SUMMARY OF DATA: Waterwells Primary school July 2017

End of Reception Data / ATTAINMENT ON ENTRY

% working at expected or above levels
(CEM BASELINE) / % achieving expected level/
+ at end of Reception* / % difference
to EYFS data / COMMENTARY/
Overall GLD at end of R (2017)
READING / 45.8% / 78.3% / +32.5% / 69.9% pupils achieved a good level of development (GLD)
(National figure 2016= 66.3%)
In year tracking highlights that pupils made better than expected progress in Reading and maths. Progress was in line with expectations for writing.
There were no differences in progress rates between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils.
WRITING / 45.8% / 70% / +24.2%
MATHS / 55.9% / 85% / +29.1%

RECEPTION OUTCOMES: disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged

ATTAINMENT / PROGRESS (expected = 2.5)
% GLD / READING / WRITING / MATHS
ALL / PP / NOT PP / ALL / PP / NOT PP / ALL / PP / NOT PP / ALL / PP / NOT PP
Waterwells / 69.9 / 55.6 / 72.5 / 3.4 / 3.4 / 3.4 / 2.4 / 2.5 / 2.4 / 3.1 / 3.3 / 3.1

PHONICS SCORES

% Achieving expected score
PHONICS SCORES / 2015 / 2016 / 2017 / COMMENTARY
YEAR 1
Waterwells cohort = 60 pupils (1 pupil = 1.7%) / 48 / 81 / All / PP/Service / Not PP/Service / Changes to teaching during 2015-2016 led to increased levels of challenge and expectation leading to significant increase in phonics scores 2016. Lower score in 2017 cohort specific (analysis shows high %SEN)
Current year 1 baseline for phonics highlights that results are expected to be higher in June 2018
71.6 / 53.8
(in total 11 PP pupils – 5 of which are SEN) / 80

END OF KS1 DATA

ATTAINMENT / PROGRESS R- KS1
Progress measure based on internal tracking from end of R to end of KS1
Expected = 6 / COMMENTARY
% working at expected or above levels (TA) / WATERWELLS
Robinswood Cohort = 60 pupils (1.7%) / ALL / PP/SERVICE / NOT PP/SERVICE / GLD for this cohort in 2015 = 48.7%
High levels of confidence in teacher assessment at end of R
(subject to external moderation)
READING / 81.4% / 5.7 / 5.7 / 5.7 / No significant differences between groups of pupils
WRITING / 67.8% / 5.8 / 5.7 / 5.8 / No significant differences between groups of pupils
MATHS / 83.1% / 6 / 5.8 / 6 / No significant differences between groups of pupils
Combined RWM / 66.1% / GLD = 48.7 / +14.4 / Progress: internal tracking shows pupils making expected progress from end of year R to end of year 2 in reading, writing and maths.

KEY STAGE 1 OUTCOMES: disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged

ATTAINMENT % achieving expected
READING / WRITING / MATHS / COMBINED R,Wr,M
ALL / PP / NOT PP / ALL / PP / NOT PP / ALL / PP / NOT PP / ALL / PP / NOT PP
Waterwells / 81.4 / 60 / 88.6 / 67.8 / 46.6 / 75 / 83.1 / 66.7 / 82.7 / 66.1 / 46.7 / 72.7
PROGRESS (expected = 6 )
READING / WRITING / MATHS
ALL / PP / NOT PP / ALL / PP / NOT PP / ALL / PP / NOT PP
Waterwells / 5.7 / 5.7 / 5.7 / 5.8 / 5.7 / 5.8 / 6 / 5.8 / 6

KEY STAGE 2 SATS (Percentages) 2017

% working at expected or above levels / WATERWELLS
TEACHER ASSESSMENTS
Robinswood Cohort =
20 pupils (1 pupil = 5%) / WATERWELLS
TEST RESULTS
Robinswood Cohort =
20 pupils (1 pupil = 5%) / NATIONAL 2017
TEST RESULTS / PROGRESS SCORE / COMMENTARY
Overall attainment for this cohort at KS1 in line with national average
Combined APS = 15.9
All / PP / Not PP
Reading / 75 / 80 / 71 / -0.7 / 0.3 / -1.5 / 93% of cohort achieved 2b+ in KS 1 SATS
Progress of disadvantaged pupils better than non-disadvantaged
Writing (TA) / 70 / 70 / 70 / -3.1 / -0.6 / -5.4 / 86.2% of cohort achieved 2b+ in KS1
Progress of disadvantaged pupils significantly better than non-disadvantaged
Maths / 70 / 85 / 75 / -1 / 0.4 / -2.2 / 86.6% of cohort achieved 2b+ in KS1
Progress of disadvantaged pupils better than non-disadvantaged
GPS / 90 / 77
Combined (reading writing and maths) / 61 / 65 / 61 / -1.6 / 0.03 / This overall negative score indicates thatpupils at WW on average did slightly less well at KS2 than those with similar prior attainment nationally.
However all pupils were assessed at the end of KS1 in other schools (Waterwells opened in September 2013) and internal baseline indicates that on the whole the prior assessments were quite high, in particular in writing.

KEY STAGE 2 OUTCOMES: disadvantaged vs non-disadvantaged

ATTAINMENT % achieving expected
READING / WRITING / MATHS / COMBINED R,Wr,M
ALL / PP / NOT PP / ALL / PP / NOT PP / ALL / PP / NOT PP / ALL / PP / NOT PP
Waterwells / 80 / 75 / 83.3 / 70 / 75 / 66.7 / 85 / 87.5 / 83.3 / 65 / 62.5 / 66.7
PROGRESS (=6)
READING / WRITING / MATHS
ALL / PP / NOT PP / ALL / PP / NOT PP / ALL / PP / NOT PP
Waterwells / -0.7 / 0.3 / -1.5 / -3.1 / -0.6 / -5.4 / -1 / 0.4 / -2.2