English Enhancement Grant Scheme for Primary Schools

English Enhancement Grant Scheme for Primary Schools

English Enhancement Grant Scheme for Primary Schools

Final Report

School Name: ChunTokSchool File number: A043

A Implementation Progress

Tasks should be completed after 2 years of implementation / Completed as scheduled
(Please tick √) / Reasons for not completing the tasks as scheduled / Follow-up actions for completing the tasks as stated in the approved school plan
Yes / No
(A) Thematic Reading Programme for KS1(P.1-3)
  1. Hire IT service provider, support teachers to produce teaching resources
- Led by the English panel head and co-plan among level English teachers, develop phonics and reading resource packages containing teaching plans, worksheets and IT resources such as e-vocabulary learning packages and e-grammar practice packages that facilitate students’ thematic reading.
-Teach target phonics and reading skills through thematic reading programme.
-Design and apply different modes of assessing phonics and reading skills in class.
-Adopt a reward reading programme to encourage students to read beyond school time. Co-plan among level subject teachers, provide reading materials for students to read independently after the thematic reading lessons.
-Do adaptation and revisionduring regular co-planning and yearly evaluation. / √
- completed the framework of reading skills and phonics skills.
- generated 6 unit plans and their corresponding resources for each level.(Total : 18 unit plans with 54 texts/ stories)
- implemented the six unit plans in each level.
-assessed the outcomes in November, March and June. Revised the unit plans.
- implemented the reading programme and incorporated the extensive reading scheme in the programme.
- shared the experiences among levels in November, March and July.
- completed the frameworks of P.1-3 eVocabulary and eGrammar.
- completed P.1-3 eVocabulary IT resources & booklets. (9 levels with 16 themes)
- completed P.1-3 eGrammar. (9 units)
- students adopted eVocabulary for self-learning & teachers adopted eGrammar for teaching. / ----- / ------/ ------
Tasks scheduled for completion after the first year of implementation / Completed as scheduled
(Please tick √) / Reasons for not completing the tasks as scheduled / Resultant change of the implementation plan
Yes / No
(B) Theme-based Reading to Writing Programme for KS2(P.4-6)
  1. Hire IT service provider, support teachers to produce teaching resources
-Led by the English panel head and co-plan among level English teachers, develop reading and writing resource packages containing teaching plans, worksheets and IT resources such as e-vocabulary learning packages and e-grammar practice packages that facilitate students’ reading and writing. For the resource packages, vary the difficulty of the teaching and learning materials to cater for learner diversity
-Teach target reading and writing skills through theme-based reading and writing programme.
-Design and apply different modes of assessing reading and writing skills in class.
-Adopt a reward reading programme to encourage students to read beyond school time. Co-plan among level subject teachers, provide reading materials for students to read independently after the theme-based reading lessons.
-Do adaptation and revisionduring regular co-planning and yearly evaluation. / √
- generated 6 unit plans (P.4-5)/ 5 unit plans (P.6)and their corresponding resources for each level.(Total : 17 unit plans with 51 texts/ stories)
- varied the difficulty of the resources
- implemented all the unit plans in each level.(P.4-6)
-assessed the outcomes in November, March and June.Revised the unit plans.
- implemented the reading programme and incorporated the extensive reading scheme in the programme.
- shared the experiences among levels in November, March and July.
- completed the frameworks of P.4-6 eVocabulary and eGrammar.
- completed P.4-6 eVocabulary IT resources & booklets. (9 levels with 18 themes)
- completed P.4-6 eGrammar. (16 units)
- students adopted eVocabulary for self-learning & teachers adopted eGrammar for teaching. / ----- / ------/ ------
Tasks scheduled for completion after the first year of implementation / Completed as scheduled
(Please tick √) / Reasons for not completing the tasks as scheduled / Resultant change of the implementation plan
Yes / No
C ) Professional Development
  1. Hire a supply teacher to release all local English teachers (about 10 teachers) to
-Attend school-based professional development workshops related to the skills of curriculum planning provided by language experts.
-Attend school-based professional development workshops related to explicit teaching of phonics, reading and writing skills provided by language experts.
-Attend workshops (e.g. phonics, reading, writing) organized by different educational organizations.
-Develop and implement Thematic Reading Programme (KS1) and Theme-based Reading to Writing Programme (KS2). The materials of the school-based curriculum will be amended accordingly.
-Share the information and ideas among the levels in panel meetings after the implementation of the level reading workshops. / √
- all the English teachers attended four school-based staff development workshops “Reading Workshop – Questioning Techniques”and“eClass training-eVocabulary & eGrammar”.
- all the English teachers participated in developing and implementing the reading programme.
-all the English teachers assessed the outcomes after the implementation of the reading programme. The materials of the school-based curriculum were amended accordingly.
- all the English teachers took turns to share the experiences among levels in November, March and July. / ----- / ------/ ------

B Benefits Obtained

(Remarks: The examples below are for illustration only. Schools are strongly advised to critically review the teaching and learning of English (and where applicable, the English language environment) in their schools andevaluate the effectiveness of the enhancement measuresaccordingly.)

Evaluation Focus / Areas with improvement found / Grade level / Supporting evidence[1] / Have the effects of the measures met the school’s expectation? (Please tick √) / If the effects of the measures have not/ partly achieved the expected outcomes, what further actions would the school take?
Yes / Partly / No
Enhancing students’ performance in English language /
  1. To improve students’ phonics skills and reading skills in using a range of reading strategies in KS1
  2. To improve students’ reading skills and writing skills in using a range of reading and writing strategies that cater for learner diversity in KS2
/ B /
  1. According to the framework of the reading skills, writing skills and phonics skills, the skills descriptors of the school-based phonics and reading curriculum were developed in a coherent way.
  2. For each level, about 15-18 reading workshops were incorporated in the 5-6 unit plans of the theme-based reading programme.Each student read at least 15 texts yearly.
  3. According to the teachers’ questionnaires, all the teachers claimed that most of the students (about 80%) enjoyed reading the books of the reading workshops. The reading materials were suitable
  4. According to the teachers’ questionnaires, all the teachers claimed that most of the students (about 80%) could complete the tasks.
  5. With reference to the reading passports, the reading rate increased by 15% by comparison with last year.
  6. Comparing the first exam with the third exam, the average marks of the reading part (P.1-6) increased by 7.1%.
  7. Comparing the first exam with the third exam, the average marks of the writing part (P.4-6) increased by 4.9%.
  8. According to the exam evaluation meeting, teachers claimed that most of the students could recognize the text features and extract the main ideas. The number of students who could master the questions required higher order thinking skills increased slightly. The students could write more ideas and words in their writing.
/ √
Professional development of teachers /
  1. To develop the professional capacity of the English panel through equipping subject teachers with the strategies of curriculum planning and the teaching strategies of phonics, reading and writing
/ B /
  1. 100% of the teachers claimed that the workshops were useful.
  2. All the teachers claimed that the lesson observation and the co-planning meetings of the theme-based reading programme could help brainstorm more ideas of teaching reading and they took an active role of curriculum planning. The strategies they acquired include
  • planning the school-based curriculum: the framework of reading, writing and phonics skills, the framework of e-Vocabulary and eGrammar
  • developing resources according to learner diversity: lesson plans, tasks and teaching aids of the reading unit plans
  • teaching strategies such as shared reading, supported reading, independent reading and questioning techniques (Bloom’s Taxonomy)
  1. According to the records of the lesson observation, most of the teachers (80%) could apply the questioning techniques such as asking higher order thinking questions to provoke students’ critical thinking.
  2. All the English teachers took part in sharing the unit plans during the panel meetings. They could evaluate the outcomes of the reading programme and give useful ideas for improvement.
/ √

C Self-evaluation on the Implementation of the Measures

1. What are the focuses of the enhancement measures? (You may tick more than 1 option)

Enhancing teachers’ professional development

 Refining or developing a school based English curriculum

 Catering for learner diversity

 Strengthening the learning and teaching of English for SEN/ NAC/ NCS students

 Creating a rich English language environment

2.Please consider whether the following statement is true: (Please explain if the rating is “1” or “2”)

Yes   No
5 / 4 / 3 / 2 / 1
1. / The measures are appropriate to achieve the school-based objectives / 
2. / The school-based English curriculum developed could cater for learner diversity (if applicable) / 
3. / All the English teachers have acquired the required strategies and pedagogies (if applicable) / 
4. / Curriculum leader(s) is/are developed (if applicable) / 
5. / The deliverables produced could further help the learning and teaching of English / 
6. / The overall implementation of the measures has built up the capacity of the school for raising students’ English proficiency / 

Explanation:

DDissemination of Good Practices

1.Would you like to share the good practices with other schools? Yes  No (Please tick)

2. Please give a brief account of the good practice(s) you would like to share with other schools:

Outputs & deliverables produced / Theme-based Reading Programme
  1. Generate the framework of the reading skills
  2. Choose the books according to the theme. (various text types)
  3. Generate the lesson plans, tasksheet and teaching resources.
  4. Vary the difficulty the teaching and learning materials to cater for learner diversity.
  5. For the Whole Class Subject Teaching, the higher order thinking skills such as lateral thinking, critical thinking, problem solving, evaluation and creativity are incorporated into the reading tasks.
  6. The proper use of eResources (eVocabulary and eGrammar) and authentic reading materials in the reading workshops.

Successful experience / Catering for Learner Diversity
  1. To improve students’ reading skills and writing skills in using a range of reading and writing strategies that cater for learner diversity in KS2..
  2. To improve students’ higher order thinking skills and consolidate students’ basic language knowledge through adjusting the learning target and varying the organization of the contents.
  3. To use eVocabulary for initiating self-learning.

Signature of Principal: / Date: 1-9-2012
Name of Principal: Lai Mi-har

Please submit the completed reportwith Principal’s signature on or before30November 2012.

  1. by post (please state “EEGS” on the envelope) to SCOLARRm 1702, 17/F, SkylineTower, 39 Wang Kwong Road, Kowloon Bay, or;
  2. by faxFax No. 3184 0417, or;
  3. by

1

[1]Findings obtained from surveys/ questionnaires, analysis of students’ work, observation of their daily performance and review of their performance in formal assessments etc.