ATTACHMENT 22b

MDCHT – 2017 NOFA RFA – THRESHOLD CRITERIA – RENEWAL PROJECTS

Project Applicant:

Name of Project:

Type of Project: PH:PSHPH:RRH TH SSO:SO SH

THRESHOLD REVIEW (Completed by HT Staff)
Scoring Factor / Yes/No
A. Applicant attended the Pre-Proposal Workshop or picked up a copy of the RFA
B. Proposal was submitted to HT by the RFA deadline
D. Organization has been in operation for at least 2 years
F. RFA Application Form is signed by the agency official designated to execute contracts
G. Proposal is typed and an un-signed electronic copies was submitted on thumb drive or cd
H. Proposal submission included 1 original, 6 copies
I. Proposal submitted follows the order of proposal as outlined in the RFA, section IV.
J. Proposal meets threshold requirements outlined in section V of HUD’s NOFA publication, including:
1. Applicant has an active/current SAM registration
2. Applicant has a valid DUNS number
3. Applicant has no outstanding or delinquent federal debts unless
(a) a negotiated repayment schedule is established, or
(b) other arrangements satisfactory to HUD are made before the award of funds
4. Applicant has no debarments and/or suspensions with the federal government
5. Applicant disclosed any violations of Federal criminal law
6. Applicant has submitted required certifications as indicated in the NOFA and local RFA
7. Applicant has demonstrated the population served meets program eligibility requirements
8. Applicant has agreed to participate in HMIS
9. Applicant has demonstrated they meet minimum project standards, as evidenced by
(a) meeting goals established in initial application
(b) demonstrating the project met timeliness standards per 24 CFR 578.85
(c) performance standards demonstrate project assisted participants in achieving or maintaining independent
living
(d) accepting TA when offered & history of adequate financial accounting practices
10. Applicant has met HUD financial expectations, as evidenced by
(a) has no outstanding obligation to HUD that is in arrears or for which payment schedule has not been agreed
upon
(b) has no audit finding for which response is overdue or unsatisfactory
(c) has no history of inadequate financial management practices
(d) has no untimely expenditures
(e) has no history of other major capacity issues that affected project operation or performance
(f) has no history of not reimbursing subrecipients for eligible costs in a timely manner
(g) has no history of ineligible program participants, expending funds on ineligible costs, or failing to expend
funds within established timeframes
11. Applicant has demonstrated the project is consistent with the Miami-Dade County Consolidated Plan
12. Applicant has agreed to participate in Coordinated Entry
13. Applicant has agreed to adopt Housing First principles
14. Applicant has documented minimum match requirements
15. Applicant has reasonable costs per PH exit
16. Applicants project is financially feasible
17. Applicant has actively participated in CoC meetings
18. Application is complete and data is consistent
19. Applicant data quality is at or above 95%
20. Applicant bed/utilization rate is at or above 95%