MM/LD/WG/8/3
page 1
E
MM/LD/WG/8/3.
OriGINAL: English
DATE: May 28, 2010
WORKING GROUP ON THE LEGAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE MADRID SYSTEM FOR THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS
Eighth Session
Geneva, July 5 to 9, 2010
STATISTICAL INFORMATION RELATED TO THE OPERATIONS OF THE INTERNATIONAL BUREAU
Document prepared by the International Bureau
1.The Working Group on the Legal Development of the Madrid System for the International Registration of Marks (hereinafter referred to as “the Working Group”)concluded its sixth session with a request that the Secretariat preparea document assessing, in the absence of the requirement of a basic mark, the tasks that would be required to be performed with respect to the filing of an international application, and by whom. Furthermore, the Working Group requested that, in order to establish a context for discussions, the document would contain, where available, statistical data relating to operational aspects of the work carried out by the International Bureau[*].
2.The purpose of this document is to present to the Working Group such statistical data. In order to facilitate the analysis of the data, it is being presented to the Working Group in this separate document, which has been prepared as a complement to the document assessing the tasks that would be required to be performed in the absence of the requirement of a basic mark (document MM/LD/WG/8/2), which is also now before the Working Group.
3.The data is contained in the Annex to this document in the form of a statistical summary concerning the operations undertaken by the International Bureau in the framework of the Madrid system for the
year 2009. Nevertheless, in order to provide a wider perspective, information concerning previous years, where available, has also been provided.
4.The Annex comprises three sections. The first section presents information concerning the filing of international applications before the International Bureau. The following section introduces data relating to the processing of international applications undertaken by the International Bureau. Finally, the third section provides information concerning the management of international registrations by the International Bureau, while also providing some logistical data.
5.The Working Group is invited to consider the above and to note thecontents of the Annex to this document.
[Annex follows]
MM/LD/WG/8/3
Annex, page 1
MM/LD/WG/8/3
ANNEX
Statistical summary concerning the operations undertaken by the International Bureau in the framework of the Madrid system
Section I
Statistical data concerning the filing of international applications
1.Filing medium and languages
In the year 2009, the International Bureau received 35,848 international applications*.[†] Of these, roughly 37 percent (13,423) were received electronically, which continued an increasing trend in the number of applications filed through that medium since its introduction to the Madrid system in 1998 (see Graph A). Approximately, 72 percent of those applications were filed in English (25,833), 25 percent in French (9,005) and almost 3 percent in Spanish (1,010) (see Graph B). This means that a total of 71,696 translations were undertaken by the International Bureau in respect of international applications filed in 2009 (see Table I).
Graph A
International Trademark Applications
- Filing Medium -
Graph B
International Trademark Applications
- Filing Language -
Table I
Translation of International Trademark Applications
2004 / 2005 / 2006 / 2007 / 2008 / 2009Into English / 13,722 / 13,759 / 14,495 / 14,716 / 14,886 / 10,015
Into French / 16,176 / 20,526 / 22,834 / 26,024 / 28,208 / 26,843
Into Spanish / 29,048 / 32,877 / 35,663 / 39,190 / 41,046 / 34,838
Total / 58,946 / 67,162 / 72,992 / 79,930 / 84,140 / 71,696
2.Representation
In 2009, a representative had been appointed in connection with the filing of almost 82 percent of all the applications received by the International Bureau. This percentage has shown no significant variation since 2005 (see Table II).
Table II
International Trademark Applications
-Representation -
2005 / 2006 / 2007 / 2008 / 2009Applications received / 33,581 / 36,496 / 39,965 / 42,070 / 35,848
Representative Appointed / 27,656 / 30,152 / 33,086 / 35,492 / 29,292
% / 82% / 83% / 83% / 84% / 82%
3.Top Offices of origin
As Offices of origin, the Offices filing the highest number of international applications in 2009 were the Offices of Germany, the European Union, France, the United States of America, Switzerland, Benelux, Italy, China, Japan, the Russian Federation, Austria, the United Kingdom and Australia (see Table III).
Table III
International Trademark Applications
- Office of Origin -
2002 / 2003 / 2004 / 2005 / 2006 / 2007 / 2008 / 2009DE / 5,126 / 5,559 / 5,395 / 5,803 / 5,663 / 6,100 / 6,214 / 4,793
EM / 354 / 1,852 / 2,445 / 3,384 / 3,600 / 4,367
FR / 3,609 / 3,331 / 3,518 / 3,497 / 3,705 / 3,930 / 4,218 / 3,523
US / 139 / 1,737 / 2,849 / 3,148 / 3,741 / 3,684 / 3,201
CH / 2,531 / 2,189 / 2,133 / 2,235 / 2,468 / 2,656 / 2,885 / 2,671
BX / 2,467 / 2,189 / 2,482 / 2,426 / 2,639 / 2,508 / 2,668 / 1,968
IT / 1,800 / 1,915 / 2,499 / 2,340 / 2,958 / 2,664 / 2,763 / 1,876
CN / 241 / 472 / 1,015 / 1,334 / 1,328 / 1,444 / 1,584 / 1,358
JP / 242 / 394 / 692 / 893 / 847 / 985 / 1,278 / 1,312
RU / 276 / 502 / 575 / 605 / 622 / 891 / 1,190 / 1,068
AT / 982 / 861 / 1,181 / 1,191 / 1,117 / 1,135 / 1,245 / 1,050
GB / 670 / 674 / 917 / 1,016 / 1,055 / 1,178 / 1,162 / 1,007
AU / 222 / 340 / 683 / 852 / 1,100 / 1,169 / 1,092 / 1,000
OTHER / 4,985 / 5,314 / 6,292 / 6,688 / 7,401 / 8,180 / 8,487 / 6,654
TOTAL / 23,151 / 23,879 / 29,473 / 33,581 / 36,496 / 39,965 / 42,070 / 35,848
4.Designations
A total of 267,333 designations were included in new applications filed in 2009, which represents an average of 7.46 designations per international application. This would suggest that, while the number of international applications shows an increasing trend, this might bedriven by applications and registrations with relatively fewer designations
(see Table IV). The Contracting Parties which were designated the most in 2009 were China, the Russian Federation, the United States of America, Switzerland, the European Union, Japan, Australia, Ukraine, Turkey, the Republic of Korea, Norway, Croatia and Singapore
(see Table V).
Table IV
International Trademark Applications
- Average Number of Designations per Application -
2002 / 2003 / 2004 / 2005 / 2006 / 2007 / 2008 / 2009Designations / 283,365 / 290,870 / 298,200 / 356,539 / 364,725 / 267,283 / 334,598 / 267,333
Applications / 23,151 / 23,879 / 29,473 / 33,581 / 36,496 / 39,965 / 42,070 / 35,848
Average / 12.24 / 12.18 / 10.12 / 10.62 / 9.99 / 6.69 / 7.95 / 7.46
Table V
International Trademark Applications
- Number of Designations per Contracting Party -
2002 / 2003 / 2004 / 2005 / 2006 / 2007 / 2008 / 2009CN / 6,684 / 7,106 / 9,265 / 13,575 / 15,801 / 16,676 / 17,829 / 14,766
RU / 8,312 / 9,006 / 9,940 / 12,813 / 14,432 / 15,455 / 16,768 / 14,150
US / 238 / 7,109 / 11,863 / 13,994 / 14,618 / 15,715 / 13,406
CH / 10,577 / 10,174 / 10,137 / 13,197 / 14,260 / 14,528 / 14,907 / 13,161
EM / 114 / 6,309 / 10,640 / 12,744 / 14,502 / 12,564
JP / 5,323 / 5,359 / 7,071 / 10,104 / 11,844 / 12,348 / 12,748 / 10,386
AU / 3,905 / 4,683 / 5,917 / 7,989 / 9,115 / 9,848 / 10,529 / 8,575
UA / 5,280 / 6,262 / 6,361 / 8,271 / 9,057 / 9,751 / 10,635 / 8,539
TR / 5,458 / 5,878 / 6,272 / 8,602 / 8,958 / 9,377 / 3,844 / 7,942
KR / 1,694 / 4,852 / 7,160 / 8,334 / 8,988 / 9,539 / 7,755
NO / 6,967 / 6,582 / 6,821 / 8,443 / 9,102 / 9,346 / 9,787 / 7,627
HR / 4,743 / 5,054 / 5,298 / 6,716 / 6,970 / 7,059 / 7,482 / 5,967
SG / 3,547 / 3,708 / 4,451 / 6,127 / 6,717 / 7,005 / 7,607 / 5,957
OTHER / 222,569 / 232,232 / 214,592 / 235,370 / 225,501 / 119,540 / 182,706 / 136,538
TOTAL / 283,365 / 290,870 / 298,200 / 356,539 / 364,725 / 267,283 / 334,598 / 267,333
5.Irregularities
Over 34 percent of the international applications received during the
year 2008 (14,414) and over 30 percent of the international applications received in 2009 (10,981) presented one or more irregularity. This represents a slight decrease, in relative terms, with respect to the previous years (see Table VI).
Table VI
International Trademark Applications
- Irregularities -
Applications / Error / WithYear / Received / Free / Errors / %
2008 / 42,070 / 27,656 / 14,414 / 34.26
2009 / 35,848 / 24,867 / 10,981 / 30.63
6.In 2008, the International Bureau sent 16,070 letters of irregularity, of which30 per cent (4,808) concerned irregularities only with respect to fees, 26 per cent (4,098) concerned irregularities only with respect to the indication of goods and/or services (Rule 13), 25 per cent (3,972) concerned multiple irregularities, 10 per cent (1,678) concerned irregularities only with respect to the classification of goods and/or services (Rule 12) and 9 per cent (1,514) concerned only one other type of irregularity (see Table VII). Furthermore, the International Bureau had to reclassify the goods and/or services in over 22 percent (9,376) of the total number of international applications received (see Table VIII and
Graph C).
7.In 2009, the International Bureau sent 11,415 letters of irregularity, of which35 per cent (3,966) concerned irregularities only with respect to fees, 24 per cent (2,704) concerned irregularities only with respect to the indication of goods and/or services (Rule 13), 21 per cent (2,424) concerned more than one irregularity, almost 11 per cent (1,210) concerned only one other type of irregularity and slightly less than 10 per cent (1,111) concerned irregularities only with respect to the classification of goods and/or services (Rule 12) (see Table VII). In addition, the International Bureau had to reclassify the goods and/or services in over
16 per cent (5,969) of the total number of international applications received (see Table VIII and Graph D).
Table VII
Letters of Irregularities
- Type of Irregularity -
Rule 12 / Rule 13 / Fees / OtherYear / Letters / only / only / only / only / Multiple
2008 / 16,070 / 1,678 / 4,098 / 4,808 / 1,514 / 3,972
2009 / 11,415 / 1,111 / 2,704 / 3,966 / 1,210 / 2,424
Table VIII
International Trademark Applications
- Reclassification of Goods and/or Services by the International Bureau -
Requests / RequestsYear / received / Reclassified / %
2008 / 42,070 / 9,376 / 22.28
2009 / 35,848 / 5,969 / 16.65
Graph C
Letters of Irregularities 2008
- Type of Irregularity -
Graph D
Letters of Irregularities 2009
- Type of Irregularity -
Section II
Statistical data concerning the processing of international applications
8.As previously noted, the International Bureau received
35,848 international trademark applications in 2009. Over 98 percent of thosefilings have arrived at a conclusion, in the sense that an application has resulted either in an international registration or it has been declared abandoned (see Table IX).
Table IX
International Bureau
- International Applications Processed -
Year / Total / Resolved / %2006 / 36,496 / 36,496 / 100%
2007 / 39,965 / 39,965 / 100%
2008 / 42,070 / 42,051 / 99.9%
2009 / 35,848 / 35,253 / 98.3%
9.Of the total number of international trademark applications handled by the International Bureau in 2009, almost 70 per cent (24,867) resulted in a registration without the notification of any irregularity. This indicates a slightly improving trend compared to previous years (see Table X). Almost 25 per cent of those international applications (8,805) resulted in a registration even after an irregularity had been notified (see Table XI), while over 4 per cent (1,581) were considered abandoned (see Table XII).
Table X
International Bureau
- Regular Registrations -
Year / Total / Regular Registration / %2006 / 36,496 / 22,748 / 62.3%
2007 / 39,965 / 25,565 / 64.0%
2008 / 42,070 / 27,656 / 65.7%
2009 / 35,848 / 24,867 / 69.4%
Table XI
International Bureau
- Registration after Irregularity -
Year / Total / Registration afterIrregularity / %
2006 / 36,496 / 12,537 / 34.3%
2007 / 39,965 / 13,041 / 32.6%
2008 / 42,070 / 13,190 / 31.3%
2009 / 35,848 / 8,805 / 24.6%
Table XII
International Bureau
- International Applications Abandoned -
Year / Total / Abandoned / %2006 / 36,496 / 1,214 / 3.33%
2007 / 39,965 / 1,361 / 3.41%
2008 / 42,070 / 1,205 / 2.86%
2009 / 35,848 / 1,581 / 4.41%
10.As of March 2010, 595applications filed in 2009, 1.7 per cent of the total number of applications filed,are still awaiting resolution. These correspondto 27 international applications still pending examination by an examiner, 221international applications for which a letter of irregularity has been sent but no reply has yet been received, and 347international applications for which a reply to a letter of irregularity has already been received but the application is still awaiting final resolution (see Table XIII).
Table XIII
International Bureau
- International Applications Awaiting Resolution -
Year / Total / Examination Pending / Irregular Awaiting Reply / Irregular Reply Received / %2006 / 36,496 / 0.0%
2007 / 39,965 / 0.0%
2008 / 42,070 / 1 / 18 / 0.1%
2009 / 35,848 / 27 / 221 / 347 / 1.7%
11.The average processing time for a regular international application, that is, an application which presents no irregularity, was 45 days in 2009. On the other hand, if the application was considered irregular, the International Bureau issued a letter of irregularity within approximately 32 days. On average, in 2009 the International Bureau waited 48 days to receive a response to a letter of irregularity, while it took 65 additional days to finalize processing, after the receipt of such letter, for an overall average processing time of almost 113 days for irregular applications. This represents a significant advancement, compared to previous years, while also suggesting an improving trend (see Table XIV).
Table XIV
International Bureau
- Average Processing Time -
Year / Regular Applications Average Processing Time / Irregular Applications Average Time for Sending first Letter / Irregular Applications Average Wait Time for Reply / Irregular Applications Average Processing Time after Reply Received / Irregular Applications Average Total Processing Time2006 / 53.37 / 52.84 / 57.00 / 97.33 / 154.33
2007 / 41.11 / 40.54 / 55.44 / 79.79 / 135.24
2008 / 40.35 / 34.73 / 53.84 / 71.66 / 125.50
2009 / 44.76 / 31.80 / 47.70 / 65.22 / 112.92
Section III
Statistical data concerning the management of international registrations
12.In 2009, the International Bureau recorded 82,582 statements of grant of protection, 266,535 notifications of provisional refusal and 10,797 subsequent designations (see Table XV).
Table XV
International Bureau
- Recordings Following the Recording of an International Registration (I) -
Year / Statements of Grant of Protection / Provisional Refusals / Subsequent Designations2007 / 66,732 / 255,822 / 12,605
2008 / 66,934 / 268,105 / 12,070
2009 / 82,582 / 266,535 / 10,797
13.In 2009, the International Bureau recorded 19,234 renewals of international registrations, 31,566 modifications and 7,940 corrections, while issuing2,443 extracts from the International Register
(see Table XVI)
Table XVI
International Bureau
- Recordings Following the Recording of an International Registration (II) -
Year / Renewals Registered / Modifications Registered / Corrections / Extracts Issued2007 / 17,411 / 35,456 / 2,916 / 2,368
2008 / 19,473 / 28,261 / 9,736 / 2,983
2009 / 19,234 / 31,566 / 7,940 / 2,443
14.Finally, from a logistical standpoint, in 2009 the International Bureau received and processed 324,018 official communications relating to international trademark applications or registrations and 13,967 pieces of other official correspondence. In addition, the International Bureau sent 270,094 notifications to holders of international registrations, while providing responses to approximately 28,000 electronic queries
(see Table XVII).
Table XVII
International Bureau
- Correspondence Managed by the International Bureau -
Year / Communications Received by the IB of WIPO / Notifications Sent to Holders / Other Correspondence Received / E-queries received through INTREG2007 / 326,765 / 224,466 / 18,660 / --
2008 / 329,078 / 239,617 / 17,580 / 31,000
2009 / 324,018 / 270,094 / 13,967 / 28,000
[End of Annex and of document]
[*]See paragraph 101 of document MM/LD/WG/6/7.
*This number is slightly higher than the one reported in the 2009 Annual Report, which considers information available on December 31, 2009. This statistical summary was prepared based on information available on March, 2010. Therefore, it considers international applications filed before a national Office prior to December 31, 2009 and received by the International Bureau within the time limit to preserve said filing date.