JURY PRESIDENT REPORT

Please send this report to

Your name
email
Telephone number
Date and place of the competition
Date of report
Kind of competition
1° Officials
Aspirant
CEC delegate
Chief Route Setter
Did you organize the Official’s Meeting before the Technical meeting?
Did all officials took part at this meeting?
Your global evaluation about the work of theCEC team (Delegate, Chief Route Setter, Jury president,) (min=0 / max = 8)
2° CEC Delegate
Cooperation with the CEC delegate
Behaviour of the CEC delegate
3° Judges team
Judges:
Was there a judges course or clinic?
Number sufficient of judges
Experience/Certification of judges
Did they wear any kind of uniform?
Cooperation and behaviour of judges
Your global evaluation about the work of the judges team, (min=0 / max = 8) / 7
4° Routesetting team
Chief Route Setter:
Knowledge of the rules by the Chief Route Setter (for what you have seen)
Cooperation and behaviour of the Chief Route Setter
Route Setters:
Did the route setting team wear any kind of uniform?
Cooperation and behaviour of the Route Setters
Did the route setting team respect strictly the official timetable?
Effectiveness of the routes or problems
During his work did the route setting team respect the safety rules? If no, please describe what happened
Your global evaluation about the work of the route setting team (min=0 / max = 8)
5° Organization
Name of the organizer:
Cooperation with the organizer
Communication with athletes
Your global evaluation about relationship between CEC team and Organizer (min=0 / max = 8)
Was there enough personnel to carry on any requested work (isolation zone, transit zone ecc.)?
Facilities of the venue
Appreciation of the warming up area
Appreciation of the wall or boulder-structures and mats
Appreciation of Iso area , access to wash rooms…
Comments on award ceremony (CEC identification, , podium, medals,trophies, grants)
Your global evaluation about competition facilities and personnel (min=0 / max = 8)
6° Competition
Belaying team (lead)
Quality of belaying team (lead)
Incidents / technical incidents
Was the restoring of technical incident fast?
Appeals (description, judge involved, final decision)
Did you involve the Chief Route Setter in Appeals Jury as consultant?
Yellow cards (athlete, description)
Red cards (athlete, description)
Injuries in warming up area (athlete and short description)
Injuries in competition (athlete and short description)
Doping controls
Your global evaluation about the competition from a technical point of view (min=0 / max = 8)
7° Audience and show
Your global evaluation about the advertising of the event (min=0 / max = 8)
Was the venue comfortable to public?
Was there enough place for all?
Did the public pay a ticket to enter the venue?
During the competition was the public informed about the running of the competition by a speaker?
Was there an updating screen for the results?
If you were a member of the public which should be your global evaluation of the competition? (min=0 / max = 8)
And about the presentation of the show? (min=0 / max = 8)
Your global evaluation as JP about the competition from a spectacular point of view (min=0 / max = 8)
Was there any TV coverage?
Any suggestion about how to bring an understable and spectacular show to a maximum of people?
8° Result Service
Was there an online result services?
Quality of the internet connection
Was the result service close to the judges table?
Had you technical problems with the official program?
Had the organiser or you a second back-up system?
Were the results on-line at the end of the competition?
Comments on results service
9° Strong / critical points
Strong points
Critical points
10° Other
Please write here any other comments you would like to make (observations on the rules, ideas for improving the show, etc.)