1

F.M. Chalkalis – the talented inventor

Kanaryov F.M.

The announcement. F.M. Chalkalis as he writes, has invented the multiplier of energy which transforms electric energy in mechanical with an indicator of power efficiency as he considers, in tens times more units.

Viewing impresses his Video with the evident results, but calculation of these results is, of course, erroneous. The author and his advisers did not manage to calculate correctly size of the electric energy spent for rotation of a pendulum, size of mechanical energy which generates a pendulum at rotation. Their fault in it is not present, as new laws mechanodynamics and new laws of electrodynamics yet do not send in addition to them. Therefore we will help them, using initial data of the author of experiment.

Experiment is extremely simple. Two metal spheres 45.69kg are located by a lump on distance 0.51m from a horizontal axis of rotation. To this mass the author adds mass of a frame on which spheres fasten. Mass of a frame 4.50kg. The author not reflecting, defines the moments of the forces operating on spheres and a frame, by multiplication of mass of a body, to distance from its centre of mass to a rotation axis. Multiplying the received result on frequency of rotation of a pendulum, the author finds, how he considers, power on the pendulum shaft, expressed in watts. As the mass of a frame in 10 times is less than mass of spheres we will exclude it while from calculation. Then his result taken from the text of its article, looks so [1]:

Central weight F 45.69Kg = 448,2Ν ∙ r 0.51m = 228.58Nm ∙ 160 RPM ÷ 9550 = 3.829Κw (1)

This result is true only for position of spheres during the moments when radiuses from their centres of mass to a rotation axis are located horizontally. If radiuses are vertical, the moments of a gravity operating on them, are equal to zero and its result (1) too is equal to zero. On video it is visible, that the sector with spheres rotates in regular intervals. On the basis of it kinetic energy of their uniform rotation with frequency of 160 RPM (data of the author of experiment) is equal

. (2)

As the sector with cargoes rotates in regular intervals kinetic energy of its uniform rotation is equal to numerically mechanical power of its rotation, that is mechanical power on a shaft of a rotating pendulum is equal 1.666 Kw, but not 3.829Kw as it has turned out at the author (1).

Further, the author informs, that the devices registering the expense of the electric power on rotation of two frictional disks which operated impulse on sector of an arc frame on which spheres fastened, showed size of a current and tension size Multiplying them, the author receives the power realised on a drive of a pendulum.

. (3)

As frictional disks operate on the sector keeping spheres, periodically, those for correct definition of electric power, realised on a drive of such pendulum, it was necessary to write down the tension and current oscillogram. To define porosity of impulses of current S and the received size (3) to divide into a square of porosity of the pulse working expense of the electric power. It is visually possible to put, that the sector of fastening of spheres makes, approximately, the fifth part from 360 hailstones. As we do not have oscillogram and we do not know an expense of the electric power for electromotor idling in sector 360-60=300 we will divide while author's capacity into porosity once. Then the capacity realised on a drive of a pendulum, will be equal 408/5=81.60Вт. To it it is necessary to add the expense of the electric power on idling of the electric motor resulting frictional disks in sector 360-60=300. It will be, approximately, half of working expense, that is 80.60/2=40.30W. Then the full power realised on a drive of a sectorial pendulum, will make 80.60+40.30=120.90W.

As a result, power efficiency, the author's multiplier of energy will be equal, approximately, 1666.43/120.90=13.78. But it is theoretical efficiency. If to a pendulum shaft to connect continuous loading it can keep a mode of uniform rotation at continuous loading much more smaller initial size 1666.43W. The exact size of such loading can be defined only experimentally on its installation.

There are bases to believe, that the general power efficiency of the pendular converter of electric energy in mechanical will be more units. Certainly, if to a pendulum shaft to connect pulse loading efficiency of the multiplier of energy will increase.

THE CONCLUSION

There are bases to congratulate inventor F.M. Chalkalis from it inventor’s success and to wish their continuation.

INFORMATION SOURCES