McGill University
School of Social Work
3506 University St., #300
Montreal, QC H3A 2A7
Joint MSW/Law ISP Evaluation
SWRK691
TO: ______DATE: ______
(name of evaluator/adviser)
FROM: Dr. Julia Krane, QY/MSW Program Director
RE: ______
(name of student)
Attached, please find the above noted student’s Social Work/Law Independent Study Project. Please complete the attached Evaluation Form and Comments Sheet and return them by email to , Student Affairs Coordinator, at the School of Social Work. Your evaluation and grade must be received by no later than ______so that the student can meet both Faculty deadlines for graduation.
Please evaluate all relevant items on the Evaluation Form. Please identify any irrelevant items for this particular ISP as “N/A”. Use the Comments Sheet to provide general evaluative comments, specific feedback, and/or an explanation of the assigned grade.
The student receives a copy of the Comments Sheet, along with her/his originally submitted ISP. Corrections to the ISP should be made directly on the ISP, as clearly and concisely as possible, however please note that such corrections are for the student’s interests or uses only as the School does not require the submission of a corrected copy of the ISP.
Please complete all forms in INK (handwritten or a word processed attachment).
/LI
March 2016
McGill University
School of Social Work
Joint MSW/Law ISP Comments Sheet
TO: ______
(name of student)
FROM: ______
(name of evaluator/adviser)
DATE: ______
Comments:______
McGill University
School of Social Work
Joint MSW/Law ISP Evaluation Form (SWRK691)
RE: (Student’s name): ______
ISP TITLE: ______
______
FROM: (Evaluator/Adviser) ______SIGNED: ______DATE: ______GRADE: ____
unsatisfactory / satisfactory / good / very good / excellent / n/aIntroduction
Clear research or practice question
Clear scholarly rationale
Clear practice rationale
Clearly laid out format for the ISP
Literature Review
Thorough review Empirical Scholarship
Thorough review Theoretical Scholarship
Identified Theoretical Framework
Well Organized literature review
Demonstrates need or gap in literature related to the research or practice question
Conclusions
Implications for further research
Implications for practice (broadly defined)
Clearly related to research or practice question
Identified contributions & limitations of study
Format
Well organized ISP
Clearly written ISP
Logical flow from section to section
Free from grammatical errors
Free from typographical errors
Consistent reference style
Appropriate reference selection
●IF DATA COLLECTED & ANALYZED ADD:
Methodology
Appropriate to topic
Clearly described
Appropriately supported by a review of literature on chosen methodology
Major Findings
Thorough in presentation
Coherent in presentation
Freedom from error (quantitative)
Freedom from bias; explicit assumptions
Clearly related to research or practice question & methodology