INTERNAL EVALUATION TOOLS 517543-LLP-2011-DK-KA2-KA2MP

Partner: UPVDate: August 2012

Period covered by this review: 1 Jan. 2012 to 30Jun. 2012

Please complete this form to record the activities and progress in the period.

Communication:
Which partners have you had communications with?
How often and in which way have you communicated with partners? / Communication has taken place regularly with all partners in the project, specially through:
a)the 3-day launch meeting in Brussels in January 2012
b)the e-mail discussion list
Basically regarding Clilstore design issues, providing feedback on tool development issues and workshop.
Innovatory aspects:
Describe any innovatory aspects to your activities. / Mobile site testing with iPhone and iPad. Testing suggested software such as iPadio for audio recording on iPads.
Management:
Do you feel that information relating to the management of the project is sufficient, relevant and effective? (Please comment).
Give a rating on a scale of 5 to 1.
5 being the most positive. / Yes, management-wise the project is very efficient. Having all relevant project documents on the project website is extremely useful. Also, having been given a copy of all the necessary administrative documents in a USB drive at the start of the project has also been very helpful for organisational matters.
Rating: 5
Dissemination:
List of dissemination activities you have been engaged in. / -Uploading project info onto EURODIS dissemination database

-Presentation of project to colleagues from the Applied Linguistics Department, UPV
-Link of TOOLS project website to personal UPV website

-Project info disseminated through EUROCALL account in LinkedIn
-Project info disseminated through EUROCALL account on Facebook
External impact/mainstreams:
Any multiplier effect/impact. / UPV has an open repository of educational videos in a system called Politube. All of the language learning videos posted there may be exploited educationally in Clilstore

Overall comment: / The enthusiasm and commitment of all the partners to the project is admirable. This is basically due to the driving force of the project coordinator, Kent Andersen 
Summary of Local Activities in the period:
-Translation of project dissemination leaflet into Spanish.
-Dissemination activities, particularly through digital means.
Milestones met:
-Dissemination of project locally
-Dissemination of project through personal UPV website
-Dissemination of projectthrough the EURODIS website
-Dissemination of project through the EUROCALL account on Facebook
-Dissemination of project through the EUROCALL account on LinkedIn
Delays (if any) in planned activities and outputs:
If applicable how will the team compensate for the delays and catch up:
Other comments:
It’s very helpful to have a Dropbox account for the project and to be able to jointly build upon project documents.
Working on the project is a very enjoyable experience 

Partnership progress review Page 1 of 2