SUPERPAVE Digest 386
Topics covered in this issue include:
1) Resilient Modulus Testing
by
2) Re: Resilient Modulus Testing
by
- To:
- Subject: Resilient Modulus Testing
- From:
- Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 12:48:12 -0500
What test methods are you using to determine Resilient Modulus of bituminous
mixtures? e.g. AASHTO TP31, ASTM D4123.
How have you implemented the results from resilient modulus testing?
Do you know of any vendors that sell such equipment? What is the general price
range? What is the contact information?
I would imagine that some have used their existing MTS force machines for such
tests.
- To:
- Subject: Re: Resilient Modulus Testing
- From:
- Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 15:53:21 EDT
We build them.
SUPERPAVE Digest 387
Topics covered in this issue include:
1) Resilient Modulus Testing
by Michael Heitzman <>
- To: Superpave Group <>
- Subject: Resilient Modulus Testing
- From: Michael Heitzman <>
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 08:32:05 -0500
The LTPP contractors had a lot of problem with this test in the early
stages of material characterization. A modified test method, developed
in Florida, is currently being used in the LTPP program (Protocol P07).
There has been extensive discussion on this subject at the TRB-LTPP
Materials ETG meetings. Aramis Lopez (FHWA) can provide you with more
details on the test method.
What you want to do with the test results will have a large influence on
the test method selected (ie..the level of accuracy and repeatability
needed). While the modified test is more repeatable, the cost and time
to prepare/test the specimen may more than the application requires.
Good Luck
SUPERPAVE Digest 388
Topics covered in this issue include:
1) Re: Resilient Modulus Testing
by
- To:
- Subject: Re: Resilient Modulus Testing
- From:
- Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 13:27:18 EDT
If you can make a cylinder with some height to it, you are better off doing
dynamic modulus or the soils versions of resilient modulus. If you can only
make a hockey puck (which is what you will often have by default with a
core), you are effectively limited to indirect tension type modulus testing
and you are going to have to accept the limitations of that test. Some of
the limitations can be overcome to some degree by fancy instrumentation, but
there are others that are pretty difficult to overcome because of the laws of
physics. Obviously, one way to deal with some of the variability issues is
to increase the number of replicates ... a solution which nobody wants to
hear because it means more work, and, in the case of coring, means more swiss
cheese.