2016-2017

President’s Research, Scholarship & Creative Activity

Dean’s Evaluation Form

Applicant Name: ______

RSCA Proposal Title: ______

PLEASE PLACE AN “X” IN THE BOX THAT BEST REPRESENTS YOUR RATING OF THIS PROPOSAL AS COMPARED WITH ALL RSCA PROPOSALS YOU HAVE REVIEWED RECENTLY.

Please indicate:

The number of years you have been evaluating RSCA Proposals: ______

The approximate number of RSCA proposals evaluated in those years: ______

EVALUATIVE CRITERIA / Well Articulated: Ready to implement / ↔ / Good Idea: Needs work on details / ↔ / Interesting Idea: Needs a fair amount of additional thinking / Unable to Judge
Significance of scholarly/artistic goals and outcomes (including publications, performances, exhibitions, or curricular materials). (25%)
Feasibility of proposed activities (including methodology or procedures for attaining goals and outcomes). (25%)
Potential connection to instructional duties (student involvement, relation to courses taught). (10%)
Potential for future external funding. (5%)
Qualifications of proposer to execute proposed plan. (15%)
Professional value of activity to proposer. (10%)
Reasonableness of resources requested (justifies budget and/or time requests). (10%)

Comments: (e.g., Significance in discipline) Please restrict your comments to no more than five sentences.

Signature of Dean: ______

2016-2017

Presidents Research, Scholarship & Creative Activity

Chair’s Evaluation Form

Applicant Name: ______

RSCA Proposal Title: ______

PLEASE PLACE AN “X” IN THE BOX THAT BEST REPRESENTS YOUR RATING OF THIS PROPOSAL AS COMPARED WITH ALL RSCA PROPOSALS YOU HAVE REVIEWED RECENTLY.

Please indicate:

The number of years you have been evaluating RSCA Proposals: ______

The approximate number of RSCA proposals evaluated in those years: ______

EVALUATIVE CRITERIA / Well Articulated: Ready to implement / ↔ / Good Idea: Needs work on details / ↔ / Interesting Idea: Needs a fair amount of additional thinking / Unable to Judge
Significance of scholarly/artistic goals and outcomes (including publications, performances, exhibitions, or curricular materials). (25%)
Feasibility of proposed activities (including methodology or procedures for attaining goals and outcomes). (25%)
Potential connection to instructional duties (student involvement, relation to courses taught). (10%)
Potential for future external funding. (5%)
Qualifications of proposer to execute proposed plan. (15%)
Professional value of activity to proposer. (10%)
Reasonableness of resources requested (justifies budget and/or time requests). (10%)

Comments: (e.g., Significance in discipline) Please restrict your comments to no more than five sentences.

Signature of Chair:______