UDUTC Project Evaluation Form
Project Title: ______
Principal Investigator(s): ______
Recommendation
ð Definitely fund
ð Fund if resources are available
ð Encourage revision and resubmission in the future
ð Do not fund
Comments:
Reviewer Name: ______
Affiliation:______
Email: ______
Telephone:______
This page will not be shared with the Principal Investigator(s)
Project Title: ______
Principal Investigator(s): ______
Please rate proposals according to the following criteria. Comments may be added on the extra sheet.
1. Soundness of research plan and potential to produce quality research.
ð 1 (poor) / ð 2 (fair) / ð 3 (average) / ð 4 (good) / ð 5 (excellent)2. Interdisciplinarity in terms of content and members of research team.
ð 1 (poor) / ð 2 (fair) / ð 3 (average) / ð 4 (good) / ð 5 (excellent)3. Consistency with UDUTC theme of Resiliency of Transportation Corridors and capacity to address at least one of targeted areas for research.
ð 1 (poor) / ð 2 (fair) / ð 3 (average) / ð 4 (good) / ð 5 (excellent)4. Qualifications of investigators to complete the work and consistency of scope with proposed timeline and budget.
ð 1 (poor) / ð 2 (fair) / ð 3 (average) / ð 4 (good) / ð 5 (excellent)5. Relevance to research areas of national importance (as identified in Highway Research and Technology: The Need for Greater Investment; the programs of the National Research and Technology Program of the Federal Transit Administration; the U.S. Department of Transportation Research, Development, and Technology Plan; and U.S. DOT’s strategic plan).
ð 1 (poor) / ð 2 (fair) / ð 3 (average) / ð 4 (good) / ð 5 (excellent)6. Relevance to needs of partner organizations.
ð 1 (poor) / ð 2 (fair) / ð 3 (average) / ð 4 (good) / ð 5 (excellent)This page will be shared with the Principal Investigator(s)
Comments:
This page will be shared with the Principal Investigator(s)