Workforce Investment Act
Eligibility Determination (Dislocated Worker)
Verification Date:
- Individual Information:
1. Name:
2. SS#:
3. Registration Date:
- Eligibility Verification:
(Yes = Required documentation is in record. No = Required documentation NOT in record. N/A = Not applicable – documentation not required.)
Yes
/No
/N/A
/Describe Documentation in File
1. Name2. SS#
3. Date of Birth
4. U.S. Citizen
5. Disability
6. Pell Grant
7. Selective Service
III.Services Verification:
1.Does the participant meet the definition of a dislocated worker?
has been terminated, laid off, or has received a lay-off noticeis eligible for, or has exhausted unemployment
has been employed but is not eligible for unemployment
has been terminated as a result of any substantial lay-off or plant closing
is a displaced homemaker
is an unemployed military spouse
How was this documented?
- Has the participant received core services? Yes No
If so what services?
outreach, intake, orientation to the systeminitial assessment of skill levels, aptitudes, abilities, supportive service
determination of eligibility for services for all partner E&T programs
job search, placement assistance, career counseling
local, regional, statewide labor market information
program performance and program cost information
information on local performance
information on availability of supportive services
information on filing claims for unemployment
assistance in establishing eligibility
orientation to personal computers for access to self-directed services
follow-up activities
others (list) :
- Was employment attained after the receipt of core services? Yes No
Comment:
(If yes please provide employment information.)
- Is there documentation for the need for intensive services? Yes No
Comment:
(i.e. notes from case manager)
- Does the participant have a fully-developed individual employment plan (IEP)? Yes No
Comment:
6.Has the participant received intensive services? Yes No
If so what services?
customized assessment of knowledge, skills, abilities, and interestsdevelopment of an individual employment plan
group counseling
individual career planning
case management; and
short-term pre-vocational and stand-alone services
others (list)
Comment:
(If yes, check to insure core services received first.)
- Was employment attained after the receipt of intensive services? Yes No
Comment:
- Is there documentation of the need for training services? Yes No
Comment:
- Has the participant received training services? Yes No
If so what services?
occupational skills trainingon-the-job training
private sector training
skill upgrading and retraining
entrepreneurial training
customized training
adult education and literacy activities provided in combination with services listed above
others (list)
Comment:
(If yes, check for documentation of receipt of core and intensive services.)
- Was the participant made aware of the need to access alternative funding sources such as Pell Grants before WIA funds were committed and was this documented in the file?
Yes No
- Was a certified training provider used? Yes No
Comment:
(Are they using the state training provider list?)
- Was employment attained after the receipt of training services? Yes No
Comment:
(If so, where?)
- By Regulation, post-employment follow-up services must be provided, if appropriate, for a minimum of twelve months. Was follow up done?
Yes No
If services were needed, what was provided?
- Is the participant file well organized? Yes No
Comment:
- Is the case note method used (BROCRIP/Background, Reason, Observations, Content, Results, Impressions, Plans) or a similar method that includes the BROCRIP characteristics?
Yes No
Comment:Yes / No /
Comments
Does the participant’s folder contain an “Equal Opportunity is the Law” Notice?If yes, was it signed by the participant?
Does the participant’s folder contain a Complaint/Grievance Procedure Notice?
If yes, was it signed by the participant?
Additional Comments:
Local Workforce Investment Area:
Case Manager: / Date
Questionnaire Completed By: / Date:
ELIGIBILITY DW Updated February 17 2010(2)1