Interim Whole School Report 2012Tiree High
Interim SQA Pre Appeal Whole School Reports
Purpose of reports
These reports provide staff development materials to support self-evaluation and improvement processes in schools.
They should be used in conjunction with our supporting documents:-
- ‘SQA Analysis and Links to Learning and Teaching’ and
- ‘Interpretation Guidance 2012’.
There are also materials on the ScotXed website to help users interpret the statistics.
Reports Important Note
These are interim reports, and will be replaced once we have all the corrected data from Scotxed.
Please note the following:-
- Comparator schools data used in creating boxplots have been based on those used in our 2011 post appeal reports. The data have been updated to exclude closed schools. As a result the data, and consequently the boxplots, differ from those in the initial version of STACs.
- Points profile and staying on rate data are incomplete because the relevant datasets have yet to be published by ScotXed.
- Data that are missing from course reports will also be missing from the summary tables in this report.
What’s New
Some changes have been made to the style of the Highlight Reports. The most obvious change is the separation of the S4 Subject Aggregate highlights from the S4 Course highlights. Also, the text formatting used to highlight some rows in the Course Summary section have been revised so that they can be distinguished when the reports are printed in monochrome.
More detailed information about this report is provided in the document Interpretation Guidance 2012.
Copyright notice
The copyright owners grant the right to the Schools and Education Authorities, which are the subject of the report, to copy and to use this document for internal purposes only.
The Freedom of Information Scotland Act 2002 does not convey a right to re-use this information in a way that would infringe this copyright, for example by issuing copies to the public or for inclusion in commercial publications.
It does not however exempt authorities from disclosing this information if a FOI request is made, unless data in the reports relate to small numbers of pupils and so may allow the identification of individuals. Recipients of the information, however, will not be able to reproduce that information without seeking permission from the copyright holders.
Since much of the data are derived from STACS, the use of these reports is also subject to the ScotXed protocol. It is the responsibility of the users of these reports to ensure that they are familiar with the protocol and abide by its provisions.
Data Sources
The major source of data for the reports is the STACs online system published by SGED. We also rely on a further set of data that are only provided by ScotXed as additional data files. A limited number of statistics are derived from candidate level data that have been provided by SQA to schools and authorities for the generation of the August reports. These are combined with the candidates’ stage and gender data provided by schools via the LA. For example, the scatterplots that are included in course reports are created from such data and are not identical in appearance to those published on the STACs system. Another example are the S4 Subject Aggregate RV statistics for which there are no equivalents in STACs.
This report also provides contextual data, including information on free meal registration and attendance and absence. Note that the most recently published data on attendance and absence relate to the 2009-10 academic session. These data are published by SGED outwith the ScotXed publication framework.
Background Data
School Roll
2005 / 2006 / 2007 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012S4 / 8 / 8 / 8 / 9 / 8 / 15 / 10 / 7
S5 Sep / 11 / 8 / 8 / 6 / 8 / 8 / 12
All / S5 Jan / 10 / 8 / 7 / 4 / 8 / 8 / 11 / 8
S6 / 4 / 6 / 6 / 7 / 6 / 6 / 7
S1-S6 / 49 / 49 / 54 / 55 / 47 / 49 / 46 / 29
S4 / 2 / 4 / 3 / 4 / 6 / 5 / 6 / 4
S5 Sep / 4 / 2 / 4 / 2 / 3 / 6 / 3
Male / S5 Jan / 4 / 2 / 4 / 1 / 3 / 6 / 2 / 4
S6 / 1 / 2 / 2 / 4 / 1 / 4
S1-S6 / 18 / 21 / 23 / 27 / 24 / 23 / 21 / 11
S4 / 6 / 4 / 5 / 5 / 2 / 10 / 4 / 3
S5 Sep / 7 / 6 / 4 / 4 / 5 / 2 / 9
Female / S5 Jan / 6 / 6 / 3 / 3 / 5 / 2 / 9 / 4
S6 / 3 / 4 / 4 / 3 / 5 / 2 / 7
S1-S6 / 31 / 28 / 31 / 28 / 23 / 26 / 25 / 18
Staying on Rates
NCD / Percentage2005 / 2006 / 2007 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012 / 2005 / 2006 / 2007 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012
Sept S5 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 7 / 2 / 100 / 7 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 75 / 89 / 100 / 80 / 100
All / Jan S5 / 1 / 100 / 1 / 10 / 1 / 100 / 6 / 91 / 100 / 88 / 50 / 89 / 100 / 73 / 80
Sept S6 / 9 / 6 / 1 / 1 / 2 / 3 / 44 / 55 / 75 / 88 / 75 / 75 / 58
Sept S5 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 8 / 6 / 100 / 10 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 67 / 75 / 100 / 60 / 100
Male / Jan S5 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 10 / 3 / 100 / 10 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 33 / 75 / 100 / 40 / 67
Sept S6 / 6 / 6 / 100 / 100 / 10 / 4 / 50 / 50 / 100 / 100 / 33 / 67
Sept S5 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 6 / 100 / 100 / 3 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 80 / 100 / 100 / 90 / 100
Female / Jan S5 / 1 / 100 / 4 / 8 / 100 / 100 / 2 / 86 / 100 / 75 / 60 / 100 / 100 / 90 / 100
Sept S6 / 9 / 6 / 4 / 2 / 100 / 100 / 43 / 57 / 67 / 75 / 100 / 100 / 78
Free Meal Entitlement (FME), Attendance, Absence and Exclusions
NCD / Percentage2005 / 2006 / 2007 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012 / 2005 / 2006 / 2007 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012
FME / 8 / 4 / 10 / 10 / 10 / 10 / * / 8.2 / 17.3 / 1.9 / 0.0 / 0.0 / 2.3 / *
Attendance / 1 / 1 / 1 / 3 / 4 / 1 / 3 / 95.2 / 95.0 / 94.7 / 93.2 / 92.6 / 94.8 / 92.6 / *
Auth Absence / 10 / 9 / 8 / 8 / 9 / 10 / 10 / 4.0 / 4.8 / 5.2 / 5.0 / 4.3 / 3.9 / 3.3 / *
Unauth Absence / 6 / 9 / 10 / 5 / 3 / 7 / 3 / 0.8 / 0.2 / 0.0 / 1.7 / 3.1 / 1.3 / 4.0 / *
Temp Exclusions / 10 / 10 / 10 / 8 / 10 / 9 / 3 / 0.0 / 0.0 / 0.0 / 0.1 / 0.0 / 0.0 / 0.2 / *
Cumulative Whole School Attainment
By end of S4
The following tables show percentages of pupils gaining awards at the stated levels by the end of S4. Percentages are based on the relevant S4 roll.
All Candidates
NCD / Percentage2005 / 2006 / 2007 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012 / 2005 / 2006 / 2007 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012
Eng Lev 3 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 8 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 93 / 100 / 100
Maths Lev 3 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 8 / 100 / 10 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 93 / 100 / 71
Eng & Maths / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 6 / 100 / 10 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 93 / 100 / 71
5+ Level 3 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 6 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 93 / 100 / 100
5+ Level 4 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 3 / 5 / 2 / 10 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 88 / 80 / 90 / 57
5+ Level 5 / 1 / 1 / 2 / 6 / 1 / 6 / 2 / 10 / 75 / 75 / 50 / 33 / 75 / 33 / 50 / 14
1+ Level 6 / 0 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 13 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 7 / 0 / 0
Male Candidates
NCD / Percentage2005 / 2006 / 2007 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012 / 2005 / 2006 / 2007 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012
Eng Lev 3 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100
Maths Lev 3 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 10 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 50
Eng & Maths / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 10 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 50
5+ Level 3 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100
5+ Level 4 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 4 / 10 / 4 / 10 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 83 / 60 / 83 / 50
5+ Level 5 / 100 / 100 / 4 / 7 / 1 / 0 / 1 / 0 / 100 / 100 / 33 / 25 / 83 / 0 / 50 / 0
1+ Level 6 / 0 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 25 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
Female Candidates
NCD / Percentage2005 / 2006 / 2007 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012 / 2005 / 2006 / 2007 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012
Eng Lev 3 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 9 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 90 / 100 / 100
Maths Lev 3 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 9 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 90 / 100 / 100
Eng & Maths / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 8 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 90 / 100 / 100
5+ Level 3 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 8 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 90 / 100 / 100
5+ Level 4 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 3 / 100 / 10 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 90 / 100 / 67
5+ Level 5 / 1 / 3 / 1 / 5 / 3 / 3 / 3 / 7 / 67 / 50 / 60 / 40 / 50 / 50 / 50 / 33
1+ Level 6 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 10 / 0 / 0
By the end of S5
The following tables show percentages of pupils gaining awards at the stated levels by the end of S5. Percentages are based on the relevant S4 roll.
All Candidates
NCD / Percentage2005 / 2006 / 2007 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012 / 2005 / 2006 / 2007 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012
Eng & Maths / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 7 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 93 / 100
5+ Level 3 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 6 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 93 / 100
5+ Level 4 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 6 / 3 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 80 / 90
5+ Level 5 / 2 / 1 / 1 / 2 / 1 / 1 / 3 / 1 / 64 / 88 / 75 / 63 / 67 / 88 / 60 / 70
1+ Level 6 / 1 / 1 / 1 / 2 / 2 / 1 / 4 / 4 / 64 / 88 / 63 / 50 / 56 / 88 / 47 / 50
3+ Level 6 / 6 / 1 / 8 / 4 / 9 / 1 / 9 / 1 / 18 / 50 / 13 / 25 / 11 / 75 / 13 / 50
5+ Level 6 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 4 / 1 / 8 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 11 / 25 / 7 / 30
1+ Level 7 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
Male Candidates
NCD / Percentage2005 / 2006 / 2007 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012 / 2005 / 2006 / 2007 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012
Eng & Maths / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100
5+ Level 3 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100
5+ Level 4 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 10 / 4 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 60 / 83
5+ Level 5 / 3 / 100 / 100 / 1 / 3 / 1 / 10 / 4 / 50 / 100 / 100 / 67 / 50 / 83 / 20 / 50
1+ Level 6 / 2 / 100 / 100 / 5 / 8 / 1 / 0 / 3 / 50 / 100 / 100 / 33 / 25 / 83 / 0 / 50
3+ Level 6 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3 / 1 / 0 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 25 / 83 / 0 / 50
5+ Level 6 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 1 / 1 / 0 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 25 / 33 / 0 / 33
1+ Level 7 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
Female Candidates
NCD / Percentage2005 / 2006 / 2007 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012 / 2005 / 2006 / 2007 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012
Eng & Maths / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 9 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 90 / 100
5+ Level 3 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 8 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 90 / 100
5+ Level 4 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 4 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 90 / 100
5+ Level 5 / 2 / 1 / 6 / 3 / 1 / 100 / 1 / 100 / 71 / 83 / 50 / 60 / 80 / 100 / 80 / 100
1+ Level 6 / 1 / 1 / 9 / 2 / 1 / 100 / 1 / 5 / 71 / 83 / 25 / 60 / 80 / 100 / 70 / 50
3+ Level 6 / 4 / 1 / 5 / 2 / 0 / 1 / 8 / 1 / 29 / 67 / 25 / 40 / 0 / 50 / 20 / 50
5+ Level 6 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 6 / 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 10 / 25
1+ Level 7 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
By the end of S6
The following tables show percentages of pupils gaining awards at the stated levels by the end of S6. Percentages are based on the relevant S4 roll.
All Candidates
NCD / Percentage2005 / 2006 / 2007 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012 / 2005 / 2006 / 2007 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012
Eng & Maths / 10 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 7 / 82 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 93
5+ Level 3 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 6 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 93
5+ Level 4 / 2 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 7 / 91 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 80
5+ Level 5 / 4 / 2 / 1 / 1 / 2 / 1 / 1 / 4 / 55 / 64 / 88 / 88 / 63 / 78 / 88 / 60
1+ Level 6 / 7 / 1 / 1 / 1 / 4 / 3 / 1 / 7 / 36 / 73 / 88 / 88 / 50 / 56 / 88 / 47
3+ Level 6 / 6 / 2 / 1 / 1 / 7 / 2 / 1 / 6 / 27 / 45 / 63 / 50 / 25 / 44 / 75 / 33
5+ Level 6 / 5 / 2 / 3 / 3 / 0 / 9 / 2 / 7 / 18 / 27 / 25 / 25 / 0 / 11 / 38 / 20
1+ Level 7 / 0 / 2 / 1 / 5 / 0 / 6 / 2 / 2 / 0 / 18 / 25 / 13 / 0 / 11 / 25 / 27
Male Candidates
NCD / Percentage2005 / 2006 / 2007 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012 / 2005 / 2006 / 2007 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012
Eng & Maths / 10 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 50 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100
5+ Level 3 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100
5+ Level 4 / 6 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 10 / 75 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 60
5+ Level 5 / 9 / 3 / 100 / 100 / 1 / 4 / 1 / 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 / 100 / 67 / 50 / 83 / 20
1+ Level 6 / 8 / 2 / 100 / 100 / 7 / 9 / 1 / 0 / 25 / 50 / 100 / 100 / 33 / 25 / 83 / 0
3+ Level 6 / 5 / 1 / 1 / 1 / 0 / 6 / 1 / 0 / 25 / 50 / 50 / 50 / 0 / 25 / 83 / 0
5+ Level 6 / 2 / 2 / 0 / 2 / 0 / 3 / 2 / 0 / 25 / 25 / 0 / 25 / 0 / 25 / 33 / 0
1+ Level 7 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 2 / 4 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 25 / 17 / 0
Female Candidates
NCD / Percentage2005 / 2006 / 2007 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012 / 2005 / 2006 / 2007 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012
Eng & Maths / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 9 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 90
5+ Level 3 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 8 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 90
5+ Level 4 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 4 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 90
5+ Level 5 / 2 / 2 / 1 / 1 / 4 / 100 / 100 / 1 / 71 / 71 / 83 / 75 / 60 / 100 / 100 / 80
1+ Level 6 / 7 / 1 / 1 / 1 / 3 / 1 / 100 / 2 / 43 / 86 / 83 / 75 / 60 / 80 / 100 / 70
3+ Level 6 / 7 / 3 / 1 / 2 / 4 / 1 / 3 / 3 / 29 / 43 / 67 / 50 / 40 / 60 / 50 / 50
5+ Level 6 / 7 / 3 / 2 / 4 / 0 / 0 / 1 / 5 / 14 / 29 / 33 / 25 / 0 / 0 / 50 / 30
1+ Level 7 / 0 / 1 / 1 / 2 / 0 / 0 / 1 / 1 / 0 / 29 / 33 / 25 / 0 / 0 / 50 / 40
Cumulative Whole School Attainment by Cohort
The following tables show NCDs and percentages for pupils gaining awards at the stated levels. Each column shows the values over a three year period. The first row shows attainment by the end of S4, the second row shows attainment by the same cohort by the end of S5 and third row shows attainment by the end of S6. Normally, the three NCD values in a column will be similar.
Progress from 5+ SCQF Level 5 by S4 to 5+ SCQF Level 6 by S6
All Candidates
NCD / Percentage04-06 / 05-07 / 06-08 / 07-09 / 08-10 / 09-11 / 10-12 / 11-12 / 04-06 / 05-07 / 06-08 / 07-09 / 08-10 / 09-11 / 10-12 / 11-12
5+ Level 5 by end S4 / 1 / 1 / 1 / 2 / 6 / 1 / 6 / 2 / 55 / 75 / 75 / 50 / 33 / 75 / 33 / 50
3+ Level 6 by end S5 / 6 / 1 / 8 / 4 / 9 / 1 / 9 / 1 / 18 / 50 / 13 / 25 / 11 / 75 / 13 / 50
5+ Level 6 by end S6 / 2 / 3 / 3 / 0 / 9 / 2 / 7 / 27 / 25 / 25 / 0 / 11 / 38 / 20
Male Candidates
NCD / Percentage04-06 / 05-07 / 06-08 / 07-09 / 08-10 / 09-11 / 10-12 / 11-12 / 04-06 / 05-07 / 06-08 / 07-09 / 08-10 / 09-11 / 10-12 / 11-12
5+ Level 5 by end S4 / 1 / 100 / 100 / 4 / 7 / 1 / 0 / 1 / 50 / 100 / 100 / 33 / 25 / 83 / 0 / 50
3+ Level 6 by end S5 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3 / 1 / 0 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 25 / 83 / 0 / 50
5+ Level 6 by end S6 / 2 / 0 / 2 / 0 / 3 / 2 / 0 / 25 / 0 / 25 / 0 / 25 / 33 / 0
Female Candidates
NCD / Percentage04-06 / 05-07 / 06-08 / 07-09 / 08-10 / 09-11 / 10-12 / 11-12 / 04-06 / 05-07 / 06-08 / 07-09 / 08-10 / 09-11 / 10-12 / 11-12
5+ Level 5 by end S4 / 2 / 1 / 3 / 1 / 5 / 3 / 3 / 3 / 57 / 67 / 50 / 60 / 40 / 50 / 50 / 50
3+ Level 6 by end S5 / 4 / 1 / 5 / 2 / 0 / 1 / 8 / 1 / 29 / 67 / 25 / 40 / 0 / 50 / 20 / 50
5+ Level 6 by end S6 / 3 / 2 / 4 / 0 / 0 / 1 / 5 / 29 / 33 / 25 / 0 / 0 / 50 / 30
Whole School Measures - Three Year Averages
The following tables show three year averages of percentages of pupils gaining the stated combinations of awards by the end of S6. Percentages are based on the relevant aggregated S4 roll data.
All Candidates
NCD / Percentage03-05 / 04-06 / 05-07 / 06-08 / 07-09 / 08-10 / 09-11 / 10-12 / 03-05 / 04-06 / 05-07 / 06-08 / 07-09 / 08-10 / 09-11 / 10-12
Eng & Maths / 5 / 5 / 6 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 3 / 94 / 94 / 93 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 97
5+ Level 3 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 3 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 97
5+ Level 4 / 1 / 1 / 1 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 2 / 94 / 94 / 97 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 91
5+ Level 5 / 4 / 3 / 1 / 1 / 1 / 1 / 1 / 1 / 53 / 58 / 67 / 78 / 79 / 76 / 76 / 72
1+ Level 6 / 5 / 2 / 1 / 1 / 1 / 1 / 2 / 2 / 44 / 55 / 63 / 81 / 75 / 64 / 64 / 59
3+ Level 6 / 5 / 4 / 2 / 1 / 2 / 3 / 2 / 2 / 32 / 35 / 43 / 52 / 46 / 40 / 48 / 47
5+ Level 6 / 7 / 4 / 3 / 3 / 6 / 9 / 7 / 5 / 15 / 23 / 23 / 26 / 17 / 12 / 16 / 22
Male Candidates
NCD / Percentage03-05 / 04-06 / 05-07 / 06-08 / 07-09 / 08-10 / 09-11 / 10-12 / 03-05 / 04-06 / 05-07 / 06-08 / 07-09 / 08-10 / 09-11 / 10-12
Eng & Maths / 8 / 9 / 10 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 89 / 86 / 80 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100
5+ Level 3 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100
5+ Level 4 / 2 / 3 / 2 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 3 / 89 / 86 / 90 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 87
5+ Level 5 / 5 / 5 / 3 / 1 / 1 / 1 / 1 / 4 / 44 / 43 / 50 / 80 / 89 / 73 / 69 / 53
1+ Level 6 / 4 / 4 / 2 / 1 / 1 / 2 / 2 / 6 / 44 / 43 / 50 / 80 / 78 / 55 / 54 / 40
3+ Level 6 / 5 / 4 / 2 / 1 / 3 / 5 / 1 / 2 / 28 / 29 / 40 / 50 / 33 / 27 / 46 / 40
5+ Level 6 / 5 / 3 / 4 / 4 / 7 / 4 / 3 / 5 / 17 / 21 / 20 / 20 / 11 / 18 / 23 / 20
Female Candidates
NCD / Percentage03-05 / 04-06 / 05-07 / 06-08 / 07-09 / 08-10 / 09-11 / 10-12 / 03-05 / 04-06 / 05-07 / 06-08 / 07-09 / 08-10 / 09-11 / 10-12
Eng & Maths / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 7 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 94
5+ Level 3 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 6 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 94
5+ Level 4 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 2 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 94
5+ Level 5 / 3 / 2 / 1 / 1 / 1 / 1 / 1 / 1 / 63 / 71 / 75 / 76 / 73 / 79 / 83 / 88
1+ Level 6 / 7 / 2 / 1 / 1 / 1 / 1 / 1 / 1 / 44 / 65 / 70 / 82 / 73 / 71 / 75 / 76
3+ Level 6 / 4 / 3 / 2 / 1 / 1 / 2 / 2 / 2 / 38 / 41 / 45 / 53 / 53 / 50 / 50 / 53
5+ Level 6 / 8 / 5 / 4 / 3 / 6 / 10 / 10 / 6 / 13 / 24 / 25 / 29 / 20 / 7 / 8 / 24
5 or more awards at SCQF Level 5 or better by the end of S4
All Candidates
Attainment by the end of S4 in 2012 was well below the national pattern. The 2012 value is the second lowest since 2001.
Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.
Boys
Attainment by the end of S4 in 2012 was well below the national pattern. The 2012 value is the second lowest since 0.
Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.
Girls
Attainment by the end of S4 in 2012 was below the national pattern and in most previous years was above the national pattern. The 2012 value is ranked 10th out of 12 years. NCD values indicate that the 2012 value for this measure is notably better than the corresponding value for All Candidates.
Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.
All Candidates / Male Candidates / Female Candidates2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012
% / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / %
School
Comp Ave / 56 / 53 / 55 / 55 / 56 / 51 / 49 / 49 / 50 / 52 / 60 / 57 / 60 / 60 / 61
Authority / 37 / 36 / 39 / 37 / 41 / 32 / 33 / 32 / 34 / 35 / 41 / 40 / 47 / 40 / 47
There are no PCA data for this school. Comparator schools have been selected using Free Meal Entitlement.
The boxplot above shows the distribution of scores of a group of 20 comparator schools, selected using Free Meal Entitlement (FME). The line above the box extends up to the highest value achieved in the group of schools and the line below the box extends down to the lowest value achieved. The box represents the scores between the lower and upper quartiles (ie 50% of the group, and the central line indicates the position of the median score (the average of the 10th and 11th scores). The special characters indicate the value achieved by Tiree High.
Note that there are fewer than 10 schools with percentage FME greater than Tiree High. This means that attainment levels can normally be expected to be below the median level indicated by the horizontal line across the box.
5 or more awards at SCQF Level 4 or better by the end of S4
All Candidates
Attainment by the end of S4 in 2012 was well below the national pattern and in all previous years was above the national pattern. The 2012 value is the lowest since 2001.
Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.
Boys
Attainment by the end of S4 in 2012 was well below the national pattern. The 2012 value is the second lowest since 0.
Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.
Girls
Attainment by the end of S4 in 2012 was well below the national pattern and in all previous years was well above the national pattern. The 2012 value is the lowest since 2001.
Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.
All Candidates / Male Candidates / Female Candidates2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012
% / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / %
School
Comp Ave / 90 / 91 / 90 / 90 / 91 / 89 / 90 / 88 / 88 / 89 / 91 / 92 / 92 / 92 / 93
Authority / 84 / 81 / 84 / 79 / 81 / 81 / 78 / 80 / 77 / 78 / 87 / 84 / 89 / 81 / 85
5 or more awards at SCQF Level 3 or better by the end of S4
All Candidates
Attainment by the end of S4 in 2012 and in most previous years was well above the national pattern. The 2012 value is the highest since 2001. NCD values indicate that the 2012 value for this measure is notably better than the value for 5+Level5. The value for this measure has increased each year since 2010.
Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.
Boys
Attainment by the end of S4 in 2012 and in most previous years was well above the national pattern. The 2012 value is the highest since 2001. The value for this measure has increased each year since 2001.
Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.
Girls
Attainment by the end of S4 in 2012 and in most previous years was well above the national pattern. The 2012 value is the highest since 2001. The value for this measure has increased each year since 2010.
Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.
All Candidates / Male Candidates / Female Candidates2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012
% / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / %
School
Comp Ave / 97 / 97 / 97 / 97 / 97 / 97 / 96 / 97 / 97 / 96 / 97 / 97 / 98 / 97 / 98
Authority / 94 / 92 / 94 / 92 / 95 / 93 / 91 / 93 / 92 / 94 / 95 / 93 / 95 / 92 / 95
English and Maths award at SCQF Level 3 or better by the end of S4
All Candidates
Attainment by the end of S4 in 2012 and in most previous years was well below the national pattern. The 2012 value is the lowest since 2001.
Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.
Boys
Attainment by the end of S4 in 2012 was well below the national pattern and in most previous years was well above the national pattern. The 2012 value is the second lowest since 0.
Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.
Girls
Attainment by the end of S4 in 2012 and in most previous years was well above the national pattern. The 2012 value is the highest since 2001. NCD values indicate that the 2012 value for this measure is notably better than the corresponding value for All Candidates. The value for this measure has increased each year since 2010.
Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.
All Candidates / Male Candidates / Female Candidates2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012
% / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / %
School
Comp Ave / 97 / 98 / 98 / 98 / 98 / 97 / 98 / 98 / 98 / 97 / 97 / 98 / 99 / 98 / 98
Authority / 95 / 92 / 93 / 88 / 88 / 94 / 91 / 93 / 87 / 86 / 96 / 93 / 93 / 89 / 91
Eng Lev 3 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 93 / 8 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 90 / 9 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100
Maths Lev 3 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 93 / 8 / 100 / 100 / 71 / 10 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 50 / 10 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 90 / 9 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100
5 or more awards at SCQF Level 6 or better by the end of S5
All Candidates
Attainment by the end of S5 in 2012 was well above the national pattern and in most previous years was above the national pattern. The 2012 value is the highest since 2001. NCD values indicate that the 2012 value for this measure is in line with expectations based on the value for 5+Level5 by the end of S4 in 2011.
Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.
Boys
Attainment by the end of S5 in 2012 and in most previous years was well above the national pattern. The 2012 value is the highest since 2001.
Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.
Girls
Attainment by the end of S5 in 2012 and in most previous years was well above the national pattern. The 2012 value is the highest since 2001. The value for this measure has increased each year since 2005.
Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.
All Candidates / Male Candidates / Female Candidates2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012
% / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / %
School
Comp Ave / 22 / 22 / 22 / 24 / 25 / 20 / 20 / 19 / 22 / 23 / 25 / 24 / 26 / 26 / 28
Authority / 10 / 10 / 9 / 13 / 10 / 7 / 8 / 8 / 12 / 9 / 14 / 11 / 9 / 14 / 12
3 or more awards at SCQF Level 6 or better by the end of S5
All Candidates
Attainment by the end of S5 in 2012 was well above the national pattern. The 2012 value is the second highest since 2001. NCD values indicate that the 2012 value for this measure is in line with expectations based on the value for 5+Level5 by the end of S4 in 2011.
Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.
Boys
Attainment by the end of S5 in 2012 was well above the national pattern. The 2012 value is the second highest since 2010.
Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.
Girls
Attainment by the end of S5 in 2012 was well above the national pattern. The 2012 value is ranked 3th out of 12 years.
Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.
All Candidates / Male Candidates / Female Candidates2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012
% / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / %
School
Comp Ave / 41 / 42 / 41 / 44 / 45 / 37 / 39 / 37 / 40 / 40 / 44 / 46 / 46 / 48 / 50
Authority / 25 / 24 / 24 / 27 / 24 / 19 / 19 / 20 / 23 / 21 / 30 / 28 / 27 / 32 / 27
1 or more awards at SCQF Level 6 or better by the end of S5
All Candidates
Attainment by the end of S5 in 2012 was above the national pattern. The 2012 value is ranked 6th out of 12 years. NCD values indicate that the 2012 value for this measure is in line with expectations based on the value for 5+Level5 by the end of S4 in 2011.
Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.
Boys
Attainment by the end of S5 in 2012 was above the national pattern. The 2012 value is ranked 4th out of 12 years.
Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.
Girls
Attainment by the end of S5 in 2012 was in line with the national pattern. The 2012 value is ranked 9th out of 12 years. The value for this measure has decreased each year since 2010.
Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.
All Candidates / Male Candidates / Female Candidates2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012
% / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / %
School
Comp Ave / 58 / 60 / 62 / 62 / 64 / 53 / 55 / 59 / 57 / 59 / 64 / 65 / 65 / 67 / 71
Authority / 45 / 46 / 48 / 49 / 45 / 38 / 41 / 42 / 42 / 41 / 53 / 51 / 53 / 57 / 49
5 or more awards at SCQF Level 5 or better by the end of S5
All Candidates
Attainment by the end of S5 in 2012 was well above the national pattern. The 2012 value is ranked 4th out of 12 years. NCD values indicate that the 2012 value for this measure is in line with expectations based on the value for 5+Level5 by the end of S4 in 2011.
Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.
Boys
Attainment by the end of S5 in 2012 was above the national pattern. The 2012 value is ranked 5th out of 12 years. NCD values indicate that the 2012 value for this measure is notably weaker than the corresponding value for All Candidates.
Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.
Girls
Attainment by the end of S5 in 2012 was well above the national pattern. The 2012 value is the highest since 2001.
Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.
All Candidates / Male Candidates / Female Candidates2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011 / 2012
% / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / % / %
School
Comp Ave / 65 / 67 / 68 / 69 / 70 / 61 / 62 / 65 / 64 / 65 / 70 / 72 / 72 / 74 / 75
Authority / 52 / 51 / 53 / 56 / 53 / 45 / 47 / 48 / 48 / 49 / 58 / 56 / 58 / 65 / 58
1 or more awards at SCQF Level 7 or better by the end of S6
All Candidates
Attainment by the end of S6 in 2012 was well above the national pattern. The 2012 value is the highest since 2001. NCD values indicate that the 2012 value for this measure is in line with expectations based on the value for 5+Level5 by the end of S4 in 2010. The value for this measure has increased each year since 2009.
Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.
Boys
Attainment by the end of S6 in 2012 was well below the national pattern and in all previous years was above the national pattern. The 2012 value is ranked 5th out of 12 years. NCD values indicate that the 2012 value for this measure is notably weaker than the corresponding value for All Candidates. The value for this measure has decreased each year since 2010.