Aug 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/0000r0
IEEE P802.11
Wireless LANs
Date: 2006-08-10
Author(s):
Name / Company / Address / Phone / email
Naveen K Kakani / Nokia / 6021 Connection Dr, Irving TX 75038 /
August 9th 2006 : TGn Teleconference
Participants: Arnaud, Joseph Levy, Naveen, Bruce, Kaberi, Harkirat Singh, Ali, Adrian, Douglas Chan
PSMP Adhoc session
a) Comment resolution : Document 0687/r23
- Visited all the comments in the document 0687/r23 that don’t have any entry in “Resn Status” column (N)
- Re-visited the CID’s where members of TGn suggested a change in “Resn Status”
- Agreed to put the comments with “A”, “R”, “C”, “W” resn status and “Duplicates” to motion at the start of TGn session in Melbourne
- Adhoc chair will post 0687/r24 which has a separate tab (PSMP Motion 2) for the CID’s that will be covered by the motion
- Adhoc chair to start a straw poll on the reflector to check the preference of TGn WG members if it is better to change PSMP Frame to a control frame. The straw poll will include the pros and cons of having PSMP as a control frame
2) Document 0908/r0 was presented to resolve CID 3427. This is related to PSMP recovery frame
Discussion:
- What should AP do after transmitting PSMP frame and there is no response from STA ?
o There is no rule in the spec that limits AP on how to use ULT
- Change text to 8pt font
- Remove all the IFS symbols in the picture except PIFS
- Change the size of DL boxes and delete MTBA in UL boxes
- Add a reference for the new Figure in the text
- Add symbols to the figure / text to indicate how the startoffsets of ULT’s following to PSMP recovery frame are related to their startoffsets as indicated in PSMP frame
Submission page 1 Naveen K Kakani.