Referee's Report Form

REVIEWER’SREPORTFORM

AUTHOR(S):……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

TITLE OF ARTICLE/PAPER:………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

REVIEWER (NAME AND AFFILIATIONS):……………………………………………………………………......

№ / Accordance with Editorial policy / YES / NO
1. / The article/paper is not published in another journal/conference in his country or abroad. (originality) / □ / □
2. / If the article/paper incorporates text passages, figures, data or other material from the works of others, they are clearly identifying the original source (anti plagiarism). Preliminary plagiarism checking, using at least one of the following free checkers: or similar. / □ / □
3. / Absence of discrimination. The article/paper is consistent with the requirement of non-discrimination is / □ / □

Please rate all of the following questions and the overall recommendation.(please mark with “X” your opinion.)

General Judgment / Poor A / Below Average B / Average C / Good D / Very Good F
1. / Is author familiar with the existing state of research? / □ / □ / □ / □ / □
2. / Does the content fit within the scope of HiTECH 2018 / □ / □ / □ / □ / □
3. / Is it a new and original contribution? / □ / □ / □ / □ / □
4. / Is title appropriate? / □ / □ / □ / □ / □
5. / Are abstract and keywords adequate? / □ / □ / □ / □ / □
6. / Is the presentation of material structured and organized in a logical fashion? / □ / □ / □ / □ / □
7. / Does the paper provide appropriate thought-provoking conclusions from the work and information presented? / □ / □ / □ / □ / □
8. / Is the text written using correct style of the English language? / □ / □ / □ / □ / □
9. / Are all figures, tables and photographs of acceptable quality for publication in a research journal? / □ / □ / □ / □ / □
10. / Are relevant references cited in appropriate places in the text? Is an adequate list of references provided at the end of the text? / □ / □ / □ / □ / □
11. / Rating of this paper in comparison to similar papers published in top-rated scientific journals: / □ / □ / □ / □ / □

Overall recommendation. (please mark with “X” your opinion.)

Overall recommendation / YES / NO
Acceptable without any changes / □ / □
Acceptable with minor modifications / □ / □
Major revision: needs to be re-written and re-evaluated / □ / □
Unacceptable / □ / □

REVIEWER’S COMMENTS

Please give detailed comments to justify your general judgment and recommendation.

Confidential comments to theProgramme Committee of HiTECH 2018

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Comments and suggestions for the Author(s)

Date:XX.XX.XXXX

Place:…………………………..

Signature:

1/2