Emerald Logistics Pty Ltd

Emerald Logistics Pty Ltd

Port Terminal Services Access Undertaking

Decision to accept

26 September 2013

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
23 Marcus Clarke Street, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, 2601

First published by the ACCC 2013

10987654321

This work is copyright. In addition to any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all material contained within this work is provided under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia license, with the exception of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms and the ACCC logos.

The details of the relevant license conditions are available on the Creative Commons website, as is the full legal code for the CC BY 3.0 AU license.

Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Director Publishing, ACCC, GPO Box 3131, Canberra ACT 2601, or .

Important notice

The information in this publication is for general guidance only. It does not constitute legal or other professional advice, and should not be relied on as a statement of the law in any jurisdiction. Because it is intended only as a general guide, it may contain generalisations. You should obtain professional advice if you have any specific concern.

The ACCC has made every reasonable effort to provide current and accurate information, but it does not make any guarantees regarding the accuracy, currency or completeness of that information.

Parties who wish to re-publish or otherwise use the information in this publication must check this information for currency and accuracy with the ACCC prior to publication. This should be done prior to each publication edition, as ACCC guidance and relevant transitional legislation frequently change. Such queries should be addressed to the Director Publishing, ACCC, GPO Box 3131, Canberra ACT 2601, or .

www.accc.gov.au

Contents

List of abbreviations and terms

Summary

1Background

1.1Process leading to the Revised Undertaking

1.2The Revised Undertaking

1.3Where to find further information

2Decision making framework

2.1Legal test for accepting an access undertaking

3ACCC reasons for decision

3.1Term

3.2The publish-negotiate-arbitrate framework

3.3Capacity management

Appendix A

List of abbreviations and terms

2011 Undertaking / The Part IIIA port terminal service undertaking submitted by Australian Bulk Alliance Pty Ltd on 21 September 2011, accepted by the ACCC on 28 September 2011.
2009 and 2011 Undertakings / Access undertakings accepted by the ACCC from Co-operative Bulk Handling Limited, GrainCorp Operations Limited and Viterra Operations Limited in 2009 and 2011. Undertakings accepted in 2011 are currently in operation and are due to expire on 30 September 2014.
ABA / Australian Bulk Alliance Pty Ltd
ACCC / Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
Cargill / Cargill Australia Limited
CBH / Co-operative Bulk Handling Limited
CCA / Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)
Client / As defined in Emerald’s proposed Indicative Access Agreement
draft revision / Draft revised version of the Proposed Undertaking provided by Emerald on 31 July 2013
Emerald / Emerald Logistics Services Pty Ltd
FCFS / ‘First come, first served’ system for allocating port terminal capacity
GrainCorp / GrainCorp Operations Limited
IAA / Emerald’s Indicative Access Agreement (Schedule 1 to the Revised Undertaking) sets out the standard terms of access to port terminal services at Melbourne Port Terminal.
MPT / Melbourne Port Terminal
Reference Prices / The standard prices charged by Emerald for port terminal services provided between 1 October 2013 and September 2014, as published by Emerald no later than 30 September 2013 and as may be varied from time to time in accordance with the Revised Undertaking.
Proposed Undertaking / The Part IIIA port terminal service access undertaking that Emerald provided to the ACCC for consideration on 26 March 2013.
Revised Undertaking / The Part IIIA port terminal service access undertaking that Emerald provided to the ACCC for consideration on 9 September 2013
SHA / Emerald’s Storage and Handling Agreement is the product of a negotiated agreement between a client and Emerald for access to port terminal services, which has different terms and conditions to the IAA.
Standard Terms / The terms contained in the Indicative Access Agreement, which provide a starting point for commercial negotiation of access to port terminal services at Melbourne Port Terminal.
Viterra / Viterra Operations Limited
WEMA / Wheat Export Marketing Act 2008 (Cth) (as amended by the Wheat Export Marketing Amendment Act 2012)

Summary

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) accepts an access undertaking from Emerald Logistics Pty Ltd (Emerald), governing access to its port terminal services at its bulk grain export facility in Melbourne.The undertaking was submitted on 9 September 2013, following consultation on an original application submitted in March (which Emerald subsequently withdrew).

The undertaking,attached Indicative Access Agreement (IAA) and Port Loading Protocols (Loading Protocol)arelargely similarto Emerald’s 2011 Undertaking, with some notable differences:

a new requirement for customers to demonstrate access to rail and a new expectation that a significant proportion (target minimum of 50%) of cargo will be accumulated by rail;
a new expectation that customers will explore in good faith stock swap opportunities on terms agreeable to the customer; and
amendments to make clear the IAA applies to port terminal services, not up country services.

The ACCC considers the undertaking provided on 9 September 2013 (the Revised Undertaking) sufficiently addresses concerns raised during consultation on Emerald’s March undertaking. Accordingly, the ACCC considers that the Revised Undertaking is appropriate.

Summary of the ACCC’s views

The ACCC considers that the Revised Undertaking is appropriate having regard to the matters set out in subsection 44ZZA(3) of the CCA. In making its decision, the ACCC has had regard to submissions received after inviting public submissionsin accordance with section 44ZZBD. In particular, the ACCC considers that:

a one-year term is appropriate in the context of the anticipated commencement of a mandatory wheat port code of conduct on 1 October 2014
the publish-negotiate-arbitrate framework, given the inclusion of the non-discrimination, no hindering and dispute resolution provisions, is likely to ensure fair access to port terminal services supplied by Emerald to access seekers
the IAA represents an appropriate minimum standard for access to port terminal services and a reasonable starting point for commercial negotiations, and:

provides sufficient certainty for access seekers about its application being limited to port terminal services for bulk wheat
makes it sufficiently clear that it is the standard minimum terms for access, and agreements negotiated on different terms will be described as Storage and Handling Agreements
is consistent with the interests of access seekers in setting out an expectation that access seekers will explore stock swaps in good faith and on terms agreeable to them

the provisions in the Revised Undertaking relating to publication of terms, non-discriminatory access, negotiating for access, dispute resolution, confidentiality, publication of performance indicators and information gathering are substantively similar to Emerald’s 2011 Undertaking and are consistent with the interests of access seekers
a ‘first come, first served’ approach to capacity management is appropriate, given Emerald’s particular circumstances, market conditions and the effectiveness of Emerald’s previous ‘first come, first served’ capacity allocation arrangements
the information Emerald is required to provide to access seekers about available capacity (being a 12 month forecast of available capacity upon the opening of its shipping stem and rolling monthly six-month forecasts) is sufficient to allow access seekers to assess the availability of capacity against their export needs and make bookings
the Loading Protocol provides:

sufficient clarity for access seekers about whether references are to the standard terms in the IAA or negotiated and agreed Storage and Handling Agreements
sufficient certainty for access seekers and reasonable discretion for Emerald in relation to the implementation of ‘first come, first served’ capacity allocation, specifically in the treatment of Intent to Ship Advices
reasonable discretion, subject to conditions, for Emerald to respond when a client fails to provide a complying cargo assembly plan
sufficient certainty for access seekers about the proportion of cargo that Emerald expects will be accumulated by rail
reasonable discretion for Emerald to determine the order of cargo accumulation and vessel loading
sufficient certainty for access seekers about the circumstances in which Emerald is entitled not to fully accumulate a cargo
reasonable limitations on Emerald’s discretion to forfeit a client’s booking fee in the event of vessel substitution or delay
timely dispute resolution

the process for varying the Loading Protocol meets certain minimum standards for ensuring an efficient, meaningful and transparent consultation process and provides for the ACCC to have an objection role.

Overall, the ACCC has decided to accept Emerald’s Revised Undertaking, as submitted on 9 September 2013, as it considers that the Revised Undertaking is appropriate having regard to the matters set out in subsection 44ZZA(3) of the CCA.

1Background

Under Division 6 of Part IIIA of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (the CCA), the ACCC may accept an undertaking from a person who is, or expects to be, the provider of a service, in connection with the provision of access to that service.

Emerald (formerly ABA) operates a port terminal at the port of Melbourne and is currently subject to the 2011 Port Terminal Services Access Undertaking, which governs how competing exporters can access its port terminal services at its Melbourne Port Terminal (MPT).

On 26 March 2013, Emerald submitted to the ACCC a new undertaking to replace the 2011 Undertaking when it expires (Proposed Undertaking).In response to concerns raised by interested parties and the ACCC, on 9 September 2013 Emerald withdrew its Proposed Undertaking and submitted a revised undertaking for ACCC consideration (Revised Undertaking).

Pursuant to subsection 44ZZBE(1) of the CCA, the purpose of this document is to set outthe ACCC’s decision to accept the undertaking,includingthe ACCC’s reasons for that decision.

1.1Process leading to the Revised Undertaking

In its Draft Decision, the ACCC expressed the preliminary view that it would not accept the Proposed Undertaking, stating that:

certain provisions of the IAA required amendments for clarity and certainty, particularly the distinction between port and non-port terms
the Loading Protocolrequired amendment to more clearly define whether reference was being made to Emerald’s IAA or a Storage and Handling Agreement (SHA) (which is negotiated and agreed on different terms between Emerald and an access seeker).

The ACCCalso expressed concerns about:

the new requirements in relation to cargo accumulation plans and Emerald’s discretion where such plans were not provided
the uncertainty created by therequirements in relation to cargo accumulation by rail
the new requirements in relation to stock swaps
procedures in relation to vessel substitution and delay.

Prior to release of the Draft Decision, Emerald provided the ACCC with a draft revision to its Proposed Undertaking which was intended to address the concerns raised by industry. In its Draft Decision, the ACCC expressed the preliminary view that an undertaking consistent with the draft revision would be appropriate, having regard to the factors set out in subsection 44ZZA(3) of the CCA, as it sufficiently addressed the issues outlined above.

On 9 September 2013, Emerald formally withdrew the Proposed Undertaking and submitted the Revised Undertaking (consistent with the draft revision provided earlier).

Emerald has provided the following information in respect of the Proposed Undertaking and Revised Undertaking:

initial supporting submission (26 March 2013)
submission in response to third party submissions (3 July 2013)
letter explaining the changes it proposed to make to the Proposed Undertaking, whichaccompanied the draft revision of the Proposed Undertaking (31 July 2013).
Public consultation undertaken

The CCA provides that the ACCC may invite public submissions on an accessundertaking application.[1]Accordingly, the ACCC published an Issues Paper on 30 April 2013 and a Draft Decision on 14August 2013 inviting submissions on Emerald’s Proposed Undertaking and draft revision respectively. The ACCC also published Emerald’s supporting submissions, its Proposed Undertaking and its draft revision on the ACCC website and directly emailed copies of the Issues Paper and Draft Decision to relevant parties including wheat exporters, grain growers, farming organisations and state regulatory bodies.

In response to its Issues Paper, the ACCC received public submissions from Cargill Australia Limited (Cargill), Co-operative Bulk Handling Limited(CBH),andEmerald (in response to submissions).

The ACCC did not receive any submissions in response to its Draft Decision.

All of the above mentioned documents are available on the ACCC’s website at www.accc.gov.au/wheat.

1.1.2Timeline: ACCC assessment

Date / Action
26 March 2013 / Emerald lodged the Proposed Undertaking for ACCC assessment.
9 April 2013 / ACCC published Emerald’s supporting submission and the Proposed Undertaking on the ACCC website.
30 April 2013 / ACCC published the Issues Paper and invited public submissions by 21May2013.
22 May 2013 / ACCC published submissions received from interested parties.
8 July 2013 / ACCC published Emerald’s submission in response to the views of interested parties.
31 July 2013 / Emerald provided the ACCC with a draft revision to the Proposed Undertaking, intended to address concerns raised by interested parties and the ACCC
14 August 2013 / ACCC published the Draft Decision and invited public submissions, particularly on its preliminary views and Emerald’s draft revision to the Proposed Undertaking, by 28 August 2013.
9 September 2013 / Emerald formally withdrew its Proposed Undertaking and lodged the Revised Undertaking, which is consistent with the draft revision, for ACCC assessment.
25 September2013 / ACCC decided to accept the Revised Undertaking
26 September 2013 / ACCC published its decision and reasons for its decision (this document).

1.2The Revised Undertaking

Emerald’s Revised Undertaking, along with the attached IAA and Loading Protocol, is based on the general approach of Emerald’s 2011 Undertaking.Specifically, the Revised Undertaking continues to provide for the following in a substantively similar manner to the 2011 Undertaking:

a publish-negotiate-arbitrate model of access provision
non-discriminatory access, including a prohibition on hindering access
publication of performance indicators
negotiation of terms of access
dispute resolution
information gathering
publication of price and non-price terms
confidentiality of certain information
specified circumstances in which Emerald is entitled not to fully accumulate a cargo
management of vessel substitution or delay
variation of the Loading Protocol
liability and indemnity

The Revised Undertaking issomewhat different from the 2011 Undertaking in that it introduces:

a new requirement in the IAA and Loading Protocol for customers to demonstrate access to rail and a new expectation that a significant proportion(target minimum of 50%) of cargo will be accumulated by rail
a new provision in the IAA and Loading Protocol setting out an expectation that customers will explore in good faith stock swap opportunities on terms agreeable to the customer
amendments to make clear that the IAA applies to port terminal services and not up country services
a requirement that Emerald must reasonably hold the opinion that a vessel delay would cause significant disruption to the shipping stem before a Client’s booking fee may be forfeited.

In addition, Emerald’s Revised Undertaking is different from its 2011 Undertaking in a number of minor ways, including updated references to legislation and changes intended to express matters more clearly. The ACCC has addressed minor changes in the Draft Decision and this document, where relevant to the appropriateness of the Revised Undertaking, having regard to the matters in subsection 44ZZA(3) of the CCA.

1.3Where to find further information

Emerald’s accepted Revised Undertaking and other relevant materials, including Emerald’s supporting submissions and non-confidential submissions provided by stakeholders are available of the ACCC’s website at www.accc.gov.au/wheat.

Please direct any queries about this document to:

Mr David Salisbury

Deputy General Manager

Fuel, Transport and Prices Oversight

ACCC

GPO Box 520

MELBOURNE VIC 3001

Email:

2Decision making framework

The Wheat Export Marketing Act 2008 (Cth) (the WEMA) came into effect on 1 July2008, introducing an accreditation scheme for bulk wheat exports, including a requirement that vertically integrated parties seeking to export bulk wheat pass the ‘access test’.

Amendments to the WEMA in December 2012 abolished the accreditation scheme for bulk wheat exports but retained the ‘access test’ unless and until a mandatory code of conduct is established.Accordingly, parties seeking to export bulk wheat are still required to pass the access test. The access test, in part, can be met if port terminal operators that also export bulk wheat have an access undertaking accepted by the ACCC.[2]Appendix A contains further information regarding the WEMA.

2.1Legal test for accepting an access undertaking

Part IIIA of the CCA establishes a regime to assist third parties to obtain access to services provided through certain facilities in order to promote competition in upstream or downstream markets.

In assessing a proposed access undertaking under Part IIIA of the CCA, the ACCC must apply the test set out in subsection 44ZZA(3), which provides that the ACCC may accept the undertaking if it thinks it appropriate to do so, having regard to the following matters:

the objects of Part IIIA of the CCA, which are to:

promote the economically efficient operation of, use of and investment in the infrastructure by which services are provided, thereby promoting effective competition in upstream and downstream markets
provide a framework and guiding principles to encourage a consistent approach to access regulation in each industry

the ‘pricing principles’ specified in section 44ZZCA of the CCA (see further below)
the legitimate business interests of the provider of the service
the public interest, including the public interest in having competition in markets (whether or not in Australia)
the interests of persons who might want access to the service
whether the undertaking is in accordance with an access code that applies to the service
any other matters that the ACCC thinks are relevant (see Appendix A).

In relation to the pricing principles, section 44ZZCA of the CCA provides that regulated access prices should: