Options Analysis Table

Options analysis table

ution> / of solution>
Assessments / Attractiveness to customer / Attractiveness to agency / Attractiveness to all of government / Feasibility of business changes / Available capacity & capability / Complexity of solution / Certainty of solution / Expected costs
Rating
(Assessment note)
- see last page / low/med/high
(erence no) / low/med/high
(erence no) / low/med/high
(erence no) / low/med/high
(erence no) / low/med/high
(erence no) / low/med/high
(erence no) / low/med/high
(erence no) / low/med/high
(erence no)
Pros
Cons
ution> / of solution>
Assessments / Attractiveness to customer / Attractiveness to agency / Attractiveness to all of government / Feasibility of business changes / Available capacity & capability / Complexity of solution / Certainty of solution / Expected costs
Rating
(Assessment note)
- see last page / low/med/high
(erence no) / low/med/high
(erence no) / low/med/high
(erence no) / low/med/high
(erence no) / low/med/high
(erence no) / low/med/high
(erence no) / low/med/high
(erence no) / low/med/high
(erence no)
Pros
Cons
ution> / of solution>
Assessments / Attractiveness to customer / Attractiveness to agency / Attractiveness to all of government / Feasibility of business changes / Available capacity & capability / Complexity of solution / Certainty of solution / Expected costs
Rating
(Assessment note)
- see last page / low/med/high
(erence no) / low/med/high
(erence no) / low/med/high
(erence no) / low/med/high
(erence no) / low/med/high
(erence no) / low/med/high
(erence no) / low/med/high
(erence no) / low/med/high
(erence no)
Pros
Cons
ution> / of solution>
Assessments / Attractiveness to customer / Attractiveness to agency / Attractiveness to all of government / Feasibility of business changes / Available capacity & capability / Complexity of solution / Certainty of solution / Expected costs
Rating
(Assessment note)
- see last page / low/med/high
(erence no) / low/med/high
(erence no) / low/med/high
(erence no) / low/med/high
(erence no) / low/med/high
(erence no) / low/med/high
(erence no) / low/med/high
(erence no) / low/med/high
(erence no)
Pros
Cons
Assessment justification notes*
1. 

* place the number of the assessment justification as the (erence no) in the earlier tables.

Page 1 of 3