MPW 999—Advanced Nonfiction—Memoir as History

Three Units

Spring 2008

Wednesday, 7:00 p.m. to 9:40 p.m.

M. G. Lord

Introduction and Purpose: To See a World In a Grain of Sand, or How to Knit Your Memoir Into a Larger Story (And Get It Published)

This course will explore the ways in which writers use their personal stories to comment on aspects of the wider world. “Creative nonfiction” is an evolving genre that combines recollection with reporting--a linkage beneficial to both reader and writer. Readers can relate more easily to, say, the emblematic struggles of one family than to a dry, abstract account of a social trend or historic period. Writers can focus on a subject of endless fascination—themselves—while still generating the fact-filled narratives that publishers crave.

Students will examine the work of nonfiction masters to see how they achieved their results. They will then attempt to incorporate these devices or approaches in short exercises and a long piece of original nonfiction.

Course Requirements and Grades:

In class, we will discuss texts by Mary McCarthy, James Ellroy, Diane McWhorter, Bernard Cooper, Susan Griffin, D. J. Waldie, A.M. Homes, Joel Agee, James Baldwin and others. Students will be expected to complete one short exercise, a query letter and a magazine-length story during the semester. Students will submit a rough draft of the story to me at mid-term, along with copies to the other members of the class. They will thus be able to receive criticism from their fellow students as well as from me. A final, edited version of the story will be submitted to me on the final day of class.

This is not a lecture course. My role is not to decode the class readings. I expect students to read as writers so that they can discuss what the author of the assigned text achieved and how he or she achieved it. Each student will lead one class discussion; he or she will prepare questions about one of the books on the reading list. I expect students to do all the reading. (The best writers read widely and extensively in the area in which they choose to work.)

We will also critique student work in class. Students will share useful observations about their fellow students’ writing exercises, query letters and articles. This is a breakdown of my grading criteria:

Class participation: 25%

Quality of Writing: 50 %

Exercises/ homework/ submitting work for class critique and critiquing other students’ work: 25%

More than three absences from class will prevent a student from passing the course. Class participation is critical to student grades. If there are long stretches of silence during a discussion period, each student’s grade will drop—even if he or she writes like Tolstoy.

From time to time, visitors—agents, editors or other writers--may visit this class. If this happens, students may have to deviate slightly from the syllabus. The distinguished visitor’s schedule will take precedence—just as it would in real life. Students will learn to be flexible. Inflexibility will have a negative impact on a student’s grade.

For more information about University grading policies, please refer to the USC Grading and Correction of Grades handbook, found at: or

Course Readings/Class Sessions

January 16: Introduction, or Own Your Story

Read “Why I Write” by Joan Didion, “In many ways,” Didion explains, “Writing is the act of saying I, of imposing oneself upon other people, of saying listen to me, see it my way, change your mind.”

Reading Assignment:Mary McCarthy’s Memories of a Catholic Girlhood, which is about nothing less than the difference between truth and fiction. McCarthy juxtaposes perfect short stories about her early life with passages that detail what actually happened.

Writing Assignment: Submit an exaggerated, embellished story along with another story detailing what really happened. Please make copies for your classmates.

January 23: The Limitations of Memory, or What Is Non-Fiction?

Discuss McCarthy and exercises.

Reading Assignment: Foreword to Alice Munro’s The View from Castle Rock, which deals with her family’s immigration from Scotland to North America. This book falls in the ambiguous area between fact and fiction. “Such stories pay more attention to the truth of a life than fiction usually does,” Munro writes, “But not enough to swear on.”

Also read Joel Agee’s “

Writing Assignment: Submit query letters for the magazine-length memoir-as-history piece.

January 30: Making the Political Personal

We will critique the letters in class and continue to discuss fact versus fiction.

Reading Assignment Joel Agee’s Twelve Years: An American Boyhood in East Germany.

February 6: Making the Political Personal, Continued

Reading Assigment: Diane McWhorter’s Carry Me Home: Birmingham, Alabama: The Climactic Battle of the Civil Rights Revolution, a Pulitzer-Prize-winning account of the civil rights movement filtered through the lens of the author’s white, elite Birmingham family.

February 13: Making the Political Personal

Reading Assignment: Susan Griffin’s A Chorus of Stones: The Private Life of War, which relates global violence to family denial and secrecy. (Griffin’s non-linear structure will also open a discussion of structure.)

February 20: Structure in Memoir

Reading Assignment: James Ellroy’s My Dark Places. This book works on two levels. Ellroy attempts to solve the mystery of his mother’s 1958 murder and explores the way in which this childhood trauma sparked his fascination with violence against women.

Writing Assignment: First draft of magazine-length piece due in class the following week.

February 27: Using Memoir to Delineate a Place

Reading Assignment: D. J. Waldie’s Holy Land, an idiosyncratic memoir and rumination on growing up in Lakewood, California. The reader gains a detailed knowledge of Lakewood’s history as well as an emotional understanding of its residents. The rough draft of the magazine-length story will be due in this class. Please make copies for your classmates as well as for me.

March 5: More Memoir and Place

Begin Critique in class of first drafts.

Reading Assignment: M.G. Lord’s Astro Turf: The Private Life of Rocket Science

March 12: Spring Break

March 19: Chocolate-covered Cyanide—Humor and the Powerful Memoir

Continue critique of the first drafts in class.

Reading Assignment: Bernard Cooper’s The Bill From My Father

March 26: The Idea of Family

Continue to critique first drafts

Reading Assignment: A. M. Homes’s The Mistresses’s Daughter. On its surface, the book details Homes’s search for her biological mother, but on a deeper level it engages the reader in an exploration of what it means to be part of a family. A magazine length version of this book appeared in The New Yorker in December 2004.

April 2: The Idea of Family

Discuss Cooper, Homes and first drafts.

Reading Assignment: James Baldwin’sThe Fire Next Time

April 9: Writing the First-Person Polemic

Discuss Baldwin and first or second drafts of magazine-length piece

April 16: Epilogue—Loose Ends, Loose Screws, Loose Lips

Make sure everyone in the class has an opportunity to have his or her first draft critiqued before the end of the semester.

April 23: Submit final draft of the magazine-length story. Celebrate!

Required Texts

Mary McCarthy’s Memories of a Catholic Girlhood

James Ellroy’s My Dark Places

Joel Agee’s Twelve Years

Diane McWhorter’s Carry Me Home: Birmingham, Alabama: The Climactic Battle

A.M. Homes’s The Mistress’s Daughter

D. J. Waldie’s Holy Land: A Suburban Memoir

Susan Griffin’s A Chorus of Stones

James Baldwin’s The Fire Next Time

Bernard Cooper’s The Bill From My Father

M. G. Lord’s Astro Turf

William Zinsser’s On Writing Well

Statement for Students With Disabilities

Any student requesting academic accommodations based on a disability is required to register with Disability Services Programs (DSP) each semester. A letter of verification for approved accommodations can be obtained from DSP. Please be sure the letter is delivered to me as early in the semester as possible. DSP is located in STU 301 and is open 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. The phone number for DSP is 213-740-0776.

Statement on Academic Integrity

USC seeks to maintain an optimal learning environment. General principles of academic honesty include the concept of respect for intellectual property of others, the expectation that individual work will be submitted unless otherwise allowed by the instructor, and the obligations both to protect one’s own academic work from misuse by others as well as to avoid using another’s work as one’s own. All students are expected to understand and abide by these principles.

Students will be referred to the Office of Student Judicial Affairs and Community Standards for further review, should there be any suspicion of academic dishonesty.

The review process can be found at:

1