Jezebel Judge of U.S. District Court in California arrogates to herself global power;
issues worldwide injunction to force United States Military to permit Sodomites
to serve openly
God-Hating Feminist Federal Judge Virginia Phillips (Riverside, CA) decides after 235 years of
U.S. Military history, that Sodomites should serve openly, despite the Uniform Code of Military
Justice (UCMJ) criminalization of "Sodomy" (Article 125.), and the U.S. Military's heritage, stretching back to the American Revolutionary War days of General George Washington's Continental Army (e.g., General Court Martial March 10, 1778) of expelling sodomites from military service.
Regardless of what the Pro-Sodomite Obama administration does, or what Pro-Sodomite, Jesuit-ruled CFR-member Bush/Obama Republican Secretary of Defense Robert Gates does, the United States Congress has the authority under Article III., Sec. 1. of the United States Constitution to establish, remove, and define the jurisdiction of all lower Federal Courts, and has the authority under Article III., Sec. 2., Clause 2. of the United States Constitution to limit the Appellate Jurisdiction of the United States Supreme Court.
The Sodomy, "Abortion", and Ten Commandments/public prayer in Christ's Name issues can
ALL be resolved if Americans will elect only U.S. Senators and U.S. Congressmen who are CONSTITUTIONALISTS, and who are willing to employ their Article III. Sec. 1. and Sec. 2. authority.
There is no "civil right" to commit sodomy. Sodomy is a sin, a crime against the Laws of God and the laws of nature.
[ KJB - Genesis chapter 19; Leviticus 18:22; Leviticus 20:13; Lamentations 4:6; Amos 4:11; Romans 1:26,27;
1 Corinthians 6:9,10; 2 Peter 2:6-8; Jude v. 7 ]
"Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people.
Proverb 14:34, KJB
"The wicked shall be turned into hell, and all the nations that forget God."
Psalm 9:17, KJB
Steve Lefemine, pro-life missionary
dir., Columbia Christians for Life
Columbia, SC
US Army active duty, 1977-1982, CPT, FA
US Army Reserves, 1982-1993, MAJ, FA
USMA 1977
October 13, 2010 / Revised October 15, 2010 / Revised October 19, 2010
______
______
Judge orders 'don't ask, don't tell' injunction
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101012/ap_on_re_us/us_gays_in_military
Tue Oct 12, 2010 [ excerpts, emphasis added ]
SAN DIEGO – A federal judge issued a worldwide injunction Tuesday immediately stopping enforcement of the
military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy, suspending the 17-year-old ban on openly gay [ CCL: sic - sodomite ] U.S. troops.
U.S. District Judge Virginia Phillips' landmark ruling also ordered the government to suspend and discontinue all pending discharge proceedings and investigations under the policy.
U.S. Department of Justice attorneys have 60 days to appeal. Pentagon and Department of Justice officials said they are reviewing the case and had no immediate comment.
The injunction goes into effect immediately, said Dan Woods, the attorney who represented the Log Cabin Republicans, the gay [ CCL: sic - sodomite ] rights [ CCL: sic ] group that filed the lawsuit in 2004 to stop the ban's enforcement.
continued...
Defense Secretary Robert Gates, a Republican, and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen, the military's top uniformed officer, have both said they support lifting the ban. But Gates and Mullen also have said they would prefer to move slowly.
Gates has ordered a sweeping study, due Dec. 1, that includes a survey of troops and their families.
President Obama agreed to the Pentagon study but also worked with Democrats to write a bill that would have lifted the ban, pending completion of the Defense Department review and certification from the military that troop morale wouldn't suffer.
That legislation passed the House but was blocked in the Senate by Republicans.
Gates has said the purpose of his study isn't to determine whether to change the law something he says is probably inevitable but up for Congress to decide. Instead, the study is intended to determine how to lift the ban without causing serious disruption at a time when troops are fighting two wars.
[ continued ]
______
Judge orders military to stop enforcing 'don't ask, don't tell'
www.cnn.com/2010/US/10/12/judge.dont.ask.order/index.html?iref=obinsite
October 13, 2010 [ excerpt, emphasis added ]
The judge, a Clinton appointee based in the Central District of California, previously ruled that the policy regarding gays [ CCL: sic - sodomites ] serving in the military violated service members' Fifth Amendment rights to due process and freedom of speech, but had delayed issuing the injunction.
______
Federal Judge Orders 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Injunction
www.aolnews.com/nation/article/us-district-judge-virginia-phillips-orders-dont-ask-dont-tell-injunction/19671216
[ excerpts, emphasis added ]
SAN DIEGO (Oct. 12) -- A federal judge ordered the military Tuesday to immediately stop enforcing its ban on openly gay troops, bringing the 17-year "don't ask, don't tell" policy closer than it has ever been to being abolished.
Justice Department attorneys have 60 days to appeal the injunction but did not say what their next step would be.
President Barack Obama has backed a Democratic effort in Congress to repeal the law, rather than in an executive order or in court.
But U.S. District Judge Virginia Phillips' injunction leaves the administration with a choice: Continue defending a law it opposes with an appeal, or do nothing, let the policy be overturned, and add an explosive issue to a midterm election with Republicans poised to make major gains.
Department of Justice and Pentagon officials were reviewing the judge's decision and said they had no immediate comment.
continued...
Phillips, based in Riverside, Calif., issued a landmark ruling on Sept. 9, declaring the policy unconstitutional and asked both sides to give her input about an injunction. The judge said the policy violates due process rights, freedom of speech and the right to petition the government for redress of grievances guaranteed by the First Amendment.
continued...
If the government does not appeal, the injunction cannot be reversed and would remain in effect. If it does, it can seek
a temporary freeze, or stay, of her ruling. An appeal would go to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit.
Either side could then take it to the U.S. Supreme Court.
The Pentagon did not immediately comment, and a Justice Department spokeswoman said the government was reviewing the decision. Meanwhile, a group of 19 Democrat senators signed a letter sent to U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder urging him to let the injunction stand.
[ continued ]
______
______
Related reports and information:
See also www.ChristianLifeandLiberty.net
and www.LefemineForLife.net
Former Alabama State Supreme Court Chief Justice Judge Roy Moore's Art. III, Sec. 2 legislation in
US Congress to limit federal courts (2004):
US House of Representatives: H.R. 3799 - Constitution Restoration Act of 2004
- To limit the jurisdiction of Federal courts in certain cases and promote federalism -
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES - February 11, 2004
http://thomas.loc.gov [ see 108th Congress (2003-2004) ]
US Senate: S.2082 - Constitution Restoration Act of 2004
- To limit the jurisdiction of Federal courts in certain cases and promote federalism -
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES - February 12, 2004
http://thomas.loc.gov [ see 108th Congress (2003-2004) ]
This legislation sought to invoke the constitutional authority given to the US Congress in the US Constitution by the Founding Fathers in 1787, to limit the appellate jurisdiction of the US Supreme Court, and the jurisdiction of the federal courts, by Article III, Section 1. and Section 2. of the US Constitution.
US House Bill H.R. 3799 and US Senate Bill S. 2082 are identical companion bills. These bills focused on removing appellate jurisdiction from the US Supreme Court and removing jurisdiction from the lower federal courts (which were created by statute by Congress) in matters involving "ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF GOD AS THE SOVEREIGN SOURCE OF LAW, LIBERTY, OR GOVERNMENT."
This is one of the most important pieces of legislation to be introduced into Congress in history of the United States of America. The same Art. III. Section 1. and section 2. constitutional authority can be invoked by the US Congress to address the Sodomy and "Abortion" issues, as well as the Ten Commandments / public prayer in Christ's Name issues which are addressed by H.R. 3799 and S.2082.
______
HR 2533, "Sanctity of Life Act of 2009" [removes jurisdiction of Federal Courts] - Introduced in US House, May 20, 2009
Go to: http://thomas.loc.gov/
PRESIDENT BUSH and CONGRESS
COULD END ABORTION IN AMERICA IN ONE WEEK
http://christianlifeandliberty.net/CONLAW08.DOC
June 21, 2005
US House limits jurisdiction of Federal Courts regarding the Pledge of Allegiance
Employs Article III., Section 2. constitutional power of the US Congress to limit
the appellate jurisdiction of the US supreme Court:
This same Article III., Section 2. constitutional power of the US Congress to limit the appellate jurisdiction of the
US supreme Court can be further applied to protect the God-ordained institution of marriage, to protect state-level laws banning acts of sodomy, to protect federal and state laws banning abortion, and to protect the freedom of religious expression that is guaranteed by the First Amendment of the US Constitution, vis-a-vis public displays
of the Ten Commandments, and public prayer in the Name of Jesus.
http://christianlifeandliberty.net/CONSTLAW06-01.DOC
July 2006
PRESIDENT BUSH and CONGRESS COULD END ABORTION IN AMERICA IN ONE WEEK:
President Bush and the US Congress have the power NOW to end abortion in America in one week:
Pass HR 552, the "Right to Life Act", amended with the addition of the Article III., Section 2. power of the US Congress
in the US Constitution to limit the appellate jurisdiction of the US supreme Court, and the complete jurisdiction of the
lower federal courts (US District Courts and US Circuit Courts of Appeal, which were created by Congress by federal statute,
and could even be eliminated by Congress by federal statute, let alone have their jurisdictions limited).
[ see HR 552 at http://thomas.loc.gov ]
http://christianlifeandliberty.net/CCL05-21.doc
December 9, 2005
JULY 22, 2005 - Yearlong anniversary of House MPA
vote to remove jurisdiction from Supreme Court on DOMA
Today, July 22, is the yearlong anniversary of the 2004 vote by the US House to pass the
Marriage Protection Act (HR 3313, 108th Congress), removing jurisdiction from the
US Supreme Court and the lower federal courts over cases concerning the
Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) passed in 1996.
www.christianlifeandliberty.net/CONLAW10.DOC
July 22, 2005
Sanctity of Life Act - HR 2597, sponsored by Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX)
Ending Pro-Abortion Judicial Tyranny
Article III, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution states:
"The Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact, with such exceptions,
and under such regulations as the Congress shall make."
www.prolifealliance.com/sanctity%20of%20life%20act.html
2007
Excerpt from Article VI., U.S. Constitution
http://www.christianlifeandliberty.net/CONLAW04.DOC
Presidents Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson: The Supreme Court is not the final arbiter of the Constitution
http://www.christianlifeandliberty.net/CONLAW05.DOC
"Abortion is not legal" - Christine Ross and Herbert W. Titus, JD
http://www.christianlifeandliberty.net/HerbTitus0501.doc
______
______
"When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice:
but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn." Proverb 29:2, KJB
Do Americans, and particularly Christian Americans wish to see righteous civil government
in America ?
How many Christians in America are willing to agree with the Bible, the Word of God
(and our founding fathers) that the basic, starting qualifications for civil leaders in America (or any nation) are that they are:
1) Christians, and 2) Men.
If you do not agree, it is because you do not have a Biblical Worldview. [ e.g., Matthew 4:4;
Ps. 33:12; Psalm 9:17; Proverb 14:34; 2 Samuel 23:2; Psalm 2; Romans 13:1,4; Psalm 89:14; Psalm 97:2, 1 Peter 2:14 ]
Begin reading the historical documents of America, especially the excerpts from the early State Constitutions beginning in 1776, the year of American Independence, to confirm in the mind of the reader the historical facts regarding the various requirements by States
in early America, that civil leaders must have a Christian profession:
No King but King Jesus! (Yeshua Messiah)
Declarations and Evidences of Christian Faith in America’s Colonial Charters, State Constitutions,
and other Historical Documents during over 375 Years of American History: 1606 to 1982
www.christianlifeandliberty.net/NoKingbutKingJesus.doc
What does the Word of God say about the God-ordained roles of men and women ?
According to God's Creation-order, as revealed in the Bible, what roles has HE assigned
to men and to women ?
God's creation-order design is for men to serve as the heads of households (e.g., Ephesians 5:22-33),
to serve as the elders and pastors of churches (e.g., 1 Timothy 2:11-15; 1 Timothy 3:1-7; Titus 1:5-9),
and to serve as civil ministers / magistrates in civil government. It is not God's perfect will for
women to rule over men in the family, church, or civil government (including the armed forces -
and it is not God's will for women to be the warriors-soldiers in a society). When women are in
headship / rulership positions over men, it is a sign, judgment, and indictment against the men,
who are failing to fulfill their God-ordained roles. It is a curse upon everyone, men, women, and children. It is a curse upon a nation (e.g., Isaiah 3:12).
Biblical Standards for Choosing Civil Magistrates
by William Einwechter, July 7, 2004
www.visionforumministries.org/issues/ballot_box/biblical_standards_for_choosin.aspx
William Einwechter (Th.M.) is an ordained minister and an elder at Immanuel Free Reformed Church in Ephrata, Pennsylvania.
He and his wife, Linda, are the homeschooling parents of ten children.
Should Christians Support a Woman for the Office of Civil Magistrate?
by William Einwechter, July 8, 2004
www.visionforumministries.org/issues/ballot_box/should_christians_support_a_wo.aspx
William Einwechter (Th.M.) is an ordained minister and an elder at Immanuel Free Reformed Church in Ephrata, Pennsylvania.
He and his wife, Linda, are the homeschooling parents of ten children.
His Creation Order
By Angela Wittman
http://angelawittman.blogspot.com/2010/06/his-creation-order-wives-to-be-discreet.html
Wednesday, June 9, 2010
The Feminism of the Mothers is the Destruction of the Daughters
by Sarah Zes, January 14, 2004
www.christianlifeandliberty.net/2009-12-11-Feminism-of-the-Mothers-is-the-Destruction-of-the-Daughters-Jan-14-2004.doc