You Have to Be Careful How You Do This

FUN TIME

OK…now it’s time for you to do a little research and maybe you can learn a few tricks to save your Republic. Below is your road map and perhaps a remedy. You don’t have to be a lawyer or a legal researcher to do this simple task. All it takes is a desire to participate in saving your nation, liberty, freedom and restoration of the republic……

Continental or Territorial constitution?

You have to be careful how you do this.

Title 28 sec. sec. 15a is Oath to constitution for United States territorial municipal corporate government. It was created by statute under Pres. Lincoln.

Title 28, (15) "United States" means -
(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entityof the United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States.[today’s states]

Constitutional officers need a Public Official Bond and a subscribed Oath of Office in order to hold constitutional office.[the bond requirement was repealed years ago]

If requested by someone they represent or are served a document requesting proof they are a public official, the information should be made available to you. Is your public servant functioning under constitutional authority or is he functioning as a private Federal employee of the federal Municipal territorial government?

Are you losing your freedom by the legislation under color of law that he votes for? If he’s calling himself an officer of constitutional government make him prove it.

The crime of pretending to be another individual in order to deceive others and gain some advantage is actionable.

The crime of false impersonation is defined by federal statutes and by state statutes that differ from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. In some states, pretending to be someone who does not actually exist can constitute false impersonation. For example, suppose Bill attempts to evade prosecution for a crime by giving the arresting officer a fictitious name and address. In Colorado, where "[a] person who knowingly assumes a false or fictitious identity and, under that identity, does any other act intending unlawfully to gain a benefit for himself is guilty of criminal impersonation."

Speaking of Colorado, their statutes state that that no person holding “public employment” on the federal level is considered to be a public official, even the president, vice president, congressmen and senators.

If Bill could be charged with a crime (Colo. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 18-5-113(1) [West 1996]). In this situation, could someone masquerading as a public official also be charged? To be charged, the defendant does not need to seek a monetary benefit from the impersonation, however, I believe federal officials receive a handsome salary, great medical benefits, and a superior retirement package all paid for with taxpayer dollars. In fact, you just paid trillions to bail out AIG which managed the retirement package for Congress……

In New York, giving only a fictitious name does not constitute false impersonation. Under New York law, criminal impersonation is committed when an individual "[i]mpersonates another and does an act in such assumed character with intent to obtain a benefit or to injure or defraud another" (N.Y. Penal Law § 190.25 [McKinney 1996]). In other words, it is illegal to impersonate a real person, but not a fictitious one. Thus, if Carol forges Ann's name on checks made out to Ann so that Carol can cash the checks, Carol could be guilty of false impersonation — but only if Ann is a real person. Such laws are designed to protect innocent people from the losses they may incur owing to the wrongful acts of others and to restore any loss of dignity and reputation they may have suffered as a result of impersonation.

If you are a 14th amendment statutory fiction, can you commit a crime?

Most state laws also provide that the impersonation of a public official is a criminal act. In Texas, impersonating "a public servant with intent to induce another to submit to his pretended official authority or to rely on his pretended official acts" is a crime (Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 37.11 [West 1996]). Depending on the jurisdiction, the public servant being impersonated does not always have to actually exist. For example, suppose Carl pulls over a driver, shows her a fake police badge, and reprimands her for speeding but tells her that he will not arrest her if she pays him $50. Carl's actions constitute the crime of false impersonation, in addition to any other crimes, including extortion, [could a person claiming to be a federal public official in Colorado that votes for a tax increase be guilty of extortion]? That may apply to the situation. Thousands of criminal reports are filed every year by individuals victimized in various ways by persons impersonating police officers.

Under federal law, pretending to be "an officer or employee acting under the authority of the United States" in order to demand or obtain "any money, paper, document, or thing of value" can result in a fine as well as imprisonment for up to three years (18 U.S.C.A. § 912). Like state false impersonation statutes, the federal law also seeks to protect interests such as the dignity and prestige of individuals, especially those who hold federal office. Federal statutes also prohibit other types of impersonation, including pretending to be a U.S. citizen; pretending to be a U.S. officer or employee attempting to arrest or search a person or search a building; pretending to be a creditor of the United States or a foreign official; and pretending to be an agent or member of 4-H or of the Red Cross.

Remember: Freedom is never free! It's time we get the word out.

“PATRIOTISM IS NOT A SIN OR A CRIME.”

JUDICIAL BRANCH. EIGHT STATES EXCLUDE MEMBERS OF THE JUDICIAL BRANCH FROM THEIR DEFINITION OFPUBLIC OFFICIAL. THESE STATES ARE CALIFORNIA, IOWA, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, MISSISSIPPI, MONTANA, OKLAHOMA AND SOUTH CAROLINA, those South Carolina designates probate judges as public officials.

[IF JUDGES IN CALIFORNIA AREN’T CONSIDERED TO BE PUBLIC OFFICIALS, ARE THEIR RULINGS ON CASES THAT EFFECT YOUR LIFE VALID?]

Are you volunteering to obey?

Your silence is presumed to be Consent…

WITHDRAW YOUR CONSENT

MR AND MRS AMERICA…

IT’S TIME TO LEARN THE TRUTH ABOUT WHAT CALLS ITSELF GOVERNMENT…..AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE

Table for eachstate and each territory [LINK IS GOOD]

EX: Colorado

C.R.S. 24-6-203

(b) (I) As used in this section, the term "public office" means any office voted for in this state at any election.

(II) "Public office" does not include:

(A) The office of president or vice president of the United States;

(B) The office of senator or representative in the congress of the United States;

[looks like Colorado doesn’t have a President. No Obama care for you]

[can Obama be a real president of a real country if Colorado doesn’t consider him to be public official?]

WHAT DOES COLORADO KNOW THAT YOUR STATE DOESN’T KNOW?

(D) Any political party office in an assembly or convention, including delegates thereto; or

(E) Any elective office within a special district for which the annual compensation is less than twelve hundred dollars.

(III) "Public office" includes the office of governor, lieutenant governor, secretary of state, attorney general, state treasurer, state board of education, regents of the university of Colorado, the Colorado court of appeals, or the supreme court of Colorado.

(c) As used in this section, "statewide elected office" means the office of governor, lieutenant governor, secretary of state, attorney general, state treasurer, members of the state board of education, regents of the university of Colorado, members of the general assembly, or district attorneys.

WordNet: impersonation

Top

HomeLibraryLiterature & LanguageWordNet

Note: click on a word meaning below to see its connections and related words.

The noun has 3 meanings:

Meaning #1: a representation of a person that is exaggerated for comic effect
Synonyms: caricature, imitation

Meaning #2: pretending to be another person
Synonym: imposture

Meaning #3: imitating the mannerisms of another person
Synonym: personation

CITE

18 USC Sec. 912 01/08/2008

EXPCITE

TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

PART I - CRIMES

CHAPTER 43 - FALSE PERSONATION

HEAD

Sec. 912. Officer or employee of the United States

STATUTE

Whoever falsely assumes or pretends to be an officer or employee acting under the authority of the United States or any department, agency or officer thereof, and acts as such, or in such pretended

character demands or obtains any money, paper, document, or thing of value, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

SOURCE

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 742; Pub. L. 103-322, title

XXXIII, Sec. 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Secs. 76 and 123 (Mar. 4,

1909, ch. 321, Secs. 32 and 66, 35 Stat. 1095, 1100; Feb. 28, 1938,

ch. 37, 52 Stat. 82).

Section consolidates sections 76 and 123 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed. The effect of this consolidation was to increase the punishment for revenue officers from $500 to $1,000 and from 2 years to 3 years, and to rephrase in the alternative the mandatory

punishment provision.

This section now applies the same punishment to all officers and agents of the United States found guilty of false personation.

Words "agency or" were inserted to eliminate any possible ambiguity as to scope of section. (See definitive section 6 of this title.) Other words referring to "authority of any corporation owned or controlled by the United States" were omitted for the same reason. (See Pierce v. U.S., 1941, 62 S. Ct. 237, 314 U.S. 306, 86 . Ed. 226.)

The words "with the intent to defraud the United States or any person", contained in said section 76 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., were omitted as meaningless in view of United States v. Lapowich, 63 S. Ct. 914.

Changes were made in phraseology.

AMENDMENTS

1994 - Pub. L. 103-322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $1,000".

December 26th 1933 49 Statute 3097 Treaty Series 881 (Convention on Rights and Duties of States) statedCONGRESS replaced STATUTESwith international law, placing all states under international law.

 December 9th 1945 International Organization Immunities Act relinquished every public office of the United States to the United Nations.

 22 CFR 92.12-92.31 FR Heading “Foreign Relationship” states that an oath is required to take office.

 Title 8 USC 1481 stated once an oath of office is taken citizenship is relinquished, thus you become a foreign entity, agency, or state. That means every public office is a foreign state, including all political subdivisions. (i.e. every single court is considered a separate foreign entity)

 Title 22 USC (Foreign Relations and Intercourse) Chapter 11 identifies all public officials as foreign agents.

· Title 28 USC 3002 Section 15A states that the United States is a Federal Corporation and not a Government, including the Judiciary Procedural Section.

· Federal Rules of Civil Procedure(FRCP) 4j states thattheCourt jurisdiction and immunity fall undera foreign State.

· The 11th Amendment states ”The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of an Foreign State.” (A foreign entity, agency, or state cannot bring any suit against a United States citizen without abiding the following procedure.)

 Title 22 CFR 93.1-93.2 states that the Department of State has to be notified of any suit, and in turn has to notify the United States citizen of said suit.

Title 28 USC 1330 states that the United States District Court has to grant permission for the suit to be pursued once the court has been supplied sufficient proof that the United States citizen is actually a corporate entity.

Title 28 USC 1608 I have Absolute Immunity as a Corporation

Title 28 USC 1602-1611 (Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act) allows the jurisdiction of a court to be challenged, and a demand of proper jurisdiction to be stated.

July 27th 1868 15 Statutes at Large Chapter 249 Section 1 “Acts Concerning American Citizens in a Foreign State”, expatriation, is what is broken when jurisdiction is demanded, and it is not met with an answer.

Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12b 6 the prosecution has failed to provide adequate proof that the parties involved in this situation are actually corporate entities. I have provided ample proof that the prosecution and other agents are actually corporations.

1950 81st Congress Investigated the Lawyers Guild and determined that the B.A.R. Association was founded and run by communists under definition. Thus any elected official that is a member of the B.A.R. will only be loyal to the B.A.R. and not the people.