API 17O HIPPS
STATUS REPORT
API C2 / SC 17SUBCOMMITTEE ON SUBSEA PRODUCTION SYSTEMS
API 17O HIPPS
TASK GROUP STATUS
JANUARYANUARYUNE 201321
API 17O HIPPS
STATUS REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. introduction 1-1
2. previous reported status 2-1
3. membership 3-2
4. uPDATED TARGET DATES FOR DELIVERABLES 4-3
5. MAJOR ISSUES 5-3
6. anticIpAted new work items 6-3
7. plans for future meetings 7-3
8. RESOURCE NEEDS 8-3
1. introduction 1-1
2. previous reported status 2-1
membership 2-1
3. uPDATED TARGET DATES FOR DELIVERABLES 3-2
4. 4-2
5. MAJOR ISSUES 5-2
6. anticIpAted new work items 6-2
7. plans for future meetings 7-3
8. Export pipeline hipps application 8-3
9. RESOURCE NEEDS 9-4
-2- 16-January anuaryune-2013209
API 17O HIPPS
STATUS REPORT
1. introduction
The API 17O task group’s scope of work is to maintain the recommended practice for High Integrity Pressure Protections Systems (HIPPS) for subsea production systems. This scope has been extended to cover applications for export pipelines in a new sub-committee, it is intended that export pipeline HIPPS will be covered under a different specification.
2. previous reported status
The RP was published in October 2009.
The latest draft was re-balloted with the ballot closing in May 2012. The ballot passed with 2 negative votes and a total of 73 comments. The document has now been updated with comments incorporated and working to gain agreement with negative voters. Plan to circulate comments or re-ballot 1Q 2013.
3. membership
Membership to the task group has grown with a large industry involvement.
The working group is made up of the following members.
TABLE 3-1: API 17O Task Group Members -MEMBERS - HOUSTON
Name / Company / E-mail /Allen Verret / Murphy /
Baha Tanju / Chevron /
Brian Perilloux / Williams /
Brian Skeels / FMC /
Bruce Davidson / J P Kenny /
Christy LanBohannon / BSEEMMS /
Craig Lamison / KBR /
Crispin Richards / Shell /
Christopher Curran / BP /
Tim Dean / Anadarko /
Francois Delille / J P Kenny /
Don Ogwude / CSI /
Eivind Koren / StatoilHydro /
Frank Torres / Aker Kvaerner /
Gary Harrison / BP /
Horst Moll / Aker Kvaerner /
Teguh Inarsoyo / BP /
James Waithman / Nexen /
James Wilkirson / Cameron /
Jay Hursh / Aker Kvaerner /
Jim Chase / Intec /
Jim Metzinger / Technip /
Jim Riley / Chevron /
John Allen / GE Vetco /
John Bodine / Chevron /
Kevin Keosof / Chevron /
Lewis Holmes / FMC /
Loc Hoang / Cameron /
Manny Gagliano / MMS /
Mark Marsalis / Drilquip /
Mendel Nock / Chevron /
Nancy Chafe / J P Kenny /
Rajam Murthy / Chevron /
Shyam Patel / BP /
Paul Shepherd / AMEC /
Peter Lovie / Devon /
Raj Balene / Intec /
Richard Barratt / GE Vetco /
Rod Hope / Stress Subsea /
Roger Bergman / Chevron /
Mark Ezekiel / BP /
Tim Powell / Devon /
William Taggart / Murphy /
Tom Pagel / Dril-Quip /
Ben Seymour / Hess /
4. uPDATED TARGET DATES FOR DELIVERABLES
TABLE 4-1: milestone target dates
Milestone Targets / Completion DateRP published / October 2009
Review the base 17-O RP for applicability to export pipelines and identify areas of concern / Completed
Invite additional expertise to join the committee…include PHMSA/DOT / Completed
Set boundaries to establish the breadth of acceptable deviations from the base 17-O RP / Completed
Develop mission statement and develop a scope statement for the continuing Export Annex / June 2010Completed
Revision of Section 9 completedSubmittal to API review panel / September 2011JuneDecember 20112012
API Ballot completedSubmittal to API review panel (Export pipelines) / MayDecember 2012
Review ballot and address issues / September 2012
Updated draft / December 2012
Issue updated draft or re-ballot / 1Q 2013
5. MAJOR ISSUES
The Equation 2 of section 9 of the RP has been found to be dimensionally inconsistent. API has contracted the services of a SIS specialist from ABB to review the issue and propose amendments for review by the working group.
Section 9 has been redrafted and reviewed by the working group. All comments received by the November deadline have been reviewed. The revised Section 9 will be submitted to ISO as part of the DIS commenting round.Revised document (mostly section 9 update) was submitted for ballot. A total of 73 comments received.
Total Responses 23
Total Ballots 26
Response Rate 88% (must be > 50%)
Approval Rate 89% (must be > 67%)
CONSENSUS YES
The committee is dividing into a smaller working group with a larger reading group. The working group is planning to meet in June 2012 to review comments and agree changes. These will then be sent to the larger reading group for further comment. Depending on the level of comment the document will then be either re-issued or submitted for a re-ballot.
6. anticIpAted new work items
Review comments from the ballot and agree changes. Depending on level of changes may require to be re-balloted. None.Working to develop export pipeline annex.
7. plans for future meetings
8. Next meeting will be in late June 2012.one
9. Export pipeline hipps application
There is an ongoing monthly meeting to develop and work on the export pipeline annex. This work is being lead by Brian Perilloux (Williams)
We have developed a mission statement and identified objectives and boundaries for drafting an API standard/RP/specification that will address the necessary system components to enable a subsea pressure class specification break. We are awaiting an official designation (title) from API, but we continue to progress the content of the draft through monthly meetings hosted by Williams Midstream in Houston. The DOI (BOEM) and PHMSA (DOT) have committed to continue their attendance and input during the development of the document. Our goal is to complete a draft during the next year suitable for API review by YE 2012. Brian Perilloux (Williams) will continue to lead the effort with assistance from Mark Cizek (Williams). We expect continuing regular participation by representatives of operating companies, equipment suppliers and the regulatory agencies. However, we have currently postponed the monthly meetings until such time that more representatives from industry and the regulatory agencies can resume attendance. We expect to resume the monthly meeting in the 1st quarter 2012.
When published, this will be a separate document and not part of API 17O.
TABLE 3-2: EXPORT PIPELINE Task Group MEMBERS - HOUSTON
Name / Company / E-mail /Alex Alvarado / BSEE /
Barrie Parker / Oil States /
Christopher Curran / BP /
Christy Lan / BSEE /
Craig Lamison / KBR /
Don Ogwude / CSI /
David Keffer / Petrovalves /
Enrico Sanguineti / ATV /
Euthymios Jose Euthymiou / Petrobras /
Forner Giovanni / Petrovalves /
Gualtiero Castelli / Petrovalves /
Herc Sanchez / Chevron /
Ian Hardy / Cameron /
J Abattisti / Marathon /
Jim Metzinger / Technip /
Joe Sieve / DOT /
Jose Bacaandrade / ExxonMobil /
Khalid Mateen / Total /
Dominique Larrey / Total /
Lewis Holmes / FMC /
Loc Hoang / Cameron /
Lon Ngo / Dril-Quip /
Manny Gagliano / JPKenny /
Mark Marsalis / JPKenny /
Martyn Barnsley / Petrovalves /
Mike Dupre / Shell /
Mike Meier / Subsea Offshore /
Mike Stark / Eprod /
Nancy Chafe / JPKenny /
Paul Barnett / Epco /
Brian Perilloux / Williams /
Pushpal Kahari / Dril-Quip /
Rick Faircloth / Cameron /
Ryan Chladek / ExxonMobil /
There is an ongoing monthly meeting to develop and work on the export pipeline annex. This work is being lead by Brian Perilloux (Williams)
We have developed a mission statement and identified objectives and boundaries for drafting an API standard/RP/specification that will address the necessary system components to enable a subsea pressure class specification break. We are awaiting an official designation (title) from API, but we continue to progress the content of the draft through monthly meetings hosted by Williams Midstream in Houston. The DOI (MMS) and PHMSA (DOT) have committed to continue their attendance and input during the development of the document. Our goal is to complete a draft during the next year suitable for API review by YE 20112012. Brian Perilloux (Williams) will continue to lead the effort with assistance from Mark Cizek (Williams). We expect continuing regular participation by representatives of operating companies, equipment suppliers and the regulatory agencies. However, we have currently postponed the monthly meetings until such time that more representatives from industry and the regulatory agencies can resume attendance. We expect to resume the monthly meeting in the 4th quarter 2011.
10. RESOURCE NEEDS
NoneABB Consultant to provide input to Section 9.
-2- 16-January anuaryune-2013209