JDBV
Inception 2 Iteration Assessment
Version <0.1>
[Note: The following template is provided for use with the Rational Unified Process. Text enclosed in square brackets and displayed in blue italics (style=InfoBlue) is included to provide guidance to the author and should be deleted before publishing the document. A paragraph entered following this style will automatically be set to normal (style=Body Text).]
[To customize automatic fields in Microsoft Word (which display a gray background when selected), select File>Properties and replace the Title, Subject and Company fields with the appropriate information for this document. After closing the dialog, automatic fields may be updated throughout the document by selecting Edit>Select All (or Ctrl-A) and pressing F9, or simply click on the field and press F9. This must be done separately for Headers and Footers. Alt-F9 will toggle between displaying the field names and the field contents. See Word help for more information on working with fields.]
JDBV / Version: <1.0>Inception 2 Iteration Assessment / Date: <29/Oct/02>
<document identifier>
Revision History
Date / Version / Description / Author29/Oct/02 / <0.1> / Initial version. / Brian Sidharta
Table of Contents
1.Introduction
1.1Purpose
1.2Scope
1.3Definitions, Acronyms, and Abbreviations
1.4References
2.Iteration Objectives Reached
3.Adherence to Plan
4.Use Cases and Scenarios Implemented
Inception 2 Iteration Assessment
1.Introduction
[The introduction of the Iteration Assessment provides an overview of the entire document. It includes the purpose, scope, definitions, acronyms, abbreviations, references, and overview of this Iteration Assessment.]
1.1Purpose
The purpose of the Iteration Assessment is to capture the result of the iteration, the degree to which the evaluation criteria were met, lessons learned and changes to be done.
[Specify the purpose of this Iteration Assessment.]
1.2Scope
This iteration assessment applies to the second Inception phase. The second Inception iteration developed the initial requirements.
[A brief description of the scope of this Iteration Assessment; what Project(s) it is associated with and anything else that is affected or influenced by this document.]
1.3Definitions, Acronyms, and Abbreviations
See the dbViZ Glossary.
[This subsection provides the definitions of all terms, acronyms, and abbreviations required to properly interpret the Iteration Assessment. This information may be provided by reference to the project’s Glossary.]
1.4References
- dbViZ Vision
- dbViZ Risk List
- dbViZ Inception 2 Iteration Plan
- dbViZ Software Development Plan
- dbViZ Use Case Model
- Use Case Specification - Import Schema
[This subsection provides a complete list of all documents referenced elsewhere in the Iteration Assessment. Identify each document by title, report number (if applicable), date, and publishing organization. Specify the sources from which the references can be obtained. This information may be provided by reference to an appendix or to another document.]
2.Iteration Objectives Reached
Most artifacts that were scheduled to be completed have been written. However, none have been reviewed.
[Acknowledge the success you reached in the iteration.]
3.Adherence to Plan
The iteration went somewhat to plan, suffering primarily from a time delay.
[How did the iteration run according to plan? How well was the budget met?]
4.Use Cases and Scenarios Implemented
An initial version of the Import Schema Use Case has been written.
[List the use cases and scenarios that were implemented.]
Confidential / <Company Name>, 2018 / Page 1 of 4