Work program review checklist — Revised July 2014
Panel code: / B45 / Subject code: / 001
School:
School code: / District:
Reviewer name: / Date: / 27/10/2018
Compiled by the Queensland Curriculum and Assessment Authority
This form is used by panellists when reviewing work programs. It can also be useful for schools to use as a checklist to ensure that all work program requirements have been met.
Instructions: Indicate Yes or No to the following statements. If your answer is No, please give specific examples of the problem in the Comments section.Course organisation
The course organisation shows: / Yes / No / Comments- The planned sequence of units that:
demonstrates the developmental nature of a four-semester course
indicates the sequence of units
- Required texts:
15–20 literary texts across the four semesters
▪at least one in-depth study of a complete novel
▪at least one in-depth study of a complete drama text
▪10–15 poems
5–10 non-literary texts across the four semesters
1–2 multimodal / digital / hypermedia texts
4–8 expository texts across the four semesters
- Organising principles — shows evidence of:
increasing complexity of challenge
range evident both across the four-semester course and within a single year
increasing independence
inclusion of cultural, social and individual differences
- Time allocation for units:
Outline of intended student learning
The scope and depth of the student learning experiences in the sample unit of work is demonstrated in: / Yes / No / Comments- Focus of the unit:
- Identification of particular objectives addressed from each of the three dimensions:
alignment between objectives and assessment opportunities
- Sequence of contextualised learning experiences:
key resources that support the learning experiences
- Brief description of the unit’s placement in the course of study
- Evidence of relevant organising principles
Assessment plan
The assessment plan indicates: / Yes / No / Comments- Assessment instruments for each unit, including conditions
- Range of assessment techniques required by the syllabus:
- Verification folio requirements for written assessment instruments have been met from these three text categories:
one imaginative text
one persuasive or reflective text suitable for a public audience
one is conducted under open conditions
two are conducted under supervised conditions
▪one is an analytical exposition in response to an unseen question based on an in-depth study of a complete literary text. Task is completed in one uninterrupted session
▪the other allows for prior notice of task but is conducted under supervised conditions (completed within five school days with no feedback on drafts)
- Verification folio requirements for spoken/signed assessment instruments have been met from two of these text categories:
an imaginative text
a persuasive or reflective text suitable for a public audience
one of these is individual
- Post-verification assessment:
- Student profile for Year 11 and for Year 12 that:
includes all assessment instruments and conditions for Years 11 and 12
indicates level of achievement for monitoring, verification and exit
indicates timing of verification
demonstrates that teaching, learning and assessment continue until the end of the course
Additional comments
Recommendation for approval
Approved / Not approvedAction to be taken:
English 2010
Work program review checklist — Revised July 2014 / Queensland Curriculum & Assessment Authority
July 2014
Page1of 3