Directorate: Curriculum FET

CAPS
Moderation Checklists

Accounting

Subject Advisor: MrsElmareeEksteen

Cell: 082 874 2079

Office: 021- 900 7043

E-mail:

Fax: 086 219 7092

MODERATION CHECKLIST: SCHOOL LEVEL (Internal)

ACCOUNTING EXAMINATION

Name of school
Grade / 10 / 11 / 12
Name of teacher
Name of moderator
Date of moderation
Examination date
YES / NO / COMMENT
A. / The question paper adheres to the requirements in terms of:
1. / Total time allocation
2. / Mark allocation
3. / Content covered in line with CAPS
4. / Active and critical learning approach evident in papers including conceptual understanding, application and reflection questions.
5. / Integration of ethics and internal control aspects evident
6. / Cognitive levels appropriately addressed.
7. / Difficulty levels appropriate
8. / General Instructions to learners are clear and unambiguous.
9. / Questions are phrased clearly and unambiguously.
10. / Language usage is correct
11. / Acceptable technical quality - all text will be clearly legible when copied
B. / Detailed marking memorandum
1. / Appropriate mark allocation indicated per question.
2. / Method marks indicated and explained where appropriate.
3. / Typed and presented neatly
C. / Marking of scripts and recording of marks
1 / Adequate sample of scripts have been moderated.
2 / Accurate and consistent application of marking memorandum.
3 / Accurate recording of marks on WCED CAPS mark sheets
D. / Additional comments/recommendations:
Details of moderated scripts
Surname, Name of learner / Class / Mark of teacher / Mark of moderator / Comment
1
2
3
4
5
TEACHER / MODERATOR
DATE: / DATE:

1

MODERATION CHECKLIST: SCHOOL LEVEL (Internal)

ACCOUNTING TESTS

Name of school
Grade / 10 / 11 / 12
Name of teacher
Name of moderator
Date of moderation
Date of test

TEST AND MEMORANDUM

YES / NO / COMMENT
A. / The test adheres to the requirements in terms of:
1. / Total time allocation – 1 hour
2. / Mark allocation - 100 marks
3. / Content covered in line with CAPS
4. / Active and critical learning approach evident in questions including conceptual understanding, application and reflection questions.
5. / Integration of ethics and internal control aspects evident
6. / Cognitive levels appropriately addressed.
7. / Difficulty levels appropriate
8. / Instructions to learners are clear and unambiguous.
9. / Language usage is correct
10. / Acceptable technical quality - neat and all text will be legible after copying
B. / Detailed marking memorandum
1. / Appropriate mark allocation per question.
2. / Method marks indicated and explained where appropriate
3. / Typed and presented neatly
C. / Marking of scripts and recording of marks
1 / Adequate sample of scripts have been moderated.
2 / Accurate and consistent application of marking memorandum.
3 / Accurate recording of marks on WCED CAPS mark sheets
D. / Additional comments/recommendations
Details of moderated scripts
Surname, Name of learner / Class / Mark of teacher / Mark of moderator / Comment
1
2
3
4
5
TEACHER / MODERATOR
DATE: / DATE:

MODERATION CHECKLIST: SCHOOL LEVEL (Internal)

ACCOUNTING

GRADE / 10 / 11 / 12
FORM OF ASSESSMENT (FoA) / PROJECT / WRITTEN REPORT / PRESENTATION / CASE STUDY
Name of school
Name of teacher
Name of moderator
Date of moderation
Date of FoA

TASK AND MARKING INSTRUMENT

YES / NO / COMMENT
A. / The task adheres to the guideline requirements in terms of:
1a / Reasonable time frames given
1b / Are the date issued and due date indicated?
2. / Suitable mark allocation (50)
3. / Suitable content/topics
4a / Were the learners given clear instructions?
4b / Is the date of issue and due date clearly indicated and fair?
5. / Language usage is correct
6. / Acceptable technical quality
7. / Suitable marking instrument
B. / Marking of learners’ work and recording of marks
1. / Adequate sample of scripts have been moderated.
2. / Accurate and consistent application of marking instrument.
3. / Accurate recording of marks on WCED CAPS mark sheets
C. / Additional comments/ recommendations:
Details of moderated scripts
Surname, Name of learner / Class / Mark of teacher / Mark of moderator / Comment
1
2
3
4
5
TEACHER / MODERATOR
DATE: / DATE:

MODERATION AT DISTRICT LEVEL

PROJECT

FORMAT OF MODERATION (cluster, face, etc.)

SCHOOL
DATE of moderation
TEACHER
GRADE / 10 / 11 / 12
Exemplar task used / YES / NO
A. / Teacher’s records
General requirements / Comment
1 / What are the allocated marks?
2 / Is the content addressed aligned to CAPS?
3 / Are the different cognitive levels addressed?
4a / Were the learners given clear instructions?
4b / Is the issuing and due dates indicated and fair?
5 / Is the tool for assessing learners’ performance appropriate? (Rubric)
6 / Does the assessment tool reflect the required criteria?
7 / Does the tool give learners a clear understanding of what is expected, in order to achieve at the different levels?
B. / Evidence
1. / Are the learner’s project and the assessment tool available for moderation?
2. / Is there evidence that the learner's project has been assessed? (Ticks, comments in the project, etc)
3. / Is the final mark awarded to the learner a fair reflection of his/her efforts?
C. / Internal moderation
1. / Is there evidence of internal moderation at school level?
2. / What evidence is there?
3. / Has the marks been accurately recorded on WCED CAPS mark sheets?
D. / General comments
Details of moderated scripts
Surname, Name of learner / Class / Mark of teacher / Mark of moderator / Comment
1
2
3
4
5
MODERATOR / SUBJECT ADVISOR
DATE: / DATE:

MODERATION AT DISTRICT LEVEL

PRESENTATION

FORMAT OF MODERATION (cluster, face, etc.)

SCHOOL
DATE of MODERATION
TEACHER
GRADE / 10 / 11 / 12
Exemplar task used / YES / NO
A. / Teacher’s records
General requirements / Comment
1 / What are the allocated marks?
2 / Is the content addressed aligned to CAPS?
3 / Are the different cognitive levels addressed?
4a / Were the learners given clear instructions?
4b / Is the issuing and due dates indicated and fair?
5 / Is the tool for assessing learners’ performance appropriate? (Rubric)
6 / Does the assessment tool reflect the required criteria?
7 / Does the tool give learners a clear understanding of what is expected, in order to achieve at the different levels?
B. / Evidence
1. / Are the learner’s presentation and the assessment tool available for moderation?
2. / Is there evidence that the learner's presentation has been assessed? (Ticks, comments on the presentation, etc)
3. / Is the final mark awarded to the learner a fair reflection of his/her efforts?
C. / Internal moderation
1. / Is there evidence of internal moderation at school level?
2. / What evidence is there?
3. / Has the marks been accurately recorded on WCED CAPS mark sheets?
D. / General comments
Details of moderated scripts
Surname, Name of learner / Class / Mark of teacher / Mark of moderator / Comment
1
2
3
4
5
MODERATOR / SUBJECT ADVISOR
DATE: / DATE:

MODERATION AT DISTRICT LEVEL

CASE STUDY

FORMAT OF MODERATION (cluster, face, etc.)

SCHOOL
DATE of MODERATION
TEACHER
GRADE / 10 / 11 / 12
Exemplar task used / YES / NO
A. / Teacher’s records
General requirements / Comment
1 / What are the allocated marks?
2 / Is the content addressed aligned to CAPS?
3 / Are the different cognitive levels addressed?
4a / Were the learners given clear instructions?
4b / Is the date of issue and due date clearly indicated and fair?
5 / Is the tool for assessing learners’ performance appropriate? (Rubric)
6 / Does the assessment tool reflect the required criteria?
7 / Does the tool give learners a clear understanding of what is expected, in order to achieve at the different levels?
B. / Evidence
1. / Are the learner’s task and the assessment tool available for moderation?
2. / Is the final mark awarded to the learner a fair reflection of his/her efforts?
C. / Internal moderation
1. / Is there evidence of internal moderation at school level?
2. / What evidence is there?
3. / Has the marks been accurately recorded on WCED CAPS mark sheets?
D. / General comments
Details of moderated scripts
Surname, Name of learner / Class / Mark of teacher / Mark of moderator / Comment
1
2
3
4
5
MODERATOR / SUBJECT ADVISOR
DATE: / DATE:

MODERATION AT DISTRICT LEVEL

WRITTEN REPORT

FORMAT OF MODERATION (cluster, face, etc.)

SCHOOL
DATE of MODERATION
TEACHER
GRADE / 10 / 11 / 12
Exemplar task used / YES / NO
A. / Teacher’s records
General requirements / Comment
1 / What are the allocated marks?
2 / Is the content addressed aligned to CAPS?
3 / Are the different cognitive levels addressed?
4a / Were the learners given clear instructions?
4b / Is the issuing and due dates indicated and fair?
5 / Is the tool for assessing learners’ performance appropriate? (Rubric)
6 / Does the assessment tool reflect the required criteria?
7 / Does the tool give learners a clear understanding of what is expected, in order to achieve at the different levels?
B. / Evidence
1. / Are the learner’s presentation and the assessment tool available for moderation?
2. / Is there evidence that the learner's task has been assessed? (Ticks, comments in the presentation, etc)
3. / Is the final mark awarded to the learner a fair reflection of his/her efforts?
C. / Internal moderation
1. / Is there evidence of internal moderation at school level?
2. / What evidence is there?
3. / Has the marks been accurately recorded on WCED CAPS mark sheets?
D. / General comments
Details of moderated scripts
Surname, Name of learner / Class / Mark of teacher / Mark of moderator / Comment
1
2
3
4
5
MODERATOR / SUBJECT ADVISOR
DATE: / DATE:

MODERATION AT DISTRICT LEVEL

TESTS / TEST 1 / TEST 2

FORMAT OF MODERATION (cluster, face, etc.)

SCHOOL
DATE of MODERATION
TEACHER
GRADE / 10 / 11 / 12
Exemplar test used / YES / NO
A. / Teacher’s records
General requirements / Comment
1 / What are the allocated marks?
2 / What is the allocated time?
3 / Is the content addressed aligned to CAPS?
4 / Active and critical learning approach evident in papers including conceptual understanding, application and reflection questions.
5 / Integration of ethics and internal control aspects evident
6 / Are the different cognitive levels addressed?
7 / Were the learners given clear instructions?
8 / Technical appearance – neat and all text clearly legible after copying?
B. / Detailed marking memorandum
1. / Appropriate mark allocation in total and per question
2. / Typed and presented neatly
C. / Marking of scripts and recording of marks
1 / Adequate sample of scripts have been moderated.
2 / Marking according to marking memorandum is satisfactory.
3 / Accurate recording of marks on WCED CAPS recording sheets
D. / Internal moderation
1 / Is there evidence of internal moderation at school level?
2 / What evidence is there?
E. / General comments
Details of moderated scripts
Surname, Name of learner / Class / Mark of teacher / Mark of moderator / Comment
1
2
3
4
5
MODERATOR / SUBJECT ADVISOR
DATE: / DATE:

MODERATION AT DISTRICT LEVEL

EXAMINATIONS

MID-YEAR / TRIAL / END-OF-YEAR

FORMAT OF MODERATION (cluster, face, etc.)

SCHOOL
DATE of MODERATION
TEACHER
GRADE / 10 / 11 / 12
A. / Teacher’s records
General requirements / Comment
1 / What are the allocated marks?
2 / What is the allocated time?
3 / Is the content addressed aligned to CAPS?
4 / Active and critical learning approach evident in papers including conceptual understanding, application and reflection questions.
5 / Integration of ethics and internal control aspects evident
6 / Are the different cognitive levels addressed?
7 / Were the learners given clear instructions?
8 / Technical appearance – neat and all text clearly legible after copying?
B. / Detailed marking memorandum
1a / Appropriate mark allocation in total and per question.
1b / Method marks clearly indicated and explained where applicable
2. / Typed and presented neatly
C. / Marking of scripts and recording of marks
1 / Adequate sample of scripts have been moderated.
2 / Marking according to marking memorandum is satisfactory.
3 / Accurate recording of marks on WCED CAPS recording sheets?
D. / Internal moderation
1 / Is there evidence of internal moderation at school level?
2 / What evidence is there?
E. / General comments
Details of moderated scripts
Surname, Name of learner / Class / Mark of teacher / Mark of moderator / Comment
1
2
3
4
5
MODERATOR / SUBJECT ADVISOR
DATE: / DATE:

1