M-DCPS English Language Arts Administrator Debriefing Protocol for i-Ready Data

2016-2017 Grades 3-5 ELA Data Chat Protocol

School ______Completing Administrator ______Date ______

Part I: Predicted Proficiency District Report-Use this report to view the district percentage of students who are likely to be proficient (students at Level 3 and above) by the end of the year and the percentage of students predicted to reach each achievement level based on an analysis of the end-of-year performance of students who tested during the same period.

Part II: Predicted Proficiency School Report - Use this report to view the percentage of students who are likely to be proficient (students at Level 3 and above) by the end of the year and the percentage of students predicted to reach each achievement level at your school based on an analysis of the end-of-year performance of students who tested during the same period.

School Predicted Proficiency Report
Grade / % of Students Likely to be Proficient on FSA by the End of School Year / Level 1 / Level 2 / Level 3 / Level 4 / Level 5 / Students Assessed / Total Students
Overall
3
4
5

Part III:

Predicted Proficiency by Class Report- Use this report to view the percentage of students who are likely to be proficient (students at Level 3 and above) by the end of the year and the percentage of students predicted to reach each achievement level by class based on an analysis of the end-of-year performance of students who tested during the same period.

Part IV: Analyze the Intervention Screener Report

School Summary Intervention Screener Report
Pyramid Tiers / AP1 (Diagnostic 1) Percentage / AP2 (Diagnostic 2) Percentage / AP3 (Diagnostic 3) Percentage
At Risk for Tier 3
Tier 2
Tier 1

Guiding Questions:

1.  How do the reports assist you in:

o  assigning students to intervention?

o  monitoring the effectiveness of intervention and determining needs for staffing/materials?

o  monitoring differentiated instruction?

o  monitoring effective bell to bell instruction during the 90-minute block and intervention?

o  monitoring the components of the “Framework for Effective Instruction” when conducting classroom walkthroughs?

AP1 to AP2 Intervention Screener Comparison Chart Using Standard View
Grade / AP1 (Diagnostic 1) Percentage / AP2 (Diagnostic 2) Percentage / AP2 Subtract AP1
Show points change in percentages using (+, 0, -) see sample below
Tier 1 Percentage / Tier 2
Percentage / Tier 3
Percentage / Tier 1
Percentage / Tier 2
Percentage / Tier 3
Percentage
Sample / 20% / 48% / 32% / 22% / 50% / 28% / *Tier 1 / *Tier 2 / *Tier 3
+2 / +2 / -4
3 / *Tier 1 / *Tier 2 / Tier 3
4 / Tier 1 / Tier 2 / Tier 3
5 / Tier 1 / Tier 2 / Tier 3

After comparing AP1 and AP2 data points in the table above, please complete the following steps:

1.  Use the Detail by Grade section of the Intervention Screener Report to determine schools’ weakest grade level.

2.  Use the Detail by Student section of the Intervention Screener Report to determine the least proficient class in the lowest grade (sort classes using the up/down arrows).

3.  Once the least proficient class(es) are identified, pull each of their Class Profile reports. Use the Performance by Class table to determine the lowest Domain and provide appropriate remediation while keeping in mind FSA Reporting Category percentages.

4.  Once the AP3 results are available, complete the above comparison chart for AP2 and AP3 and repeat above steps 1 through 3 as appropriate in preparation for next year’s school term.

* Tier 1 should show an increase (+)* / *Tier 2 should show an increase (+) or at least remain the same (0). If declines are present they should be offset by increases in Tier 1 / * Tier 3 should show a decrease (-)

* If Tier changes from AP1 to AP2 do not follow suggested increase/decrease trends, please increase use of in-class, after school and/or Saturday School offline resources including but not limited to the following: McGraw-Hill Tier 2 Intervention Handbooks, i-Ready Toolbox (if purchased), and i-Ready Tools for Instruction.