For Special Protection Areas (Spa)

NATURA 2000

STANDARD DATA FORM

FOR SPECIAL PROTECTION AREAS (SPA)

FOR SITES ELIGIBLE FOR IDENTIFICATION AS SITES OF COMMUNITY IMPORTANCE (SCI)

AND

FOR SPECIAL AREAS OF CONSERVATION (SAC)

SITE IDENTIFICATION

1.1. TYPE / 1.2. SITE CODE / 1.3. COMPILATION DATE / 1.4. UPDATE
Special Areas of Conservation / PL (?) / 27.11.2001
1.6. RESPONDENTS(s):
Grzegorz Bobrowicz, ul. Leśna 24, 56-100 Wołów
Krzysztof Konieczny, Instytut Ochrony Przyrody PAN, Dolnośląska Stacja Terenowa
ul. Podwale 75, 50-449 Wrocław;
1.7. SITE NAME:
Miękińskie Bagna (Swamp forests and wet meadows near Miękinia)
1.8. SITE INDICATION AND DESIGNATION DATE:
DATE SITE PROPOSED AS EMERALD SITE / DATE CONFITMED AS EMERALD SITE
30.11.2001

SITE LOCATION

2.1. SITE CENTRE LOCATION
LONGITUDE / LATITUDE
16o44’20” / 51o11’20”
2.2. AREA (ha): / 2.3. SITE LENGHT (km):
about 900 ha / 5,5 km
2.4. ALTITUDE (m):
MINIMUM / MAXIMUM / MEAN
101,5 / 105,5 / 103,5
2.5. ADMINISTRATIVE REGION: / 2.3. SITE LENGHT (km):
CODE / REGION NAME / % COVER
GOC2 / DOLNOŚLĄSKIE / 100,00
2.6. BIOGEOGRAPHIC REGION
Anatolian / Alpine / Arctic / Atlantic / Boreal / Continental
Macronesian / Mediterranean / Pannonian / Black Sea / Steppic

ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION

3.1.HABITAT types present on site and assessment for them:

3.1.a. ANNEX I HABITAT TYPES:

CODE / % COVER / REPRESENTATIVITY / RELATIVE SURFACE / CONSERVATION STATUS / GLOBAL
ASSESSMENT
*91E0 / 12 /

A

/ B / C / D / A / B / C /

A

/ B / C /

A

/ B / C
9170 / 10 /

A

B

/ C / D / A / B / C /

A

/ C /

/ C
6510 / 5 /

/ C / D / A / B / C / A /

/ C / A /

/ C
6410 / <2 /

/ C / D / A / B / C /

/ B / C /

/ B / C
3260 / 1 /

/ C / D / A / B / C /

/ C / A /

3.1.b. HABITAT RECORDING FOR SURFACES COVERED BY OTHER IMPORTANT HABITAT TYPES:

CODE / % COVER
53.21 / 35
44.9112 / 25
53.1 / 5
52.16 / <2
37.25 / <2
82. / 1

3.2 SPECIES

covered by Article 4 of Directive 79/409/EEC

and

listed in Annex II of Directive 92/43/EEC

and

site assessment for them:

3.2.a. BIRDS listed on Annex I of Council directive 79/409/EEC

CODE / NAME / POPULATION / SITE ASSESSEMENT
Resident / Migratory / Population / Conservation / Isolation / Global
Bred / Winter / Stage
Ciconia nigra / 1-5 / A / B / C / D / A / B / C / A / B / C /

/ B / C
Cygnus cygnus / V / A /

/ B /

/ A /

Pernis apivorus / 1-5 / A / B /

/ D /

/ B / C / A / B /

/ C
Milvus milvus / 1-5 / A / B / C / D / A / B / C / A / B / C /

/ B / C
Haliaetus albicilla / R / A / B /

/ D /

/ B / C / A / B /

/ A /

/ C
Circus aeruginosus / 1-5 / A / B /

/ B / C / A / B /

/ A /

/ C
Circus cyaneus / R / A / B /

/ B / C / A / B /

/ A /

/ C
Circus pygargus / V / A / B /

/ B / C / A / B /

/ A /

/ C
Aquila pomarina / 1-5 / A / B /

/ B / C / A / B /

/ A /

/ C
Porzana porzana / 1-5 / A / B /

/ B / C / A / B /

/ A /

/ C
Crex crex / 1-5 / A / B /

/ D /

/ B / C / A / B /

/ A /

/ C
Grus grus / 6-10 / A / B /

/ B / C / A / B /

/ A /

/ C
Picus canus / 1-5 / A / B /

/ D /

/ B / C / A / B /

/ A /

/ C
Dryocopus martius / 1-5 / A / B /

/ B / C / A / B /

/ A /

/ C
Dendrocopos medius / 6-10 / A / B / C / D / A / B / C / A / B / C / A / B / C
Lullula arborea / 1-5 / A / B /

/ B / C / A / B /

/ A /

/ C
Ficedula albicollis / 1-5 / A / B /

/ B / C / A / B /

/ A /

/ C
Lanius collurio / C / A / B /

/ B / C / A / B /

/ A /

/ C
Tringa glareola / R / A / B / C / D / A / B / C / A / B / C / A /

/ C
Ciconia ciconia / 1-5 / A / B /

/ D /

/ B / C / A / B /

/ A /

/ C
Caprimulgus europaeus / 1-5 / A / B /

/ C / A / B /

/ A /

/ C
Alcedo atthis / 1-5 / A / B / C / D / A /

/ C / A / B / C / A /

/ C

3.2.c. MAMMALS listed on Annex II of Council directive 92/43/EEC

CODE / NAME / POPULATION / SITE ASSESSEMENT
Resident / Migratory / Population / Conservation / Isolation / Global
Bred / Winter / Stage
Castor fiber / C /

/ B /

/ D /

/ B / C / A / B /

/ C

3.3 Other Important Species of Flora and Fauna

GROUP / SCIENTIFIC NAME / POPULATION / MOTIVATION
B / M / A / R / F / I / P
X / Panurus biarmicus / R /

/ B /

X / Apatura ilia / R /

/ B /

X / Dactylorhiza maculata / V /

/ B /

X / Dianthus superbus / V /

/ B /

X / Epipactis palustris / V /

/ B /

X / Falco tinnunculus / V / A / B /

X / Falco subbuteo / V / A / B /

X / Tringa ochropus / R / A / B /

X / Upupa epops / V / A / B /

X / Picus viridis / R / A / B /

X / Anthus pratensis / C / A / B /

X / Locustella naevia / C / A / B /

X / Locustella fluviatillis / C / A / B /

X / Locustella luscinioides / R / A / B /

X / Acrocephalus arundinaceus / R / A / B /

X / Lanius excubitor / R / A / B /

X / Nyctalus noctula / R / A / B /

X / Mustela erminea / V / A / B /

X / Rana esculenta / R / A / B /

X / Rana lesonae / R / A / B /

X / Rana arvalis / C / A / B /

X / Rana temporaria / C / A / B /

X / Hyla arborea / C / A / B /

X / Sphagnum spp. / C / A / B /

X / Anas querquedula / R / A / B / C /

X /

Anas clypeata

/ V / A / B / C /

X / Coturnix coturnix / V / A / B / C /

X / Gallinago gallinago / C / A / B / C /

X / Scolopax rusticola / C / A / B / C /

X / Tringa totanus / V / A / B / C /

X / Streptopelia turtur / R / A / B / C /

X / Hedera helix / R / A / B / C /

X / Gladiolus imbricatus / V / A / B /

X / Nuphar lutea / R / A / B / C /

X / Dactylorhiza majalis / V / A / B / C /

X / Listera ovata / R / A / B /

X / Platanthera bifolia / V / A / B / C /

X / Euphorbia palustris / R / A / B / C /

(B=Birds, M=Mammals, A=Amphibians, R=Reptiles, F=Fish, I=Invertebrates, P=Plants)

SITE DESCRIPTION

4.1. GENERAL SITE CHARACTER:

This site contains a big bog woodland (50%) and marsh (50%). The best of this area is very important type of forests: Ribeso nigri – Alnetum and Fraxino-Alnetum. Local these bog woodlands are to a high degree very natural. It is good breeding places of such skittish birds as Ciconia nigra, Grus grus, Tringa ochropus. Woodpeckers populations are significant value in this forest, too (Picus canus, Picus viridis, Dryocopus martius and Dendrocopos medius). Next important habitats are wet meadows and marshes, especially Magnocaricion and Phragmition. This is a breeding area of Gallinago gallinago, Porzana porzana and Grus grus, too. Very characteristic mammal of this site is Castor fiber.

4.2. QUALITY AND IMPORTANCE:

The site is a very important ecological corridor along Odra River. It contains 5 habitats listed in Annex I of Council directive 92/43/ECC (one is priority). There are lives here:

22 species of bird listed on Annex I of Council directive 79/409/EEC;
1 species of animals listed on Annex II of Council directive 92/43/EEC;
5 species from the polish Red Lists of plants and animals;
19 species of animals listed on international conventions (Annex IV of 92/43/ECC, Bern);
12 species of rare plants or animals protected in Poland by law;
2 another rare species of plants or animals.

4.3. VULNERABILITY:

There is no special vulnerability for this area in this moment, but this kind of human pressure may be dangerous for the site:

drainage of any part of the site or their neighbourhood;
privatisation of forest, ox-bows or wet meadows;
intensification of forestry in the site;

4.4. SITE DESIGNATION:

Regional level: area designated for protection of biotopes characteristic for Odra river valley.

National level: part of the Odra valley – one of the most important ecological corridors in Poland and Central Europe, joining the Sudety Mts. with the Baltic coast.

4.5. OWNERSHIP:

State, some fragments private

4.6. DOCUMENTATION:

ANIOŁ-KWIATKOWSKA J., WERETELNIK E.. Flora rezerwatu „Zabór”. [w:] Anioł-Kwiatkowska J. (red.). Ochrona przyrody w południowo-zachodniej Polsce. Szata roślinna rezerwatów przyrody województwa wrocławskiego. Acta Univ. Wrat. 1667, Prace Bot. 62: 277-286.

BOBROWICZ G. 1996. Projektowane parki krajobrazowe w dolinie Odry na Dolnym Śląsku. Przegląd Przyrodniczy 7, 1: 3-24.

BOBROWICZ G., MACICKA-PAWLIK T. 1995. Projektowane rezerwaty przyrody i użytki ekologiczne w Parku Krajobrazowym Dolina Odry I. W: Jankowski W. (Red.). Dokumentacja przyrodnicza Parku Krajobrazowego Dolina Odry I. Mscr.

DROZDOWSKA B., MACICKA T. 1994. Lasy zachodniej części Pradoliny Wrocławskiej. Acta Univ. Wrat. 1606, Prace Botaniczne 60: 53-93.

JAKUBIEC Z., KONIECZNY K. 1997. Wniosek o podjęcie działań ochronnych w kompleksie leśno-łąkowym w rejonie rezerwatu „Zabór”. Mscr, PTPP „proNatura”, Wrocław.

JANKOWSKI W., ŚWIERKOSZ K. (red.). 1995. Korytarz ekologiczny doliny Odry. Stan - funkcjonowanie - zagrożenia. Fundacja IUCN Poland, Warszawa.

KONIECZNY K. 1998. Ekologia rozrodu żurawia Grus grus na Ziemi Wołowskiej. Praca magisterska wykonana w Zakładzie Ekologii Ptaków Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego. Mscr.

MACICKA T., WILCZYŃSKA W. 1993. Aktualna roślinność doliny środkowej Odry i jej zagrożenia. [w:] Tomiałojć L. (red.). Ochrona przyrody i środowiska w dolinach nizinnych rzek Polski. Wydawnictwo IOP PAN, Kraków: 49-60.

MACICKA-PAWLIK T., WILCZYŃSKA W. 1998. Interesujące elementy przyrody żywej projektowanego Nadodrzańskiego Wrocławsko-Ścinawskiego Parku Krajobrazowego. Chrońmy Przyr. Ojcz. 54, 5: 98-106.

MACICKA-PAWLIK T., WILCZYŃSKA W. 1998. Wartości przyrodnicze projektowanego Parku Krajobrazowego Dolina Odry I. Acta Univ. Wrat. 2036, Prace Bot. 74: 165-200.

OGIELSKA M., KONIECZNY K. 1999. Herpetofauna pradoliny Odry w okolicach Wrocławia: dwa lata po wielkiej powodzi. Przeg. Zoolog. 43, 3-4: 207-214.

ŚWIERKOSZ K. 2000. (eds.). Propozycje do ostoi NATURA 2000. Cz. I. (odcinek Brzeg Dolny – Nowa Sól). POPiEK, DFE, Wrocław.

5. SITE PROTECTION STATUS AND RELATION WITH

CORINE BIOTOPES

5.1. DESIGNATION TYPES at National and regional level:

No status protected.

5.2. RELATION OF THE DESCRIBED SITE WITH OTHER SITES:

designated an National or Regional level:

35 ha of this site covered by Nature Reserve (Zabór, 35ha)

designated at International level:

none, so far.

5.3. RELATION OF THE DESCRIBED SITE WITH CORINE BIOTOPES SITE:

CORINE SITE CODE / OVERLAP TYPE / % COVER
none, so far

HUMAN ACTIVITIES IN AND AROUND THE SITE

6.1. GENERAL IMPACT AND ACTIVITIES AND PROPORTION OF THE SURFACE OF THE SITE AFFECTED:

Forestry: <50%, big influence (so far), negative

Pasture and meadow culture: 40%, low influence, positive (so far)

6.2. SITE MANAGEMENT:

BODY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SITE MANAGEMENT:

SITE MANAGEMENT AND PLANTS:

MAPS OF THE SITE

- Physical map: 1: 50 000.

- Map of designated sites described in 5: no

- Aerial photograph(s) included: no

SITE DESCRIPTION

4.7. HISTORY

DATE / KEYWORD / DESCRIPTION
page 1