Fig. A Total number of reported natural disasters between 1900 and 2015
Source: Authors’ computation from EM-DAT: OFDA/CRED International Disaster
Database-
Fig. BTotal affected persons by reported natural disasters between 1960 and 2015
Source: Authors’ computation from EM-DAT: OFDA/CRED International Disaster
Database-
Table A Summary of the effects of floods disasters in Amhara region in 2015
Region / District / Affected / Damaged crop land (ha) / No of livestock affectedKebele / Households / Population
South Gondar / Fogera / 6 / 2,148 / 9,370 / 2,327 / 15,676
Libokemkem / 8 / 5,959 / 29,795 / 3,966 / 16,861
Dera / 4 / 3,133 / 17,721 / 2,671 / 9,971
North Gondar / Dembia / 9 / 8,151 / 35,574 / 6,348 / 14,491
Quara / 8 / 6,078 / 8,300 / 5,460 / 15,225
West Gojam / Bahirdar Zuria / 2 / 374 / 1,838 / 320 / 9,500
Mecha / 1 / 356 / 1,780 / 227 / 10,000
Achefer / 2 / 774 / 3,870 / 900 / 29,521
North Wollo / Kobo / 3 / 403 / 2,288 / 306 / 8,250
North Shoa / Antsokia / 11 / 961 / 4,137 / 326 / 6,375
Oromia / Dewa Cheffa / 1 / 610 / 2,074 / 338 / 17,175
Artuma Fursi / 1 / 105 / 525 / 105 / 22,985
Jilie Tumuga / 1 / 96 / 480 / 24 / 6,470
Kemisie town / 1 / 1,064 / 5,137 / 1,070 / 1,000
Total / 58 / 30, 212 / 122, 889 / 24,388 / 183,500
Source: Amhara region flood assessment unpublished report (2015)
Source: Authors’ own construction from household survey (April 2015)
Source: Authors’ own construction from household survey (April 2015)
Source: Authors’ own construction from household survey (April 2015)
Source: Authors’ own construction from household survey (April 2015)
Source: Authors’ own construction from household survey (April 2015)
Source: Authors’ own construction from household survey (April 2015)
Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) test for Multicollinearity OLS
Variable / VIF / 1/VIFSupply of labor / 2.45 / 0.407521
Household size / 2.18 / 0.459697
Age / 2.15 / 0.465401
Educational status / 1.76 / 0.569683
Land size / 1.68 / 0.595152
Incidence of illness / 1.29 / 0.772789
Social networks / 1.24 / 0.805932
Availability of farm oxen / 1.12 / 0.889755
Trade / 1.12 / 0.896644
Sex of household head / 1.11 / 0.902897
Exposure to flood / 1.06 / 0.941827
Mean / VIF / 1.56
Omitted variable test
Ramsey RESET test using powers of the fitted values of LRI
Ho: model has no omitted variables
F(3, 199) = 0.55
Prob > F = 0.6503
Test of heteroskedasticity
Breusch-Pagan / Cook-Weisberg test for heteroskedasticity
Ho: Constant variance
Variables: fitted values of LRI
chi2(1) = 0.13
Prob > chi2 = 0.7205
Post-estimation tests for normality of residuals
(A) (B)(C) (D)
Post-estimation tests for normality of residuals
(A)Kernel density estimate of residuals
(B)Standardized normal probability plot of residuals
(C)Plot of residuals against predicted values
(D)Quintile-normal plot of residuals
Shapiro-Wilk W test for normal data
Variable / Obs. / W / V / z / Prob>zResidual / 214 / 0.99252 / 1.183 / 0.389 / 0.34877
The null hypothesis is that the distribution of the residuals is normal, here the p-value is 0.348. Thus, the null hypothesis will be accepted with the conclusion that the residuals are normally distributed.
Table Black of economic assets and access to credit and resilience status
Non-resilient / Resilient / TotalOwnership of farm oxen / 36 (80 %) / 9 (20%) / 45
Access to credit / 121(93.07%) / 9(6.92 %) / 130
Ownership of farm land / 17(100%) / 0 (0%) / 17
Source: Authors’ own construction from household survey (April 2015)