Checklist of Guidelines for Performing and Writing A Literature Review
Adapted from Preparing Literature Reviews: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, 3rd ed., by M.L. Pan, 2008, Pyrczak Publishing.
Version 1.0
Pre-Research (finding a topic/question)
- Consider personal interests
- Examine textbooks for topic ideas
- Scan titles and abstracts of articles in professional journals
- Brainstorm
- Put possible topics in writing (in the form of a statement/question)
- Consider narrowing a broad topic.
- Don’t fear having to modify later as research progresses.
Searching for literature
- Use databases such as ECONLIT and ECONPAPERS, as well as Google Scholar.
- Know what is in databases (published works, not working papers)
- Consider using traditional internet search engines to find working papers
- Understand how to use Boolean searches on all of the above.
- Use the bibliography of relevant papers to suggest other works
- Maintain a written record of how the literature search was conducted.
- Narrow down based on useful, maybe useful, not useful before reading.
Evaluating and interpreting literature
- Be wary of sources offering “proof” or “facts”. We do not do such things with research.
- Be cautious when a body of literature has a common sampling (or other methodological) flaw.
- Be cautious when quantitative researchers refer to causality, be dubious when qualitative researchers do.
- Use the guidelines in Greenlaw.
- Understand the results, don’t just repeat the numbers.
- It is good practice to write out a critical review of each paper you plan on using, and include this in an annotated biblio, as a quick reference guide to yourself.
Preparing an outline for a first draft of a literature review:
- Go back to middle school: use an outline, keep a standard format.
- Essential elements in the introduction are (1) identifying the topic, (2) establishing its importance
- If there are some very topic specific definitions (ex: Environmental Kuznets, Goodwill), consider defining these in the introduction.
- Consider commenting on the extent and nature of the literature in the introduction.
- Consider describing the objectives and the organization of the literature review near the end of the introduction.
- Group your notes to identify major topics and subtopics for the body of the review
- If you are doing a very long literature review (such as those found in the JEL), consider including a summary at the end of long sections of the review.
- Write a summary of the research as a body, with a discussion that provides conclusions, implications, and suggestions for future (or your own) research.
- Consider sticking to one of the typical formats in economics literature reviews.
Writing the first draft:
- Fill in the topic outline with brief notes
- Write an essay that moves logically from one point to another.
- Cite appropriately. Use the correct format (consider the journal you have in mind or the requirements of the instructor). If more than one source has a single point, cite them all for that point.
- Consult a style manual.
- Avoid very long (read: repetitive and saying the same thing and redundant and see how boring that is?) strings of references for a single point, or even worse, saying the same thing in many different ways each with a separate source. Rather, use “e.g.” when there are a large number of sources that repeat a particular point.
- Use quotations sparingly, if at all.
- Use language that distinguishes between the results of studies and speculation.
- Emphasize stronger studies over weaker ones, use language to indicate that weaker studies are weaker.
- Identify gaps in the literature, point out consistencies and inconsistencies.
- In general, avoid broad generalities (ha ha)
- Be specific.
- Don’t copy tables, describe them.
- Cut and paste is your enemy. It is like a broken crutch, you never know when it will fall out from underneath you. Walk instead.
- Proof, proof, proof. A baby kitten dies every time you print out without doing a spelling/grammar check. But that is not enough. Read to find the things the computer might miss (like there for their, or worse).