CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS SWOT ANALYSIS
(31st March 2003)
The Clinical Effectiveness (CEf) Strategy has three main components: inform, change, monitor. These have been used as the basis for this SWOT analysis
Aspect / Inform /Change
/ MonitorConsiderations / Besides our own staff, we need to consider:
Stakeholders:
Patients, RBAT staff, User Groups, Acute & Community Care are all involved with the performance of the service & so have expectations of Clinical Effectiveness & its outcome
External Environment
Local partnerships, voluntary agencies, other ambulance services, ASA, CHI, DoH generate audit work, either by setting standards & audit requirements or as partners with RBAT in collaborative audit & development work / This reflects the effectiveness of the audit cycle in RBAT.
Learning
Encouraging the participation of staff in audit & research through making information available, links to clinical education & training, training in audit tools, research methodology & change management techniques
Growth
Increasing the capability of RBAT – giving feedback on outcomes & identifying good practice & learning points to the service in its delivery of patient care & with supporting the participation of staff in audit & research. / Internal Processes:
Planning of audit & capacity, data quality, communications (making audit information available) & accountability. Managing the integration of clinical effectiveness activities with other aspects of Clinical Governance
Aspect / Inform /
Change
/ MonitorStrengths /
- Good links with other ambulance services & ASA
- Data entry to ASA MI database up-to-date
- Publication of audit & research tools
- Intranet with access to Internet
- Medical Director
- Computer network
- Some progress with communicating with staff
- Developing relationships with voluntary groups & First Responders
- Framework established through clinical effectiveness policy
- Annual planning in operation
Weaknesses
/- Time to enable further networking
- No public or patient involvement
- Little use of Internet for literature searching
- Staff rotas preclude time to access Intranet
- Communications need strengthening
- Other forums for discussions are challenged by lack of allocated time
- A need to develop an open culture in the Trust
- Low clinical involvement in audit & research
- Lack of dedicated staff time
- No external reviewer other than ad hoc peer review
Opportunities /
- Build up reputation in national arena through meetings, publications & other contributions
- Developing work with Hosp / PCT focus Groups
- New interactive Intranet
- Implementation of ASA/JRCALC Clinical Guidelines will form basis of future audits
- More staff to be involved in Clinical Governance activities through portfolio of evidence
- Improvements to data management through EPRF
- Clinical audit to be formally incorporated into PP training
- Greater operational effectiveness developing
Threats /
- To keep local initiatives active against other priorities
- Formal links & feedback to training underdeveloped, closing the loop
- High priority attached to updating of staff & the introduction of new procedures & equipment (eg for thrombolysis) may limit audit training
Progress
April 2003 /- CEfD move to Medical Directorate will enable staff to focus more on audit and research
- PALS manager recruited
- Paramedic seconded to CEfD for 6 months to expand communications with road staff
- Same Paramedic will continue the work with managing RBAT’s review of ASA/JRCALC Clinical Guidelines
- CHI review re-scheduled - ? Dec ‘03
- CHD CHI review due June/July ‘03
May 2003 /
- RDDirect is now available on the J-drive\Station Uniformity directory – it provides info on research methods and critical appraisal
- Training section of CEf mtg will identify items highlighted for improvement through discussion in the meeting. This will continue until it can be demonstrated that significant improvements have been made
- UK E-PRF group meeting
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003