity Act, 2003 for revisiting of the conditions stipulated in the Retail Supply Tariff Order for the FY 2011-12 for the Category of HT-1 (b) consumers

Sri Thotakura Vizhay Babu, learned counsel representing Sri Challa Gunaranjan, learned counsel for the petitioner is present.

Orders pronounced (vide separate order)

“14.Consequently, the petitioners are declared to be not liable to pay any deemed consumption charges to the respondents respectively during the relevant periods for the relevant connections and hence the respondents respectively are not entitled to raise any demands against the petitioners for the same. The Interlocutory Applications are allowed accordingly and the parties shall bear their own costs in these Interlocutory Applications”.

Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-

MEMBER / PRM MEMBER / PR CHAIRMAN

I.A. No. 3 of 2016 in O.P. No. 3 of 2016

APSPDCL Vs APGENCO

Application filed u/s 86 (1) (k) & 94 (2) of the Electricity Act 2003, read with Regulation 55 of APERC (Conduct of Business Regulations) 1999 seeking approval to pay fixed charges arrears to APGENCO for FYs 2014-15 & 2015-16 in pursuance of order dt. 26-03-2016 passed by the Commission in O.P. No. 3 of 2016 in twenty equal annual instalments starting from FY 2017-18, without carrying cost

Sri D.V.S. Someswara Rao, SAO/Comml representing the respondent is present.

At request of Sri D.V.S. Someswara Rao, SAO/Comml representing the respondent, as the petitioner and the respondent are likely to arrive at a consensus on the quantification of the amount payable by the respondent under the orders in O.P.No.3 of 2016 and the mode of payment. Call on 23-04-2016.

Call on:23-04-2016

at 11:00 AM

Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-

MEMBER / PRM MEMBER / PR CHAIRMAN

I.A. No. 4 of 2016 in O.P. No. 3 of 2016

APEPDCL Vs APGENCO

Application filed u/s 86 (1) (k) & 94 (2) of the Electricity Act 2003, read with Regulation 55 of APERC (Conduct of Business Regulations) 1999 seeking approval to pay fixed charges arrears to APGENCO for FYs 2014-15 & 2015-16 in pursuance of order dt. 26-03-2016 passed by the Commission in O.P. No. 3 of 2016 in twenty equal annual instalments starting from FY 2017-18, without carrying cost

Sri D.V.S. Someswara Rao, SAO/Comml representing the respondent is present.

At request of Sri D.V.S. Someswara Rao, SAO/Comml representing the respondent, as the petitioner and the respondent are likely to arrive at a consensus on the quantification of the amount payable by the respondent under the orders in O.P.No.3 of 2016 and the mode of payment. Call on 23-04-2016.

Call on:23-04-2016

at 11:00 AM

Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-

MEMBER / PRM MEMBER / PR CHAIRMAN

- 1 -