AP WG CC

8/16/201310AMET

Attendees

JD Nolen, Cerner, co-Chair, notetaker for meeting

Jeffery Karp, CAP

GunterHaroske, Krankenhaus Dresden-Friedrichstadt

Ron Van Duyne, CDC (mic issues, only was able to listen)

Planned Agenda

  1. Planning for September WG
  2. Group health/business
  3. New topics
  4. AOB

Notes

  1. September WG news. JD went over the meeting agenda. Group covered needs for dial-in at meeting for remote member participation.

TODO: JD will research alternate means and update the group with feasibility

  1. Jeffery and Gunter raised the new information that has appeared in the IHE space with respect to ASPR. IHE has started to move the APSR in a more generic fashion. This mirrors a similar thread at the May WGM that covered the specimen model work by HL7 work. Gunter shared the following links to the group:

Wiki:

APSR:

TODO: JD has reached out the Mary Kennedy (CAP) for information about this news and the potential for her providing an update to the group.

  1. Biomarkers work pushed by CG…a dictionary of markers. Jeffery asked about this, as this had been a topic of concern/overlap between AP and CG, and CAP is driving this as well.

TODO: JD will ask CG for an update to be socialized.

  1. JD introduced the group to trello as a possible tool to help the group move forward:

TODO: JD will start to put content out there as a test drive

  1. Imaging: Jeffery asked the question about what the AP role in this is with respect to the communication of images in the lab. When you look at DICOM being the keeper of the image storage format (and some workflow), IHE keeping the workflow (XDS), can HL7 AP provide the standard for the communication. The group discussed the necessary and sufficient conditions surrounding this such as
  2. Where is the image located (storage location, etc.)?
  3. What is the image?
  4. What part of the case does it represent?

Another aspect was the governance around the movement of images (privileges, etc.). The group covered what is the best avenue or vehicle for this. The consensus was an informative ballot, similar in spirit to the Unique ID.

TODO: More discussion

  1. Next call planned for 2 weeks down the road

TODO: JD scheduling