Highway Traffic Act - R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 619 s3

Highway Traffic Act
Code de la route

R.R.O. 1990, REGULATION 619

Amended to O.Reg. 117/06

SPEED LIMITS

Historical version for the period April 19, 2006 to May 3, 2006.

This Regulation is made in English only.

1.The speed limit on those parts of the King’s Highway described in,

(a) Part 1 of each Schedule is prescribed as 100 kilometres per hour;

(b) Part 2 of each Schedule is prescribed as 90 kilometres per hour;

(d) Part 4 of each Schedule is prescribed as 70 kilometres per hour;

(e) Part 5 of each Schedule is prescribed as 60 kilometres per hour;

(f) Part 6 of each Schedule is prescribed as 50 kilometres per hour. R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 619, s.1.

2.Despite section 1, the speed limit on those parts of the King’s Highway that are within truck inspection stations established and maintained by the Ministry is prescribed as 40 kilometres per hour. R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 619, s.2.

3.Where a highway is referred to in a Schedule by a number or name, the reference is to that part of the King’s Highway that is known thereby. R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 619, s.3.

4.(1)In a Schedule,

“township”, when used with reference to a township in a territorial district, means a geographic township, except where otherwise provided. R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 619, s.4(1).

(2)Where a part of the King’s Highway is referred to in a Schedule as being in a municipality that, by reason of a municipal reorganization, has become another municipality or a part thereof, the reference shall be deemed to be a reference to that part of the King’s Highway in that other municipality or part thereof. R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 619, s.4(2).

5.No person shall operate a commercial motor vehicle, except a bus, at a greater rate of speed than 50 kilometres per hour, northbound, on that part of the King’s Highway known as No. 20 in The Regional Municipality of Hamilton-Wentworth lying between a point situate at its intersection with the southerly limit of the roadway known as King Street in the City of Hamilton and a point situate 45 metres measured southerly from its intersection with the northerly limit of the roadway known as Green Mountain Road in the Town of Stoney Creek. R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 619, s.5.

6.Revoked: O.Reg. 442/00, s.1.

7.(1)Despite paragraph 8 of Part 3 of Schedule 53, no person shall operate a motor vehicle at a greater rate of speed than 60 kilometres per hour on days during which school is regularly held between the hours of 7:15 a.m. to 8:15 a.m. and 2:15 p.m. to 3:15 p.m. on that part of the King’s Highway known as No. 48 in the Town of Georgina in The Regional Municipality of York beginning at a point situate 105 metres measured westerly from its intersection with the westerly limit of the roadway known as Weir’s Road and extending westerly for a distance of 750 metres. O.Reg. 140/97, s.1.

(2)Despite paragraph 9 of Part 3 of Schedule 2, no person shall operate a motor vehicle at a greater rate of speed than 60 kilometres per hour on days during which school is regularly held between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. on that part of the King’s Highway known as No. 3 in the Township of Malahide, in the County of Elgin, beginning at a point situate 100 metres measured easterly from its intersection with the centre line of the roadway known as County Road 40 (Springfield Road) and extending westerly for a distance of 750 metres. O.Reg. 443/98, s.1.

(3)Despite paragraph 13 of Part 3 of Schedule 16, no person shall operate a motor vehicle at a greater rate of speed than 60 kilometres per hour on days during which school is regularly held between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 2:45 p.m. to 3:45 p.m. on that part of the King’s Highway known as No. 12 and No. 48 in the Township of Brock in the Regional Municipality of Durham beginning at a point situate 199 metres measured northerly from its intersection with the centre line of the roadway known as Beaver Avenue and extending northerly for a distance of 750 metres. O.Reg. 255/99, s.1.

(4)Despite paragraph 10 of Part 3 of Schedule 53, no person shall operate a motor vehicle at a greater rate of speed than 60 kilometres per hour on days during which school is regularly held between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 2:45 p.m. to 3:45 p.m. on that part of the King’s Highway known as No. 12 and No. 48 in the Township of Brock in the Regional Municipality of Durham beginning at a point situate 199 metres measured northerly from its intersection with the centre line of the roadway known as Beaver Avenue and extending northerly for a distance of 750 metres. O.Reg. 255/99, s.1.

(5)Despite paragraph 1 of Part 3 of Schedule 11, no person shall operate a motor vehicle at a greater rate of speed than 60 kilometres per hour on days during which school is regularly held, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., 12:25 p.m. to 1:25 p.m. and 3:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m., on that part of the King’s Highway known as No. 9 in the Town of Orangeville in the County of Dufferin beginning at a point situate 300 metres measured westerly from its intersection with the centre line of the roadway known as Rolling Hills Drive and extending easterly for a distance of 700 metres. O.Reg. 473/05, s.1.

Schedule 1

HIGHWAY NO. 2

Part 1

(Reserved)

Part 2

(Reserved)

Part 3

Essex — Twp. of Rochester

1. That part of the King’s Highway known as No. 2 in the Township of Rochester in the County of Essex lying between a point situate 290 metres measured westerly from its intersection with the centre line of the west junction of the roadway known as Essex County Road 31 in the hamlet of St. Joachim and a point situate 100 metres measured westerly from its intersection with the centre line of the bridge over Duck Creek.

Kent — City of Chatham, Town of Tilbury

2. That part of the King’s Highway known as No. 2 in the County of Kent lying between a point situate 590 metres measured westerly from its intersection with the centre line of the roadway known as Bloomfield Sideroad in the City of Chatham and a point situate 40 metres measured easterly from its intersection with the centre line of the roadway known as Tilbury Street in the Town of Tilbury.

Kent — Twp. of Chatham

3. That part of the King’s Highway known as No. 2 in the Township of Chatham in the County of Kent lying between a point situate 365 metres measured westerly from its intersection with the centre line of the roadway known as Kent County Road No. 15 in the hamlet of Kent Bridge and a point situate 335 metres measured easterly from its intersection with the centre line of the roadway known as Arkwood Road in the hamlet of Louisville.

Kent — Twp. of Camden, Village of Thamesville

4. That part of the King’s Highway known as No. 2 in the Township of Camden in the County of Kent lying between a point situate 700 metres measured westerly from its intersection with the centre line of the roadway known as Priscilla Street in the Village of Thamesville and a point situate 185 metres measured easterly from its intersection with the centre line of the roadway known as Kent County Road No. 15 in the hamlet of Kent Bridge.

Middlesex — Village of Wardsville
Kent — Village of Thamesville

5. That part of the King’s Highway known as No. 2 lying between a point situate 360 metres measured westerly from its intersection with the centre line of the roadway known as Middlesex County Road No. 1 (Hagerty Street) in the Village of Wardsville in the County of Middlesex and a point situate 805 metres measured easterly from its intersection with the centre line of the Canadian National Railway right-of-way in the Village of Thamesville in the County of Kent.

Middlesex — Villages of Melbourne and Wardsville

6. That part of the King’s Highway known as No. 2 lying between a point situate 915 metres measured westerly from its intersection with the centre line of the roadway known as Middlesex County Road No. 9 (Union Street) in the Village of Melbourne and a point situate 150 metres measured easterly from its intersection with the centre line of the roadway known as Mill Lane in the Village of Wardsville.

Middlesex — Twp. of Caradoc, Village of Melbourne

7. That part of the King’s Highway known as No. 2 in the Township of Caradoc in the County of Middlesex lying between a point situate 115 metres measured westerly from its intersection with the centre line of the King’s Highway known as No. 81 and a point situate 732 metres measured easterly from its intersection with the centre line of the roadway known as Middlesex County Road No. 9 (Union Street) in the Village of Melbourne.

Oxford — Twps. of Blandford-Blenheim and Norwich
Brant — Twp. of Burford

8. That part of the King’s Highway known as No. 2 in the Township of Blandford-Blenheim and the Township of Norwich in the County of Oxford lying between a point situate 240 metres measured easterly from its intersection with the centre line of the roadway known as Oxford County Road No. 4 and a point situate 680 metres measured westerly from its intersection with the centre line of the roadway known as Brant County Road No. 25 in the Township of Burford in the County of Brant.

Oxford — Twp. of Blandford-Blenheim
Brant — Twps. of Burford and Brantford

9. That part of the King’s Highway known as No. 2 in the Township of Blandford-Blenheim in the County of Oxford and in the Township of Burford in the County of Brant lying between a point situate 85 metres measured easterly from its intersection with the centre line of the roadway known as Brant County Road 25 and a point situate 500 metres measured westerly from its intersection with the centre line of the roadway known as Brant County Road 16 in the Township of Brantford in the County of Brant.

Brant — Twp. of Brantford

10. That part of the King’s Highway known as No. 2 in the Township of Brantford in the County of Brant lying between a point situate 155 metres measured easterly from its intersection with the centre line of the roadway known as Brant County Road 16 and a point situate 290 metres measured westerly from the easterly limit of its intersection with the King’s Highway known as No. 24.

11. Revoked: O.Reg. 194/97, s.1.

12. Revoked: O.Reg. 206/98, s.1(1).

13. Revoked: O.Reg. 206/98, s.1(1).

14. Revoked: O.Reg. 206/98, s.1(1).

15. Revoked: O.Reg. 206/98, s.1(1).

Oxford and Middlesex — City of London

16. That part of the King’s Highway known as No. 2 lying between a point situate 160 metres measured easterly from its intersection with the centre line of the roadway known as Banner Road in the hamlet of Thamesford in the County of Oxford and a point situate 280 metres measured easterly from its intersection with the centre line of the roadway known as West Nissouri Township Concession 1 in the City of London, formerly in the Township of West Nissouri, in the County of Middlesex.

Essex — Twps. of Maidstone and Sandwich South

17. That part of the King’s Highway known as No. 2 in the County of Essex lying between a point situate 190 metres measured westerly from its intersection with the centre line of the roadway known as West Puce River Road in the hamlet of Puce in the Township of Maidstone and a point situate at its intersection with the westerly limit of the roadway known as Banwell Road in the Township of Sandwich South.

18. Revoked: O.Reg. 206/98, s.1(1).

Lennox and Addington — Twp. of Ernestown

19. That part of the King’s Highway known as No. 2 in the Township of Ernestown in the County of Lennox and Addington lying between a point situate 1500 feet measured westerly from its intersection with the westerly limit of the roadway known as Cross Street in the hamlet of Odessa and a point situate 2500 feet measured westerly from its intersection with the line between the townships of Ernestown and North Fredericksburgh.

Lennox and Addington — Twp. of Richmond

20. That part of the King’s Highway known as No. 2 in the Township of Richmond in the County of Lennox and Addington lying between a point situate at its intersection with the westerly limit of the roadway known as Russell Street and a point situate 1300 feet measured easterly from its intersection with the line between the counties of Lennox and Addington and Hastings.

Brant — Twp. of Brantford

21. That part of the King’s Highway known as No. 2 in the Township of Brantford in the County of Brant lying between a point situate 565 metres measured easterly from its intersection with the southerly limit of the King’s Highway known as No. 5 and a point situate 225 metres measured westerly from its intersection with the easterly limit of the overpass structure of the King’s Highway known as No. 403.

Regional Municipality of Durham — Town of Ajax,
Town of Whitby

22. That part of the King’s Highway known as No. 2 in The Regional Municipality of Durham lying between a point situate 615 metres measured easterly from its intersection with the easterly limit of the roadway known as Durham Regional Road No. 44 in the Town of Ajax and a point situate 1085 metres measured easterly from its intersection with the easterly limit of the roadway known as Durham Regional Road No. 23 in the Town of Whitby.

Regional Municipality of Durham — Municipality of Clarington

23. That part of the King’s Highway known as No. 2 in the Municipality of Clarington in The Regional Municipality of Durham lying between a point situate 1250 metres measured easterly from its intersection with the easterly limit of the roadway known as Durham Regional Road No. 14 and a point situate 1220 metres measured westerly from its intersection with the easterly limit of the roadway known as Durham Regional Road No. 17.