Technical Review Form

Education Innovation and Research (EIR) Grant Review

2017Early-phase Application Review

(CFDA) 84.411C

Technical Review Signature Form

Panel #:Panel Monitor:

Applicant: / Reviewer Name:
PR Award :

Reviewer Home Tel:

Reviewer Work

Tel:

I have reviewed and evaluated the application, assigned scores, and written comments in accordance with the selection criteria published in the application notice.

Signature: ______Date:

Name:

Instructions:

Upon review and approval of the comments by your ED Panel Monitor, please print, sign, and mail this Technical Review Signature Form to the EIR contractor, FM Talent Source, at

EIR Review

c/o LCG Operations

1400 Key Boulevard, Suite 900

Arlington, VA 22209

Please mail all Technical Review Signature Forms using the return envelope provided in your reviewer mailing no later than July14, 2017.

US Department of Education

Education Innovation and Research (EIR) Grant Review

2017Early-phase Application Review

Application Technical Review Form for Content Reviewers

(CFDA 84.411C)

Applicant / Application Number
U411C170_ _ _
Summary Ratings
Maximum Points / Score
A. Significance / 30
B. Quality of the Project Design and Management Plan / 50
Total Score / 80

Summary Statement (Optional):

A. Significance (up to 30 points)

In determining the significance of the project, the Secretary considers the following factors:

(1)The national significance of the proposed project.

(2)The extent to which the proposed project involves the development or demonstration of promising new strategies that build on, or are alternatives to, existing strategies.

(3)The extent to which the proposed project represents an exceptional approach to the priority or priorities established for the competition.

(Maximum Points 30) Reader’s Score: ______

Strengths:

Weaknesses:

B. Quality of the Project Design and Management Plan (up to 50 points).

In determining the quality of the proposed project design, the Secretary considers the following factors:

(1)The extent to which the goals, objectives, and outcomes to be achieved by the project are clearly specified and measurable.

(2)The adequacy of the management plan to achieve the objectives of the proposed project on time and within budget, including clearly defined responsibilities, timelines, and milestones for accomplishing project tasks.

(3)The extent to which performance feedback and continuous improvement are integral to the design of the proposed project.

(4)The mechanisms the applicant will use to broadly disseminate information on its project so as to support further development or replication.

(Maximum Points 50)Reader’s Score: ______

Strengths:

Weaknesses: