INTERNAL EVALUATION TOOLS 517543-LLP-2011-DK-KA2-KA2MP
Partner: UPVDate: August 2012
Period covered by this review: 1 Jan. 2012 to 30Jun. 2012
Please complete this form to record the activities and progress in the period.
Communication:Which partners have you had communications with?
How often and in which way have you communicated with partners? / Communication has taken place regularly with all partners in the project, specially through:
a)the 3-day launch meeting in Brussels in January 2012
b)the e-mail discussion list
Basically regarding Clilstore design issues, providing feedback on tool development issues and workshop.
Innovatory aspects:
Describe any innovatory aspects to your activities. / Mobile site testing with iPhone and iPad. Testing suggested software such as iPadio for audio recording on iPads.
Management:
Do you feel that information relating to the management of the project is sufficient, relevant and effective? (Please comment).
Give a rating on a scale of 5 to 1.
5 being the most positive. / Yes, management-wise the project is very efficient. Having all relevant project documents on the project website is extremely useful. Also, having been given a copy of all the necessary administrative documents in a USB drive at the start of the project has also been very helpful for organisational matters.
Rating: 5
Dissemination:
List of dissemination activities you have been engaged in. / -Uploading project info onto EURODIS dissemination database
-Presentation of project to colleagues from the Applied Linguistics Department, UPV
-Link of TOOLS project website to personal UPV website
-Project info disseminated through EUROCALL account in LinkedIn
-Project info disseminated through EUROCALL account on Facebook
External impact/mainstreams:
Any multiplier effect/impact. / UPV has an open repository of educational videos in a system called Politube. All of the language learning videos posted there may be exploited educationally in Clilstore
Overall comment: / The enthusiasm and commitment of all the partners to the project is admirable. This is basically due to the driving force of the project coordinator, Kent Andersen
Summary of Local Activities in the period:
-Translation of project dissemination leaflet into Spanish.
-Dissemination activities, particularly through digital means.
Milestones met:
-Dissemination of project locally
-Dissemination of project through personal UPV website
-Dissemination of projectthrough the EURODIS website
-Dissemination of project through the EUROCALL account on Facebook
-Dissemination of project through the EUROCALL account on LinkedIn
Delays (if any) in planned activities and outputs:
If applicable how will the team compensate for the delays and catch up:
Other comments:
It’s very helpful to have a Dropbox account for the project and to be able to jointly build upon project documents.
Working on the project is a very enjoyable experience
Partnership progress review Page 1 of 2