DR.SC.-05Annual Mentor's Report on the Doctoral Candidate's Progress

S V E U Č I L I Š T E U Z A G R E B U

U N I V E R S I T Y OF Z A G R E B

DR.SC.-05Annual mentor's report on the doctoral candidate's progress

DR.SC.-05 ANNUAL MENTOR'S REPORT ON THE DOCTORAL CANDIDATE'S PROGRESS[1]
Name of the doctoral study programme:
MENTOR(S)
MENTOR(S): / First and last name, title: / Institution, country:
First mentor:
Second mentor:
First and last name, and title of the doctoral candidate:
ScientistID of the doctoral candidate: / Report for the academic year:
On the scale from 1 to 5 grade satisfaction with the quality of conferences held with the doctoral candidate: / 1 - insufficient 2 - sufficient 3 - good 4 – very good 5 - excellent
If in the previous question you chose 1 or 2, explain and propose how to amend that:
Has a work plan been made, and is the doctoral candidate making progress according to the plan?
(please fill in box) / Work plan has been made: / Progress has been made according to work plan:
yes no / yes no
If no, explain why and propose how to amend that:
Evaluation of the quality of progress of the doctoral candidate’s research (since last report): / 1 - insufficient 2 - sufficient 3 - good 4 – very good 5 - excellent
If in the previous question you chose no, explain why and propose what steps should be taken to amend that:
Comment on the doctoral candidate’s progress since the last report:
EVALUATION OF THE DOCTORAL CANDIDATE
Please grade on the scale from 1 to five:
(1 - insufficient,2 - sufficient, 3 -good, 4 –very good, 5 - excellent) / The doctoral candidate comes to conferences with mentor well-prepared / 12345
Planning and realization of annual research activities andprofessional training / 12345
Progress in mastering of methodology of scientific research / 12345
Writing and publication of scientific/scholarly works / 12345
Doctoral candidate’s overall attitude to the study programme / 12345
On the scale from 1 to 5 grade the overall quality of the doctoral candidate’s work: / 1 - insufficient 2 - sufficient 3 - good 4 – very good 5 - excellent
If in the previous question you chose 1 or 2, explain and propose how to amend that:
DECISION ON CONTINUATION OF STUDY
Can the doctoral candidate continue study? / a) Yes
b) Yes, with certain conditions
c) No
If in the previous question you chose b or c, explain:
Other comments and opinions by the mentor(s):
(as needed):
Place, date and signature
Zagreb, (date) Signature
(first and last name of the first mentor)
Official stamp here Signature
(first and last name of the second mentor)

FormDR.SC.-05Annual mentor's report on the doctoral candidate's progress

[1]Please send the filled -out form DR.SC.-05, in electronic and written format, and signed, to the appropriate Registrar's Office. The Registrar's Office forwards the filled-out form to the Council of the study programme.