1

LIS781: Scholarly Communicationsand Electronic Publishing
Palmer School of Library and Information Science

Long Island University/C.W.Post
Spring 2012 (January-May)

Proposed 3 Credit ONLINECourse and FinalDraft

Instructors: John J. Regazzi and Selenay Aytac / Office: LIB
E-mail: ; / Office Hours:Wednesday ET 4-6pm
Friday ET 9-5pm
(by appointment with Skype)
Tel: 516-741 2177; 516-299 3443 / Classroom: BLACKBOARD

This course will look at the historic and current trends in the scientific, technical, and medical publishing (STM) industry. Particular emphasis will be given to understanding the changes that are occurring in the electronic dissemination of scholarly information and how libraries and other information organizations will need to manage these changes. Scholarly communication genre and its underlying components will be discussed. Some of the web-based scholarly collaboration and communication tools will be examined. The course is intended to be highly interactive, including online discussions as well as the analysis of several industry case studies.

TECHNOLOGY

Working knowledge of basic computer applications – word processors, spreadsheets, database management systems and ability to access e-Learning platform, particularly Blackboard.
COURSE OBJECTIVES
Understand the key trends in ePublishing and see how information repositories are influencing and being affected by these trends

  • Identify the changing nature of scholarly communications, both in terms of its form and genre
  • Explore the underlying economics of scholarly communications, alternative publishing and libraries roles in this economy.
  • Identify the changing user requirements of scholars in their use of formal information systems and being familiar with the current web-based scholarly communication tools
  • Understand the shifts that are occurring in the scholarly community in the production and dissemination of scientific, technical, and medical information.
  • Identify the major legal issues surrounding the profession of librarianship and the management of library systems in terms of scholarly communication– including intellectual freedom, ethics and the role of professional organizations.

PALMER SCHOOL OBJECTIVES MET BY THIS COURSE

  1. Reflect the principles, ethics and philosophy of the profession while serving their patrons, institutions and communities: analyze and apply legal, social, economic, technological, and global policies and trends affecting libraries and information organizations and the profession;
  2. Deliver user-centered services and cost-effective programs tailored to the needs of increasingly diverse populations: develop and deliver information programs designed to meet the needs of specific users and communities
  3. Staff, manage and lead libraries and information centers of all types: explain and apply management principles, processes and practices including those relating to innovation and strategic planning as well as human resources, financial, and operational functions of a library or other type of information organization

DELIVERY METHODS
ONLINE, 3 credit graduate Course, Asynchronous course delivery using Blackboard. Online lecturing and podcasts through Blackboard. Please contact to C.W.Post technology Office at (516) 299-3636 or email to if you have any question.

Online demonstrations of Web of Science, Google Scholar, JSTORE, CITE, researcher ID, etc.

CONTACT HOURS

3 hrs./week lecture x 15 weeks = 45 hours lecture/reading course presentations

6 hrs./week supplementary reading /assignments* = 84 hours

2 hr./week participation in online discussions/doing research = 28 hours

Total= 157 hours of instruction + supplementary assignments + Research + Participating Online Discussions

* supplementary reading /assignments consist of

Readings= 2 hours

Research Project= 2 hours

Assignments= 2 hours

COURSE EXPECTATIONS

  • This course heavily involves student participation
  • You are expected to participate in all onlinesessions in this course.
  • Use one of the citing styles (please be consistent) to list sources in your projects or papers; for more information please visit: (
  • Please be advised of C.W. Post Academic Conduct Policy:The Academic Conduct Policy of the C.W. Post Campus promotes an academic community characterized by respect, honesty, originality, and fairness. Academic misconduct such as plagiarism, cheating, fabrication, sabotage or assisting someone in the committing of any of the acts, is a violation of this Policy. Any student found engaging in academic misconduct is subject to disciplinary action.
  • Plagiarism is a practice that is not only unacceptable, but which is to be condemned in the strongest terms possible on the basis of moral, educational and legal grounds. Under University policy, plagiarism may be punishable by a range of penalties up to and including failure in the course and expulsion from the University." (Long Island University, Graduate Bulletin 2005-2007, p.108) For more information please visit at
  • Please be advised that IRB approval is required if human subjects are involved in student research activities include, but are not limited to, class projects, final papers, masterstheses, or doctoral dissertations. For more information please visit at

COPYRIGHT GUIDELINES

Please feel free to post a URL to a Web site of interest in the discussions or Blog, but do not post any copyrighted material in any online classroom discussions or Blog without the express permission of the copyright owner.

ATTENDANCE

Please remember that the course attendance will be taken electronically through your participation in postings each week. Postings will be required - at least one message posting for every course discussion and each required reading during the consecutive course schedule. You are expected to participate in the online class discussions in a substantive way by posting at least one or two substantive notes in order to meet attendance requirements. Please also respond your classmates’ posts constructively and professionally.

READINGS

Most of the required readings are linked in the Blackboard. You will be also advised to read some additional course materials (optional) which will be listed in the syllabus.

ASSIGNMENTS
The Final Grade for the course will be made up of the following: (1) Final project--30% Students will have an opportunity to carry out a research project and present it (Doctoral students and MLS holders may replace the final project with a research paper); and (2) Attendance and Participation--20%; (3) cases—30% to assess the online sessions productivity. These three assignmentsshould be submitted after the completion of Online Blackboard sessions, (4) Final take home exam--20%.

More details on the assignments will be provided in class.

GRADING

A / 4.00
A- / 3.67
B+ / 3.33
B / 3.00
B- / 2.67
C+ / 2.33
C / 2.00
C- / 1.67
D / 1.00 (UNDERGRADUATE ONLY)
F / 0.00

SCHEDULE AND READINGS

Overview of the Industry

January 17, 2012–Overview of Course Syllabus

Readings:

  1. Kling, Rob, and Ewa Callahan. "Electronic Journals, the Internet, and Scholarly Communication." In Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, vol. 37, ed. Blaise Cronin, 127-177. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc., 2002.
  2. The implications of information technology for scientific journal publishing [electronic resource] : a literature review / Amy Friedlander and Rändi S. Bessette, Arlington, VA : Division of Science Resources Statistics, Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences, National Science Foundation, [2003] Available at:
  1. Pochoda, Phil. "Scholarly Publication at the Digital Tipping Point." Journal of Electronic Publishing 11, no. 2 (2008).

January 24, 2012 –Historical Overview

Readings:

  1. Besser, Howard. "Digital Image Distribution: A Study of Costs and Uses." D-Lib Magazine 5 (October 1999).
  2. Bide, Mark, Charles Oppenheim, and Anne Ramsden. "Charging Mechanisms for Digitized Texts." Learned Publishing 11 (April 1998): 109-118.
  3. Lynch, Clifford. "Shape of the Scientific Article in the Developing Cyberinfrastructure." CTWatch Quarterly 3, no. 3 (2007).

January 31, 2012 –Shifting Sands

Readings:

  1. Björk, B-C. andHolmstrom, J. 2006. Benchmarking scientific journals from the submitting author’s viewpoint. Learned Publishing, 19: 147-55.
  2. Tyckosom, David A. 1992. Eugene Garfield’s contribution to bibliography: science citation index. In Distinguished classics of reference publishing.Edited by James Rettig Oryx Press. Pp. 234-241.
  3. Schroter, S. 2005. Perception of open access publishing: interviews with journal authors. British Medical Journal, 330: 756.
  4. Digital scholarship in the tenure, promotion, and review process. 2004. Edited by Deborah Lines Andersen. Armonk, N.Y. : M.E. Sharpe.

Understanding and analyzing current ePublishing Market demands

February 7, 2012 –Slippery Slope (Britannica)

Readings:

  1. The Britannica case study reading (Please log in to Blackboard and click on “Case Studies and Questions” link)
  2. Regazzi, John J and Selenay Aytac. 2007. Author-perceived quality characteristics of science, technology and medicine (STM) journals, Brighton : Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers.
  3. Regazzi, J. J. and Caliguiri, N. A. 2006. Publisher and author partnerships: a changing landscape. Learned Publishing, 19: 183-92.

February 14, 2012 –What do Researcher Want

Readings:

  1. Tibbitts, Gordon. (2006). Measuring quality in journal publishing: new and emerging methods, Available at
  1. Tibbitts, G. 2006. Measuring quality in journal publishing: new and emerging methods. Presentation at International Academy of Nurse Editors conference, London, August 2003. Available at
  2. Saha, S. et al. (2003). Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? Journal of the Medical Library Association 91: 42-6. Available at

Additional Reading:

  1. Bensman, Stephen J. 2007. Garfield and the impact factorpp.93-125. In ARIST vol. 41.?Edited by Blaise Cronin. Medford, Information Today.

February 21, 2012 –Managing Scholarly Communications

Readings:

  1. King, C.J. et al. Scholarly communication: academic values and sustainable models. Berkeley CA, Center for Studies in Higher Education, 2006. Available at
  2. Willinsky, John. "Scholarly Associations and the Economic Viability of Open Access Publishing." Journal of Digital information 4, no. 2 (2003).
  3. ———. "The Stratified Economics of Open Access." Economic Analysis and Policy 39, no. 1 (2009): 53-70.
  4. Porter, Michael E. Competitive strategy:techniques for analyzing industries and competitors, New York: Free Press, 1980.

Additional Readings:

  1. Garfield, E. 1955. Citation indexes to science: a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122: 108-11.

Alternative Scholarly Publishing Models

February 28, 2012 –Innovation: Second Life

Readings:

  1. Second Life case study reading (Please log in to Blackboard and click on “Case Studies and Questions” link)
  2. Bennett, Scott. "Just-in-Time Scholarly Monographs." The Journal of Electronic Publishing 4, no. 1 (1998).
  3. Dietrich, Dianne. "Automated Metadata Formatting for Cornell's Print-on-Demand Books." The Code4Lib Journal, no. 8 (2009).

March 6, 2012 –Economic Models and New Entrants

Readings:

  1. Rowlands, I. and Nicholas, D. New journal publishing models: an international survey of senior researchers. London, CIBER, 2005. Available at
  2. Nisonger, T. E. 2007. Journals in the core collection: Definition, identification, and applications. The Serials Librarian, 51(3-4), 51-73.

March 13, 2012-- Spring Recess - No Classes

March 20, 2012 –How are Researchers Using Information Today

Readings:

  1. Rowlands, I. et al. Scholarly Communication in the digital environment: what do authors want? London, CIBER, 2004. Available at:
  2. Goebel, Ralf, and Sebastian Meyer. "The DFG Viewer for Interoperability in Germany." Liber Quarterly: The Journal of European Research Libraries 19, no. 3/4 (2010).

Changing user behaviors and the products that drive these

March 27, 2012 –Changing User Behaviors

Overcoming barriers: access to research information | Research Information Network

Readings:

  1. Giesecke, Joan R., Beth McNeil, and Gina L. B. Minks. "Electronic Text Centers: Creating Research Collections on a Limited Budget, the Nebraska Experience." Journal of Library Administration 31, no. 2 (2000): 77-92.
  2. Biswas, Goutam, and Dibyendu Paul. "An Evaluative Study on the Open Source Digital Library Softwares for Institutional Repository: Special Reference to DSpace and Greenstone Digital Library." International Journal of Library and Information Science 2, no. 1 (2010): 1-10.
  3. Nisonger, T. E., & Davis, C. H. (2005). The perception of library and information science journals by LIS education deans and ARL library directors: A replication of the Kohl-Davis study. College & Research Libraries, 66(4), 341-377.

April 3, 2012 –Scopus, Web of Knowledge

Readings:

  1. Cyburt, Richard H., Sam M. Austin, Timothy C. Beers, Alfredo Estrade, Ryan M. Ferguson, Alexander Sakharuk, Hendrik Schatz, Karl Smith, and Scott Warren. "The Virtual Journals of the Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics." D-Lib Magazine 16, no. 1/2 (2010).
  2. Nicholas, Nick, Nigel Ward, and Kerry Blinco. "Abstract Modelling of Digital Identifiers." Ariadne, no. 62 (2010).
  3. Sommer, Dorothea. "Persistent Identifiers: The 'URN Granular' Project of the German National Library and the University and State Library Halle." Liber Quarterly: The Journal of European Research Libraries 19, no. 3/4 (2010).

April 10, 2012 –Current Trends-Social Nets, Semantic Tagging

Readings:

  1. Bauer, Kathleen, and Nisa Bakkalbasi. "An Examination of Citation Counts in a New Scholarly Communication Environment." D-Lib Magazine 11, no. 9 (2005).
  2. Electronic publishing plus :media for a technological future. 1985. Edited by Martin Greenberger.Washington, D.C.] :Washington Program--Annenberg School of Communications ;White Plains, N.Y. :Knowledge Industry Publications.

April 17, 2012 --Shared learnings: Presentation and Discussion of Student Papers (Uploading individual papers and presentations to Blackboard for peer-review of your cohorts

Class Presentations

April 24, 2012 --Shared learnings: Presentation and Discussion of Student Papers

May 1st, 2012 – Final Take Home Exam

1