Physical Flood Vulnerability of
Residential Properties
in Coastal, Eastern England
Ilan Kelman
Dissertation submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy
September 2002
University of Cambridge, U.K.
Physical Flood Vulnerability of Residential Properties in Coastal, Eastern England
Ilan Kelman
Summary
This study demonstrates that significant improvements could and should be made in the manner in which society manages its risk to natural disasters. The focus is on managing the physical vulnerability of residences (houses and flats) to flood disasters in coastal, eastern England. To complement the extensive knowledge of damage from slow-rise flood depth, this study examines the lateral pressure from flood depth differential between the inside and outside of a residence and flood velocity.
To determine the impacts on residences in coastal, eastern England, Canvey Island on the Thames Estuary and Kingston-upon-Hull on the Humber Estuary were selected as case study sites. Field surveys determined characteristics of the physical vulnerability of residences in these locations to floods. A first-order analysis indicated the failure modes of most prominent concern to be analysed in detail:
The rate of rise of flood water inside a residence, to establish that pressure differentials could damage the residence.
Analysis of glass failure, focused on large, low units in doors.
Analysis of wall failure, focused on cavity walls of unreinforced masonry.
The observations and calculations were applied to developing a new form of vulnerability profiling: two-dimensional “vulnerability matrices” with flood depth differential along one axis, flood velocity along the other axis, and the matrix cells displaying a damage outcome.
The vulnerability matrices were used to illustrate possible disaster management tools. The “loss equivalent percentage” method of describing quantitative risk was presented for simulated storm surge scenarios on Canvey Island. Qualitative decision-making tools and analysis strategies for residence flood vulnerability management were also discussed.
The results apply specifically to modern residences in England because those were the residences observed in the field surveys. The techniques and methods nevertheless could be used for similar analyses for other locations, other residence types, and other disasters. This study provides new knowledge and methods which contribute to understanding, describing, and managing society’s risk to natural disasters.
Table of Contents
Declaration...... ii
Summary...... iii
Table of Contents...... iv
Acknowledgements...... ix
Symbols and Abbreviations...... x
Latin Alphabet...... x
Greek Alphabet...... xii
Other...... xiii
Part I...... 1
1. Coastal Settlements at Risk...... 1
1.1 Background and Justification...... 1
1.2 Coastal Settlements at Risk Project...... 6
1.3 This Dissertation...... 7
1.3.1 Objectives...... 7
1.3.2 Structure...... 7
1.3.3 Preview...... 9
1.4 Terminology and Context...... 9
1.5 Summary...... 12
2. Risk Environment for Residences in Coastal, Eastern England...... 13
2.1 Introduction...... 13
2.2 Quantitative Risk...... 13
2.2.1 Defining Risk...... 13
2.2.2 Defining Hazard and Vulnerability...... 15
2.2.3 Risk as a Loss Function...... 17
2.3 Flood Hazards in Coastal, Eastern England...... 19
2.4 Residence Physical Vulnerability to Flood Hazards in Coastal, Eastern England..20
2.4.1 Introduction...... 20
2.4.2 Past Studies...... 21
2.4.3 Past Studies: Overall Analysis...... 27
2.4.4 Conclusions...... 29
2.5 Developing the Risk Environment...... 29
3. Flood Actions on Residences...... 32
3.1 Introduction...... 32
3.2 Overview of Flood Actions...... 32
3.2.1 Introduction...... 32
3.2.2 Hydrostatic Actions...... 32
3.2.3 Hydrodynamic Actions...... 34
3.2.4 Erosion Actions...... 36
3.2.5 Buoyancy Action...... 37
3.2.6 Debris Actions...... 37
3.2.7 Non-Physical Actions...... 39
3.2.8 Summary and Interactions...... 40
3.3 Scoping the Problem...... 41
3.3.1 Choosing Actions to Study...... 41
3.3.2 Applying the Analysis of Actions...... 44
3.4 Conclusions...... 47
Part II...... 48
4. Case Study Sites...... 48
4.1 Selection Process...... 48
4.2 Canvey Island...... 49
4.3 Kingston-Upon-Hull (Hull)...... 52
4.4 Summary and Conclusions...... 54
5. Residence Survey Method...... 56
5.1 Introduction...... 56
5.2 Previous Studies...... 56
5.3 Residence Definition...... 58
5.4 Survey Method: Data Collected...... 60
5.4.1 Quick Survey...... 61
5.4.2 Photographic Survey...... 62
5.5 Survey Method: Notes and Definitions...... 67
5.5.1 House and Flat...... 67
5.5.2 Exterior Walls...... 67
5.5.3 Storey or Floor Level...... 68
5.5.4 Relative Height of Residences...... 69
5.5.5 Doors, Windows, and Other Openings...... 69
5.5.6 Damage Observed...... 70
5.6 Conclusions...... 70
6. Residence Survey Results...... 71
6.1 Observations: Canvey Island...... 71
6.1.1 Configuration: Photographic Survey...... 71
6.1.2 Configuration: Quick Survey...... 72
6.1.3 Storeys...... 73
6.1.4 Relative Height...... 74
6.1.5 Ground to Ground Floor Bottom...... 75
6.1.6 Wall Height...... 75
6.1.7 Exterior Perimeter...... 76
6.1.8 Plan Area...... 77
6.1.9 Design Purpose...... 78
6.1.10 Age...... 79
6.1.11 Walls...... 79
6.1.12 Doors...... 80
6.1.13 Windows...... 81
6.1.14 Other Openings...... 81
6.1.15 Preliminary Comments on Canvey Island...... 81
6.2 Observations: Hull...... 82
6.2.1 Configuration: Photographic Survey...... 82
6.2.2 Configuration: Quick Survey...... 83
6.2.3 Storeys...... 84
6.2.4 Relative Height...... 85
6.2.5 Ground to Ground Floor Bottom...... 87
6.2.6 Wall Height...... 88
6.2.7 Exterior Perimeter...... 89
6.2.8 Plan Area...... 90
6.2.9 Design Purpose...... 91
6.2.10 Age...... 91
6.2.11 Walls...... 92
6.2.12 Doors...... 92
6.2.13 Windows...... 93
6.2.14 Other Openings...... 94
6.2.15 Preliminary Comments on Hull...... 94
6.3 Observations: Comparing Canvey Island and Hull...... 95
6.4 Revision of Residence Classes...... 96
6.4.1 Redefinition of Configuration...... 96
6.4.2 Correlating A and П...... 98
6.5 Further Discussion...... 103
6.6 Conclusions...... 104
7. Flood Failure Flowchart Prelude...... 105
7.1 Introduction...... 105
7.2 Flood Infiltration Rate...... 105
7.3 Window Failure...... 106
7.3.1 Introduction...... 106
7.3.2 Glass...... 107
7.3.3 Locks, Catches, and Hinges...... 107
7.3.4 Mullions, Transoms, Frames, and Joints...... 108
7.3.5 Attachment Mechanisms...... 108
7.3.6 Conclusions...... 109
7.4 Non-Window Failure...... 110
7.4.1 Wall Failure...... 110
7.4.2 Doors...... 110
7.4.3 Floors...... 111
7.4.4 Foundations...... 113
7.4.5 Roofs...... 114
7.4.6 Summary Thus Far...... 115
7.5 Conclusions...... 115
8. Flood Rise Rate Inside a Residence...... 117
8.1 Theoretical Justification...... 117
8.1.1 Introduction...... 117
8.1.2 Past Studies: Power Law...... 118
8.1.3 Past Studies: Quadratic Formula...... 120
8.1.4 Choosing the Preferred Equation...... 122
8.2 Calculations...... 122
8.2.1 Assumptions...... 122
8.2.2 Infiltration Through Cracks: Length Infiltration...... 123
8.2.3 Infiltration Through Cracks: Area Infiltration...... 123
8.2.4 Infiltration Through Orifices...... 124
8.3 Parameters...... 124
8.4 Results...... 128
8.4.1 FRR By Residence Component...... 128
8.4.2 FRR by Residence Type...... 129
8.4.3 Sensitivity Analysis...... 132
8.5 Discussion...... 132
8.5.1 Validating the Results...... 132
8.5.2 Using the Results...... 133
8.6 Critique...... 134
8.6.1 Concerns with the Calculations...... 134
8.6.2 Concerns with the Model...... 136
8.7 Conclusions...... 138
9. Wall Failure...... 139
9.1 Theoretical Justification...... 139
9.1.1 Introduction...... 139
9.1.2 Past Work: Empirical Evidence...... 139
9.1.3 Past Work: Analysis Techniques...... 145
9.1.4 Failure Mechanism for Cavity Walls...... 147
9.1.5 Conclusions...... 152
9.2 Calculations...... 153
9.2.1 Assumptions...... 153
9.2.2 Definitions...... 155
9.2.3 The Work Equation...... 156
9.2.4 The Work Equation’s Left-Hand Side...... 157
9.2.5 The Work Equation’s Right-Hand Side...... 159
9.2.6 Solving the Work Equation...... 162
9.3 Parameters...... 163
9.3.1 Selecting Parameters...... 163
9.3.2 Summary of Parameters...... 167
9.4 Results...... 168
9.4.1 fdiff for v = 0...... 168
9.4.2 fdiff-v Failure Curves...... 171
9.4.3 Sensitivity Analysis...... 176
9.5 Discussion...... 181
9.5.1 Strength of Wall Panels...... 181
9.5.2 Strengthening Wall Panels...... 182
9.6 Critique...... 184
9.7 Conclusions...... 185
10. Glass Failure...... 187
10.1 Theoretical Justification...... 187
10.1.1 Introduction...... 187
10.1.2 Past Studies...... 187
10.1.3 Thin Plate Theory...... 190
10.1.4 Weibull Failure Probability...... 191
10.1.5 Conclusions...... 192
10.2 Calculations...... 193
10.2.1 Introduction to Aalami and Williams (1975)...... 193
10.2.2 Uniform Load...... 193
10.2.3 Linear Load...... 193
10.2.4 Calculation Method...... 194
10.3 Parameters...... 196
10.3.1 Selecting Parameters and Glazing Properties...... 196
10.3.2 Summary of Parameters...... 202
10.4 Results...... 203
10.4.1 Uniform Loads...... 203
10.4.2 Flood Loads...... 204
10.4.3 Sensitivity Analysis...... 212
10.5 Discussion...... 213
10.5.1 Strength of Glass Panes...... 213
10.5.2 Strengthening Glass Panes...... 214
10.5.3 Summary...... 216
10.6 Critique...... 217
10.6.1 Data Available...... 217
10.6.2 Special Glasses...... 217
10.6.3 Temporal Factors...... 218
10.6.4 In-service Exposure Conditions...... 219
10.6.5 Conclusions...... 220
10.7 Conclusions...... 220
11. Flood Failure Flowchart...... 222
11.1 Introduction...... 222
11.2 Developing the Flood Failure Flowchart...... 222
11.2.1 Roofs...... 222
11.2.2 Non-glass Components of Doors and Windows...... 222
11.2.3 Flood Failure Flowchart...... 223
11.3 Conclusions...... 225
12. Vulnerability Matrices...... 226
12.1 Introduction...... 226
12.2 Procedure...... 226
12.3 Results: Vulnerability Profiles...... 230
12.4 Conclusions...... 246
Part III...... 247
13. Analysis and Application...... 247
13.1 Introduction...... 247
13.2 Risk Quantification: Loss Equivalent Percentages (LEPs)...... 247
13.2.1 Defining Risk as a LEP Index...... 247
13.2.2 Canvey Island Sea Defence Breach Scenarios: Hazard...... 252
13.2.3 Canvey Island Sea Defence Breach Scenarios: Vulnerability and Risk.257
13.2.4 Results for Canvey Island Flood Loss Scenarios...... 260
13.2.5 Discussion and Interpretation of Canvey Island Flood Loss Scenarios..262
13.2.6 Mitigation Options Based on Canvey Island Flood Loss Scenarios....264
13.2.7 Conclusions...... 265
13.3 Risk Quantification: Definitions...... 266
13.3.1 Risk Definition...... 266
13.3.2 Vulnerability Definitions...... 267
13.3.3 Conclusions...... 270
13.4 Analysis Strategies and Decision Making...... 270
13.4.1 Introduction...... 270
13.4.2 Issues of Concern...... 271
13.4.3 Options for Residence Flood Vulnerability Management...... 273
13.4.4 Analysis Strategies for Individual Residences: Sealing...... 274
13.4.5 Analysis Strategies for Individual Residences: Other...... 278
13.4.6 Analysis of Strategies for Communities...... 282
13.4.7 Conclusions...... 285
13.5 Conclusions...... 285
14. Conclusions...... 286
14.1 Achievements of This Dissertation...... 286
14.2 Recommendations for Further Study...... 287
14.2.1 Refining the Vulnerability Matrices and Flood Failure Flowchart.....287
14.2.2 Applying the Vulnerability Matrices and Flood Failure Flowchart.....289
14.3 Final Words...... 290
References...... 291
1