Joann Larson/CA/KAIPERM
08/26/2005 11:10 AM To
"Julian, Anthony J." <>
cc
@ internet
bcc
Subject
Re: Open CQ action Items - List for Monday and suggestions for San Diego -
Tony need your help
Tony:
Action Item #8 regarding lengths in v2, there is some missing information.
Would you add the following or tell me where I can find the database to do
it:
Add entry for February 1, 2005: CQ Telcon: Need to revisit lengths that we
had agreed to change in response to Frank Oemig's votes to make consistent
with datatype definition in Chapter 2a. Graham approached ARB and they
thought that the ARB guidelines would stand, would be big change,
recommended that we don't do it. PUBs meeting; Pubs opposed to making the
change too. Don't want this to force a new ballot.
Same item, please add motion referenced to May 2, 2005 entry: Straw poll
of intention to make a change in v2.7 to remove length information from
the standard and include it as part of conformance profile. Conformance
would add language to chapter 2B as appropriate from chapter 2 or 2A
regarding the minimum length needed. (Larson/Oemig) 8-0-0
Same item, new entry: August 5, 2005, Length proposal for v2.7 submitted
by Frank Oemig.
We should review this Action Item this Monday if there is quorum. It is no
longer clear to me if we still need this Action item. Maybe we close it
now that there is a proposal. Or, do we bring our straw proposal to the
ARB? That doesn't seem right. Probably it should have gone to the TSC, but
it is too late to get on the agenda. Maybe it should go to the pubs
meeting?
Item 13 should be closed. It is covered by item 8. Let's do that Monday .
Item 15 needs a proposal and then it can be closed. Can you do that Tony?
Looks like you were the one who was on top of that issue.
Item 16, it looks to me like it was closed in May and then we voted again
to close it on August 15.
Item 20, add entry for February 1, 2005, CQ Telcon: Graham approached ARB
and they thought that the ARB guidelines would stand, would be big change,
recommended that we don't do it. PUBs meeting; Pubs opposed to making the
change too. Don't want this to force a new ballot.
Let's put #20 on the agenda for Action Items for Monday. To close because
it is duplicative in intent with #8 and has already been done.
Item 35, maybe add entry for August 5, 2005, Length proposal for v2.7
submitted by Frank Oemig.
We should close this one on Monday in our Action Item Review. It is
duplicative of #8
Item 71 regarding table of tables. Didn't Stan submit this to the ARB this
summer? If so we should add an entry. Also did the ARB approve and is
there new language in the substantivity guide? Let's put this on next
Monday's agenda for Action Items.
Item 88, let's look at this one this Monday when we do Action Item Review.
I think I may have already brought this to PIC's attention but I am not
certain.
Item 105, let's review this Monday. Doug may have completed this
item 109, 110, 117 let's review this Monday don't know which agenda it
needs to be on at San Diego
Item 114, let's review and close this Monday. We have scheduled a session
with Security. Transport Security items are a topic.
Item 954, 957, 958, 963 let's review and hopefully close this Monday
I'm assuming you have closed 16, 26, 50, 97, 112, 113, 111, 46, 47, 955,
956, 959 and 963 per the August 15 minutes, noting the outcome or reason
for closure.
Item 81 needs to go the agenda for Monday Q3 to alert XML and then on
Thursday Q1.
Items 32, 107, 108 need to go on the Monday Q4 agenda, meeting with
Conformance
Item 58, 59, 60 need to go on Tuesday Q1 agenda
Items 33, 34, 51, 55, 962 need to go on the agenda for Tuesday Q2 or Q 3.
Also 55 seems to have some extraneous entries for May 5, 2005
Item 74 needs to on the agenda for Tuesday Q 4 - has overlap with Security
Iterm 90, I don't know if it goes with Infrastructure or with Transport
Abstract.
Item 104, 122 needs to go on Agenda for Wednesday Q1
Item 42, 75 needs to on Wednesday Q1 or Q2 agenda
Item 106 needs to go on Wednesday Q3 agenda - Action Item Review
Item 27 needs to go the Wednesday Q 4 agenda, meeting with Vocab
Item 96, 132 needs to go on Friday Q1 agenda for Action Item Review
Regards,
Joann